Which one of these over-the-top handguns would you choose?

Which of these over-the-top handguns would you choose?

  • Magnum Research BFR Revolver in 45/70

    Votes: 29 12.8%
  • Magnum Research BFR Revolver in 460 S&W

    Votes: 9 4.0%
  • Magnum Research BFR Revolver in 500 S&W

    Votes: 3 1.3%
  • Magnum Research BFR Revolver in 500 JRH

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • S&W Model 500 in 500 S&W

    Votes: 38 16.8%
  • S&W Model 460 in 460 S&W

    Votes: 36 15.9%
  • Magnum Research Desert in 44 Remington Magnum

    Votes: 45 19.9%
  • Magnum Research Desert in 50 Action Express

    Votes: 32 14.2%
  • Ruger Super Redhawk in 480 Ruger

    Votes: 34 15.0%

  • Total voters
    226
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Which one of these over-the-top handguns would you choose?


Only handgun up there I would consider "over the top" is the .45/70 and only because it is a rifle cartridge. All the others, within the parameters of their intended use are quite legitimate, effective and affordable. Many will outperform the .45/70 in a handgun platform, while at the same time giving a much more pleasant shooting experience. Thus it would be one of the last choices for me.
 
Only handgun up there I would consider "over the top" is the .45/70 and only because it is a rifle cartridge. All the others, within the parameters of their intended use are quite legitimate, effective and affordable. Many will outperform the .45/70 in a handgun platform, while at the same time giving a much more pleasant shooting experience. Thus it would be one of the last choices for me.

They're ALL over the top. That's axiomatic.
 
Subjective maybe, but not axiomatic. You were asking for opinions, correct?

Yes I'm asking for an opinion -- which of the listed over the top guns would you choose?

The question is which one. Not if they are over the top which they most assuredly are.

"Over-The-Top: going beyond what is expected, usual, normal, or appropriate : excessive or exaggerated."
 
I like my hand, wrist and arm bones right where they are, so I'd pick the DE in .44. For YOU, I'd pick the .45-70 since it's the most over the toppest.
 
I guess the Ruger. What in the name of anti armor capability do you want ANY of these for? Unless you are going into grizzly country.
 
Yes I'm asking for an opinion -- which of the listed over the top guns would you choose?

The question is which one. Not if they are over the top which they most assuredly are.

"Over-The-Top: going beyond what is expected, usual, normal, or appropriate : excessive or exaggerated."
I believe that buck's point is that it's a matter of perspective. You may consider them over the top, but someone who hunts large or dangerous game with a handgun would consider them perfectly normal and reasonable hardware for that purpose. They certainly are impressive, but a reasonable use could be argued for any of them................... with the exception of a 45-70 revolver. Those are just stupid given the velocity loss with a short barrel. I see no practical use for them that a traditional handgun cartridge like the 44, 460, or the 500 variants won't do just as well out of a handgun.

If you reload 45-70, then I guess an argument could be made since you've already invested in the cartridge. If all you want is a noise maker, I guess that works too, but the other guns will give you better performance.
 
Of the guns on your list I currently own a S&W460ES and a Desert Eagle 50ae. My vote went to the 460. Having previously owned a BFR in 475 Linebaugh, I would strongly advise against the BFRs, while well built guns the grip ergonomics is a deal breaker for me.

The 460 got my vote because it is versatile, 45colt, 454casull, and if you get moonclips and the cylinder modified you could conceivably shoot 45acp. In my personal case I had to offset the practicality of it by getting the non ported snub nose version. Wouldn't want the wife think think I have gone sane all of a sudden. Good luck in your search sounds like you have a fun problem to solve.
 
I guess the Ruger. What in the name of anti armor capability do you want ANY of these for? Unless you are going into grizzly country.

These are "cartoon guns." I can't really justify one, other than "I want one, they're neat."
 
Of the guns on your list I currently own a S&W460ES and a Desert Eagle 50ae. My vote went to the 460. Having previously owned a BFR in 475 Linebaugh, I would strongly advise against the BFRs, while well built guns the grip ergonomics is a deal breaker for me.

The 460 got my vote because it is versatile, 45colt, 454casull, and if you get moonclips and the cylinder modified you could conceivably shoot 45acp. In my personal case I had to offset the practicality of it by getting the non ported snub nose version. Wouldn't want the wife think think I have gone sane all of a sudden. Good luck in your search sounds like you have a fun problem to solve.

Very good input, thanks. The Smith 460's versatility really sounds good. The bad ergos on the BFR sound more than a bit painful.
 
I've owned, and sold a DE in 44 Mag and had the 357 Mag conversion for it. While the cool factor is pretty good that gun is a HUGE PITA to clean and it does need to be cleaned. It's a direct gas blow back, like an AR so it gets fouled up good after a couple of range trips. For that reason alone I'd pass on the DEs.

For me it would be the BFR in 45-70. That is over the top and since I reload it wouldn't be too bad keeping ammo for it.
 
Very good input, thanks. The Smith 460's versatility really sounds good. The bad ergos on the BFR sound more than a bit painful.
Hold one before you write them off all together. For me the grip encouraged the muzzle to flip causing the grip to rotate in my hand no matter how good of a grip I had on it. That motion caused the texturing to chew up the skin on my palm after a few rounds. The S&W grips seem to push back towards the web of my hand which I prefer for the hard hitting rounds.
 
bfr45/70

thats the one i'd go with , i already have an original guide gun in that caliber , so a pistol would make it a set and it looks impressive as hell
 
Hold one before you write them off all together. For me the grip encouraged the muzzle to flip causing the grip to rotate in my hand no matter how good of a grip I had on it. That motion caused the texturing to chew up the skin on my palm after a few rounds. The S&W grips seem to push back towards the web of my hand which I prefer for the hard hitting rounds.


That seems to be the difference between a DA grip and a SA grip. Many folks prefer a SA grip because it indeed does allow the gun to "roll back" in their hand under recoil. Just as many prefer the DA grip for the reasons you state. I'm one too, that prefers DA styles.
 
Grip frames on SA revolvers are made to allow the gun to rotate back. The grips should be smooth so as not to tear up your skin. That should not be something that stops you from buying it, all SA revolvers will roll if designed correctly.
 
Grip frames on SA revolvers are made to allow the gun to rotate back. The grips should be smooth so as not to tear up your skin. That should not be something that stops you from buying it, all SA revolvers will roll if designed correctly.
Which is why they should have smooth grips. Then the question becomes how much recoil can you handle before it slaps you in the noggin. I pushed .475 Linebaugh to the upper limits of published loads in mine. If it had smooth grips I doubt I would of been able to keep a good hold of it, and with the textured grips it chewed up my hands. If I were to do it again I would convert a Ruger Bisley.
 
Very interesting discussion. I was also thinking that:

The S&W's double action design isn't any real advantage over the single action BFR as very few would shoot the 500 in double action.

I don't need another PITA gun to clean, so it was interesting to hear the comments on the Desert Eagle.

The S&W 460's ammo versatility is impressive...

The S&W 500 is the only big-boy handgun that I have heard people say they do not like to shoot on Youtube. Hickok45, Demolition Ranch, etc. all seem to share the same opinion of the gun.

People on Youtube seem to actually enjoy shooting the BFR in 45/70 -- usually with the longer barrel.

The Desert Eagle has an unfortunate "punk reputation" due to movies and TV.

I had no clue that single action revolvers (I only have .22's) are designed so the gun will rotate. Fascinating...
 
I went with "S&W Model 460 in 460 S&W." I like Smiths, and this one is capable of firing a nice sensible cartridge, .45 Colt, should I happen to be in a sensible mood.
 
Over the top? I'd say a J-frame Scandium revolver like the 340PD shooting hot .357Mag loads. :p
 
If fun is the only consideration, I can't see how you would choose anything besides the Desert Eagle .50
Its a .50! It's an auto! It's insanely loud! It shoots a fireball! The terminal performance on things like milk jugs and melons is spectacular! And , unlike most of the others, it isn't actually painful to shoot. The Desert eagle platform is so heavy and gas powered that it makes the .50 surprisingly pleasant to shoot (with double hearing protection)
My shooting buddy has one , I was really surprised how shoot able it is. I never turn down the opportunity to blast away with it.
 
I reluctantly chose the Ruger SRH option. I would rather it be chambered for .454/.45, and I would install an original-style, pre-Hogue GP100 grip. This particular grip is just about perfect for my hands, as if designed by a long-lost twin, from whom I was separated at birth.

If .454/.45, I would mostly shoot .45 Colt ammo, because I damaged my right wrist enough, already, in the Eighties, when I thought big-bore Magnum recoil was exhilarating. (Though left-handed, I am "right-armed," and so fired large, heavy handguns mostly right-handed.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top