Eutycus
Member
You know I got reprimanded before on this very forum for not staying on topic. I was under the impression that this thread was about gun owners not voting consistently . I must have misread the OP.
And that's what most of them are, excuses not reasons.Yes, but every possible excuse for not voting gun has been posted.
It is going to be interesting from now to the election what with Kennedy in the mess too.It seems alot of those who do vote don't like any of the 2 main choices. They now have a 3rd choice. Granted he'll never win, but I bet he does draw alot (millions) of votes from Trump or Kamala.
I'm afraid you're right. Alot of votes are going to be siphoned off because of Trump's and Kamala's unpopularity. Wasted is really a better word for it.Just noticed
Trump.
It is my perception that third party candidates have sapped more votes from Republicans than from Democrats.
First of all, RFK Jr., is no friend of gun owners. And, according to the latest polls, he's fading fast -- now polling at 3% while Stein and West are polling at 0% each. What's happening is that the "double haters" are moving toward Harris. Also, RFK Jr. is rapidly running out of money. He may end up endorsing Trump in exchange for a cushy ambassadorship.It is going to be interesting from now to the election what with Kennedy in the mess too.It seems alot of those who do vote don't like any of the 2 main choices. They now have a 3rd choice. Granted he'll never win, but I bet he does draw alot (millions) of votes from Trump or Kamala.
I keep hearing how gun owners, as a whole, are inconsistent voters. I am kinda flabbergasted by that, if true. I guess there are reasons, but I can’t think of good ones.
I'm afraid you're right. Alot of votes are going to be siphoned off because of Trump's and Kamala's unpopularity. Wasted is really a better word for it.
Or how about "I'll show him, I just won't vote". That pouting gives the "other guy" another vote because your vote didn't cancel out one of his.Cutting off one's nose to spite one's face...
Hopefully they at least get exercise, so its not a total waste of time and effort.
I very much support the Article V process. But as of right now, we have THIS game with THESE rules.Don't assume that the situation with the Supreme Court will remain as is. Although it's practically impossible to remove Supreme Court justices, Congress could trim SC jurisdiction with a simple law (for example, by excluding 2nd Amendment cases). And although justices have lifetime appointments, that doesn't necessarily mean that the lifetime service must be on the Supreme Court. A law could be passed putting justices on "emeritus" or "senior" status after, say, 18 years on the SC bench, or rotating them out to the Circuits.
And don't forget the idea, circulating among conservative circles, for convening an "Article 5 Convention." This could end up giving us an entirely new constitution, even though the proponents swear up and down that it wouldn't. It's doubtful that the 2nd Amendment would survive such a process. (Remember, the only historical precedent we have for this is the original constitutional convention, which was called to "revise the Articles of Confederation." It very quickly exceeded that scope.)
I keep hearing how gun owners, as a whole, are inconsistent voters. I am kinda flabbergasted by that, if true. I guess there are reasons, but I can’t think of good ones.
I did run across one person who said he didn’t want to vote for Trump. I told him that the way I see it, my vote is more for the SCOTUS judges that will be appointed in the next 4 years. Not sure if I swayed him or not.
Any observations one way or another?
Not a single one of our choices are..First of all, RFK Jr., is no friend of gun owners.
I am a gun owner who attends church at least weekly. But I vote consistently. Maybe I'm the odd one?
We tend to be fatalists and that saps initiative.I guess there are reasons,
Wait, what? I've been wearing blue jeans for sixty years, and been voting since in turned 18.Think about a study that came to the conclusion the “blue jean wearers” don’t vote consistently. No surprise there either.