Which of these three powders for 45acp?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Detritus said:
so yeah, got no problem with upper end loads
Oh well, in that case! Bullseye works great (5 grains), but for no real tangible reason other than "the seat of my pants", I am partial to 6.5 grains of Unique with a 230gr.
Not super hot, but they're up there.
 
I like Bullseye for 45 acp, as well as W-231. for warmer loads or for a carbine Accurate #5 or VV n340 do well, and WSF isn't bad either.
 
I'm a Bullseye powder fan.

With an OAL of 1.260, a 230gr RN plated bullet from Xtreme, and 4.2gr BE I generate 730 ft/s. That's comfortably above the IDPA PF floor of 718 ft/s. With this load from a Ransom Rest I can generate a 2.5 in group at 50 yards, which is within this 1911's manufacturer's guarantee.

What I am not suffering or particularly aware of is this dirty factor. I clean the gun every few hundred rounds. There is never, ever a residue malfunction.
 
Detritus said:
Never meant to imply that I wanted to "just" make major

Would very much like to have a goodly cushion of MV over and above the 717fps needed for Major with a 230gr bullet.
The reasons why many USPSA shooters use match loads that "just" make power factor are many but mostly for faster stage times.

USPSA shooters will quickly find out faster stage times trumps slight edge in accuracy of loads. You don't need bullseye match level of accuracy for action pistol matches but you do need loads that will allow you to double tap faster.

When I was developing my 1911 loads for USPSA, I tested Bullseye/Clays/WST/W231/Universal/HS-6/WSF but settled with W231 because it allowed my sights to return back to the target/POA faster with least amount of effort due to recoil impulse for the recoil spring rate I was using. Bullseye/WST did produce slightly more accurate loads but recoil impulse was different than slower burning W231. Other shooters also suggested I try different rate recoil springs to fine tune my load for faster double taps.

when I've asked for suggestions RE powder and loads, a goodly number of the loads suggested were accurate but "powder-puff" loads that I couldn't really use.

so yeah, got no problem with upper end loads
If you found accurate "powder puff" loads, you could try lower rate recoil springs to make your pistol cycle reliably. The goal is to have accurate loads that meet PF requirement while allowing you to return to target/POA fastest/easier.

This article goes into detail how different recoil spring rates affect cycle time for full power vs reduced power match loads - http://www.shootingtimes.com/gunsmithing/recoil-spring-rate-affects-timing/
 
I used Bullseye for years with great results but when I started using a Chargemaster 1500 to weigh charges I found that it would bind itself to the inside of the powder hopper and made it very difficult to empty so I switched to W231/HP-38 and have been very happy.
 
but when I started using a Chargemaster 1500 to weigh charges I found that it would bind itself to the inside of the powder hopper

If you're talking about the powder grains sticking to the inside of the hopper due to static cling. just rub the inside of the hopper with a dryer sheet before loading the powder, works wonders.
I've wound up doing (or did) that for all but the oldest of the powder measures I've ever used. the one that I never used a dryer sheet on was an old herter's branded one with a hopper body so scratched and hazed up it may as well have been frosted glass.
 
"with 230 gr, you are pushing only 717 fps to meet major power factor "
This is a false statement. 717 fps(velocity) will not make 165 PF. It is actually 164.9 And this is still minor PF. And no R/O is going to give you he .1 to make Major.
velocity x mass/1000 = power factor.

We do not round up for anyone.

Now as to powders WST is a popular and pretty good.
 
If you're talking about the powder grains sticking to the inside of the hopper due to static cling. just rub the inside of the hopper with a dryer sheet before loading the powder, works wonders.

Static cling is easy to overcome. The issue with Bullseye is that it's a high nitroglycerin powder which causes it to actually bind itself to certain polymers. It was never a problem with my old Lee powder hopper but the Chargemaster uses a different polymer. I had to use something to lightly scrape it off the sides and when I opened the drain, it wouldn't flow out without using something like a pencil plunged back and forth through the drain end to get it out. It would take 15-20 minutes to fully empty it and then it left the clear hopper permanently clouded and very rough inside.
BTW, RCBS was good enough to send me a replacement clear hopper at no charge.
 
kitsapshooter, many USPSA shooters do not load right to power factor (PF) but 5+ PF over to give them ambient temperature/velocity variation buffer as temperature sensitivity of the powders can vary the fps from winter to summer and I posted 165 and 170 PF/velocities - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=10208455#post10208455
Out of the three for USPSA major PF loads, I would use WST and Bullseye but not Unique as you only need to push 717 fps for 165 PF (730 fps for 170 PF) which is below start charges at less than 14,000 CUP and not sure if Unique will produce consistent enough powder burn for accurate loads.

But if using WST, keep in mind that WST is reverse temperature sensitive so loads you develop now in colder temperature will shoot slower in hot summer weather so would need to rechrono your loads to meet PF requirements.

Bullseye is temperature sensitive but not as bad as W231/HP-38 so you won't have to worry about meeting power factor requirement as your load will shoot faster in the summer heat - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=10117881#post10117881
 
kitsapshooter
velocity x mass/1000 = power factor.
I'm curious, why not go by FT/LBf of energy?
V/1000 squared x 2.22 x mass
717/1000=.717x.717=.5141x2.22=1.141x230gr=262 FT/LBf wow that's pretty weak.
 
Never had a problem. I usually have enough rounds loaded with AA#5 available, and use the bullseye & unique rounds for practice.
 
How many rounds are fired in a match . If less then 200 then wow if your gun malfunctions with any load you're using . Is it really that likely your gun would get so dirty in a match it would stop working ? That's assuming you started with a clean firearm ?

Don't get me wrong I completely understand why you would want the cleanest burning powder for the job but is bullseye really so bad your gun is likely to fail or even might fail ?? I'll admit i'm a rifle guy but have slung quite a few hand gun rounds down range . I'm not sure I ever had a failer do to the firearm being dirty . I've not had many failers period .
 
How many rounds are fired in a match .

will related my personal experience so far

Most of the matches I've shot, the round count is between 150 and 200 (wise shooters to either of the two matches I do every month bring 200 minimum in case of re-shoots). There IS a local match where it's suggested that you show with 250-300, but I have not had a chance to shoot that one yet.

currently my cleaning routine, is boresnake the barrel after each range trip/match, and strip and clean about once a month. so bore every 2-300 and field strip, clean/lube every 5-600rds.
No cleaning related issues/stoppages as of yet. with any of the powders I've used, including some very "high residue" PPU made factory loads.
 
Metal God said:
I'm not sure I ever had a failer [due] to the firearm being dirty. I've not had many failers period.
Some match barrels have tighter chambers and depending on the bullet (especially lubed lead)/powder/charge/taper crimp used (many match shooters use minimal taper crimp for faster sealing of case mouth with chamber), could foul enough to fail to fully chamber a round during a match that required a tap on the back of the slide. More than once, when we inquired if worn/reduced recoil spring was culprit, they were new/relatively new recoil springs and cleaning the chamber addressed the chambering issue. I have even seen some match shooters clean their barrel chambers between stages.

My match 1911/P226/Glocks often went past 500-1000+ round practice sessions without failure to fully chamber (2000+ for Glocks) but 1911 with tighter match barrel was more sensitive to fouling build up with .452" diameter lubed lead bullets. My current Sig 1911 has tight chamber with even shorter leade (almost none) and after 300+ rounds of dirtier reloads using lead lubed bullets and Promo, it will start to slow down and fail to fully chamber if chamber is not cleaned. My 40S&W Lone Wolf barrels have tighter than factory chambers and while it will shoot 1000+ rounds of .400" diameter jacketed/plated bullets without issues, will start to experience failure to fully chamber with .401" diameter lubed lead bullets after 100-200+ rounds.
 
Last edited:
45ACP Powder

I use Bullseye for all my 45 ACPs. 5g of powder behind a 230g plated round nose
for plinking.
 
Update and results..

Well, wound up getting a pound each of Bullseye and Power Pistol (on recommendation of a fellow shooter), loaded up some test batches, and today finally got out to the range to see how they shot.

In think my gun likes 4.4gr of bullseye....
25718190470_9277e7de50.jpg https://flic.kr/p/FbCs25 https://www.flickr.com/photos/31838309@N03/

this was the furthest back of the three targets that I tested the loads on for group. I set it up to simulate the approximate longest engagement(s) typically found at my local match. my point of aim was the bottom of that blue 4-paster patch at the top of the scoring zone.

looks like i'll be spending Friday morning driving around town for the brass and bullets i'm low on and the afternoon loading a batch for this Sunday's match :)


oh and to speak to the slight "dirty powder" side track we had earlier, this is my gun after the 100 round (4x 25rds per load) load testing session, plus 120-something SWC loads that I burned for practice because I can't get them to feed reliably.
this is the sootiest I've had the gun in a long while.
25718214880_e7738cb653.jpg

25897947802_b01650bc3f.jpg
 
Last edited:
If you can find the WST you can shoot over 1000 rounds and it want get that dirty. WST is one of the few powders that burn clean even at low pressure/reduced loads. I had a fellow shooter at the range one day complaining his SS 1911 was black like that after 1 mag. Then I showed him my SS 1911 after 200 rounds, it was cleaner than his.
 
Pressure levels also make a difference in how clean a powder burns. Can't always blame it on the powder.

WST, Competition, Clays, & N310 will all be cleaner than that for light loads shot in quantity.
 
Wow, you bought Bullseye and Power Pistol. Those are two very different powders. Too bad you didn't buy BE-86 instead.

Along with freeloaders listed above W231, AA#5, Zip and a few others would be better choices because they are cleaner yet deliver similar results.

Yes, very dirty usually which in a competition worries me. If you gunk up the works go the point of failure there goes your match and it could have been avoided.
 
I use Unque for full power service loads and jacketed bullets both ball and JHP's. 6.2 to 6.5 grs of Unique for 850 fps + 230gr JHP's or FMJ's, 7.8grs of Unique for 185gr JHP's for 1,050 fps.

For 200gr LSWC target loads I'll use whatever fast power on hand including Red Dot, Green Dot, AA2, Clays, W231 are some I've loaded. Bullseye would work fine.
 
Back to original post, I bought Win 231 at Perry's gun shop in Wendell (Raleigh area) today. They had plenty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top