Which gun would you get?

Which handgun would you choose?

  • Beretta 92fs

    Votes: 17 13.4%
  • HK USP

    Votes: 35 27.6%
  • Springfeild Mil Spec 1911

    Votes: 66 52.0%
  • The new S&W .40 M&P

    Votes: 9 7.1%

  • Total voters
    127
Status
Not open for further replies.

DerringerUser

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
238
Lets just say that someone will buy you a new handgun for christmas, and you get to choose which one. Which would you choose and why?
 
I went with the 92fs. I'm already covered on 1911s (although if anyone has TOO MANY, I will take in strays!).

Now, I just need to find such a great deal deal on the 92fs that I can look at my husband with BIG, INNOCENT eyes and say, "Honey, if I didn't get it, it would have been like throwing money away." :evil:
 
The USP, 'cause I already got a mil-spec 1911, don't care for the Beretta, and the M&P looks funny to me (yeah I know there are more important things than looks, but their are plenty of good looking handguns that work perfectly, so why get something I don't want to look at).
 
Nice. I went with the HK USP because they look awsome and i dont already have one.

I thought the Mil Spec would win by a landslide, because its generally a more expensive gun (i think).
 
I chose the Springfield Armory Mil-Spec. There's not another design that can compare to it. There's no other handgun that comes close to it's service record either:p
 
I chose the Beretta. I haven't fire one since the USAF, but I firmly believe it is a good gun. I have owned and sold two USPs, and I think I will buy another well before christmas. Wouldn't consider the S&W. And as my dad has a great collection of 1911s, I don't feel the need there.
 
1911A1. The Springfield is a good gun. Don't care for Baretta or S&W's semi-autos. Don't know much about H&K's, but haven't cared for what I have seen of them.
 
already have 1911 and S&W mp40

so i picked 92fs because i used to have the 96 and i miss it.
On the other hand if i didnt have any of them id pick the mp40.
 
1911

I've got a Taurus PT99 which is basically the same as the Beretta, the HK and S&W aren't on my want list at the moment.
 
Mil-Spec 1911, because I hate the Beretta, the M&P is just plain ugly, and I don't like the USP as much as a love the 1911. Now, if there was the option for an XD45, I'd have probably chosen that.
 
I voted for the 1911 , I got the M&P for my last birthday and my old AutoOrdinance 1911 is almost worn out .
 
I picked the 1911

I don't have a full size steel frame 1911. I had to find a pic of the Mil-Spec to make sure it doesn't have front cocking serrations.

Make mine stainless

ZM
 
I voted the M&P. I'd prefer to get it in 9mm for range use, but .40 would be okay. It's one of those guns I think would be awesome, but it's so far down my list that it would be a while before my money got spent on it--so, have someone else spend their money on it :D . And, there's not "Version A" or "Version B" for them to mess up on--with the 1911, parkerized or stainless? Same with 92. USP Compact, fullsize, tactical, elite, with what finish?

M&P=1 size fits all.

Besides, for all the others, I would like to "work up" to them on my own money. With the 1911, I'd slowly customize it out the wazoo; 92=good range gun, USP=mother of all ______ {fill in blank with anything fitting}.

Besides, a polymer framed gun should be on my list, but no glocks for me:barf: .
 
I went with the M&P since it's the only one I don't have. IF I didn't have any of them, probably the 1911 because I'm biased :D

Thanks,
DFW1911
 
beretta 92fs is a good gun, i ve had over 200 rounds not a problem.
i had a 1911 also, need to get a 5" two tone from either springfield, kimber, sig or sw.
 
I own 2 of the four & once had 3 of 4. I currently have the Beretta & the HK...love'em both & recommend the both highly. To me, 1 and 1a
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top