My major reason for mentioning a gun is either the quality inherent in it's design, materials and manufacture or it's lack thereof. I get angry when I see someone talking about their neat new pot metal wondergun with the big price tag. I'm not putting
them down, I want others who are reading the thread to know before they get all goo goo eyed about it down at the local ripoff artist's gun store that they are buying
junk! On the other hand, if a gun has extraordinary quality for the price I heap praises on the manufacturer.
There are things to learn here, if I tell you a gun is made of zamak go find out for yourself, if
you think zamak is a proper gun material then knock yourself out. My job is done when I express my opinions about certain guns, in the end it's "Caveat Emptor".
For instance, if I mention a gun that I know from personal experience is well made and functions well out of the box that is no guarantee that the one you buy will be. Did I lie? Hardly, you might be the unfortunate buyer of a bad example.
But if I tell people about a zinc gun and someone else says "I have 9 billion rounds through mine without a failure" then all I can say is that something stinks in Copenhagen, someone is in the business of making and selling junk guns!
So everyone who bought a junk gun without knowing it was made of inferior materials thinks I'm picking on them when I say it here.
They
should say "I wish someone had mentioned that earlier".