Lone_Gunman
Member
Skunkape,
So you consider Saddam a more reliable source of information than the US?
So you consider Saddam a more reliable source of information than the US?
- Lone_GunmanSo you consider Saddam a more reliable source of information than the US?
- Lone_GunmanIf you think the WMD did not exist simply because we have not found them, then you must logically also believe that Saddam and Osama never existed either, as they have never been found.
The West (mainly the United States) made the deliberate attacking of civilians in order to break morale an acceptable military strategy.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwtwo/area_bombing_02.shtmlWhen on the night of 24 August 1940 the Luftwaffe - accidentally and against Hitler's orders - dropped some bombs over London, the Prime Minister requested a retaliatory raid on Berlin. Hitler responded with the Blitz and the following months saw tit-for-tat raids on each other's cities.
I mean, it's hard to keep spouting about "civilian casualties" when you're arguing FOR total war.
Ape repliedDo you think the WTC was a viable military target?
If Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were, then yes, New York most certainly was.
You give me four years and some sympathetic neighbors, and I figure I can hide stuff pretty good. I'm in no hurry on finding WMD evidence
But not being able to account for them will just give steam to the campaigns of Kerry