Would you feel safe with an m1 garand in grizzly country?

Status
Not open for further replies.
LMAO Yes Kodiak I know it's doable just saying difficult and really a pain in the arse. Not to mention, which would you find easier to bring to aim, that cross shoulder slung shottie or a chest slung big bore hand cannon? My vote, being as I have tried both, is for my hand cannon
 
Wow, that guy fly fishing seems to have a magazine extension on his shotgun. He must be an idiot who doesn't know what he's doing............
 
Yeah, save the Garand in the closet for its historical value. Bring along a cheaper firearm, a shotgun with slugs is the right tool to have.
 
On the nature shows on National Geographic, when those guys go tagging grizzly bears, they carry a 12ga. pump loaded with slugs. A cheap mossberg 500 would suffice and it has two extractors instead of one. It is a good thing to have anyway, meaning if you don't have a shotgun and can swing one, it would be a good idea. Reliability is the big thing here. If you have to shoot one in self defense, it will be close range, and the slug fired from a pump is the best thing.

But if you are only going fishing, and are trying to keep away from them (although they like to go fishing too...) and have bear spray too, I can't see how your Garand wouldn't suffice. I wouldn't think you need to go get a new armory just to go fishing for five days if you are careful to stay away from them. As far as the load, I'd use the most reliable loads, plural, you have vs. the most powerful one you can load. A few .30cal rounds to the noggin will stop just about anything outside Africa and Asia. Just don't miss whatever you use, and don't underestimate the effectiveness of bear spray. Get the fire extinguisher can that sprays a long way for sure.
 
Not to mention, which would you find easier to bring to aim, that cross shoulder slung shottie or a chest slung big bore hand cannon?

A shotgun. It would be pure chance if you brained a bear coming at you at 40 mph with a handgun. I actually carry a double in a pack so that the stock hangs over my shoulder allowing me to draw it quickly. In earlier threads Cosmoline has described a type of scabbard that allows you to do something similar with a long arm.

The only time I ever carry a handgun is if I'm beach fishing and that's a Ruger Bisley in .45 Colt. I figure I'll have room and time to line up a shot if a bear gets testy. Along a river in the brush, I wouldn't consider a handgun, not that it matters because you probably won't have time to get a shot off no matter you're carrying. They don't warn you, they just rush you from cover.
 
Listen to Cosmoline. And carry a 12 pump full of slugs. It's the most powerful common firearm available.
 
looks like its gonna be my 22" 1100 that holds 6 rounds with slugs.

im very familiar with it because i bought it brand new in the mid 80's (for 268 dollars).. its really not too heavy and i already have some nice equipment for it, sling, travel case, etc,,,,.

i do think i will buy a decent 44 mag revolver because i havent owned one in at least 25 years and i suppose its time again, and i just want one. i didnt reload metallic cartridges back when i owned my last one which was a super redhawk, but i do now so i can just buy a shell plate, a die plate, a set of carbide dies, and another autodisc measure with the powder through expander setup.
 
DM could you please inform me as to why you would have someone RUN 25 yards then turn and fire please?

To get your heart rate up for the -------------> test...

To add to this thread:

After years and years of hunting big bears, i've figured a few things out!

One is, you would NEVER see me carrying a 45acp for bear protection.... i don't care how you load it!

Shooting into the ground does NOT always make big bears run!

In Alaska, sometimes fireing a gun brings a bear into to you, and many times they come in on the run!

I also learned some things from this thread: If posters try some of the things in this thread, it's gonna clean up the gene pool a bunch! I just hope those that thought them up, are the ones that try them!

DM
 
A .44 mag with Buffalo Bore ammo (the 340 gr. +P+ kind that travels right at 1500fps out of the barrel) "might" be enough for a brown bear but even that load only delivers about 1650 ft./lb.s of power. Compare that to a Breneke 12 ga. Black Magic slug (600 gr. which travels at 1500 fps also but has an energy rating of over 3000 ft./lb.s) and you start to see why the Breneke slug is a far better choice than even the heaviest and most powerful .44 mag. round. And it isn't all about the energy. Contrary to popular belief, the best way to kill a charging bear is to penetrate his brain with a heavy round. Pointed bullets are well known to ricochet off the thick skull of a bear. The Breneke slugs penetrate because they have more directional momentum and a sharp cutting edge on the side of the slug. And just for the record probably the only .44 mag. capable of even firing the huge Buffalo Bore loads would be a Ruger revolver. S&W will certainly not withstand that much pressure. You might get a Taurus to do it but it might fail on you right when you need it. I feel safe enough with my .44 mag around the house and the black bears here but every thing I learned about dealing with bear when I first started having bear problems was that a spitzer bullet will often bounce off a thick bear skull while a big honking slug will go right through that 2" skull.
There is so much misinformation and misconception here I don't even know where to begin. Funny how the slug with its pitiful SD is "plenty" and considered to be the hammer of Thor but the .44Mag with its high SD, much greater propensity to penetrate and break heavy bones, similar velocity and undoubtedly "large enough" diameter is figured as "maybe enough".

You'll notice in Linebaugh's penetration tests, high sectional densities and velocities in the 1200-1300fps range fair VERY well against even classic stopping rifle cartridges.
http://www.handloads.com/misc/Linebaugh.Penetration.Tests.asp?Order=5

Oh and 330-355gr LBT's can be pushed to 1200-1300fps at standard pressures and lengths short enough for S&W cylinders. :rolleyes:

I'm not even gonna touch the silliness about making a head shot on a charging bear.
 
If I'm ever in bear country, and about to be attacked by a big bear, I'm going to call (on my sat phone:rolleyes:)the local game officers to come and protect me, because they are REAL good at Monday morning quarterbacking after someone is mauled. I figure they'll know how to handle it...............................
 
Muzzle energy. Come on. Say it with me. Muzzle energy.
Muzzle energy? Are you serious??? Muzzle energy is WAAAAAY too dependent upon velocity. Which is the most rapidly diminishing factor. Energy is such a vastly outdated measure of a cartridge's effectiveness, I completely disregard it and the world would be a better place if everyone else did as well. Energy does not kill. A wound channel through tissues and subsequent blood loss is what kills. For that you need penetration. Breaking heavy supporting bones is what stops. For that you need a tough bullet that penetrates. For penetration you need mass and tough construction. Mass by itself is not enough, you need a high weight to diameter ratio = sectional density. It has been well proven that at this level, velocities above 1200-1300fps do nothing but flatten trajectory and increase recoil.

The secondary factor in determining muzzle energy is weight. Not SD, not diameter, just weight. Which is bad enough on its own but velocity is doubled in the equation. When we're talking about big bores and heavy bullets, do we really want to use a tool that puts twice as much importance on velocity as it does weight, without taking diameter into consideration whatosever??? Of course not. That would be silly. :rolleyes:


...you'd probably try to shoot a bear in the rear while it was charging you.
I want enough penetration that it exits the rear, hopefully breaking the pelvis on its way out.


You'll be shooting a charging bear that will only give you ONE target, it's head. Talk about misinformation. How else will you shoot a charging bear. Come on. We all want to know.
Again, seriously??? You stop a charging bear the same way hunters have stopped dangerous game for the last 150yrs, you break the onside shoulder. Said critter will at least change direction, if not hit the dirt. Then you shoot him again. Then you anchor him with a brainshot. While he's on the ground. Not moving at 40 friggin' miles per hour. Do you have a single clue what you are talking about??? Your understanding of this stuff is even more dismal than your other favorite topics.


If you think a S&W will handle a big round like that without shaking apart you might try to inform the people on the S&W forum because they all say don't do it. But we all know you know everything.
The biggest issue with S&W's is frame stretching. Frame stretching is caused by backthrust. Backthrust is a product of pressure. Not bullet weight. The sixgun cares not what weight bullet is being fired from it, as long as pressures are sane.


Besides, I thought you put me on your ignore list, for the fourth time??? :barf:
 
To get your heart rate up for the -------------> test...

Ok had me wondering there DM. I see that point well. Although if you want a TRUE test that would be closer to the reality of the feeling of getting charged (been there so I do know) you better make the run closer to 200 yard sprint :) and you better have a spare set of clean shorts as well. Bill Cosby said it best "First you say it then you do it,,OHHHHHHHH SH**"

One is, you would NEVER see me carrying a 45acp for bear protection.... i don't care how you load it!

Agreed. but if it is all you have, I guess it would be better than throwing rocks :)

Shooting into the ground does NOT always make big bears run!

In Alaska, sometimes fireing a gun brings a bear into to you, and many times they come in on the run!

Little known fact there and you sir are dead on correct. Bears have started to learn that gun shots equal something good to eat just hit the ground and "I aint gotta chase the damn thing"

CraigC, could you please explain to us where you would attempt to aim at a charging Bruin? Now, again, we are talking about DEFENSIVE shooting at a distance that will keep your butt outta jail here. Anything outside of 20 yards and the authorities are going to be looking at you all wobble eyed. Now, a full out pissed off charging Brownie can cover 20 yards in about a second and a half give or take a bit. If you hit it ANYWHERE but CNS you can go ahead and have your name changed to "DINNER". My choice of defensive firearm may or may not be the best choice for everyone because I grew up shooting large bore handguns and am very proficient in the use of one in dire situations. Others, like others have said, would be better suited to the better aiming inherent to a longer barrel such as the shotgun. The 12ga slug has saved many lives in AK by dropping the big beasties in their tracks. All your ballistic paper data seems to be a little wonky there because according to you, a slug wont stop a charging bear yet it seems that it not only HAS done it, but done it MANY MANY times.
 
You were posting while I was editing, re: shot placement.

I never said a slug wouldn't do the job. I have no idea how well a slug actually does on flesh. Though I have read some accounts of them failing. What I contend is how effective they are compared to other cartridges. I firmly believe they are not as magical as folks believe, because there is NEVER any supporting data posted. Never. Ever. Just people repeating what they've heard and that ain't good enough for me. This ain't rocket science and we have 150yrs of experience in Africa to pull from. Applying logic and what we KNOW about penetration, big bores and dangerous critters, it simply does not add up.
 
Again, seriously??? You stop a charging bear the same way hunters have stopped dangerous game for the last 150yrs, you break the onside shoulder. Said critter will at least change direction, if not hit the dirt. Then you shoot him again. Then you anchor him with a brainshot. While he's on the ground. Not moving at 40 friggin' miles per hour. Do you have a single clue what you are talking about??? Your understanding of this stuff is even more dismal than your other favorite topics.

Well CraigC I can see from that post right there that you have never been charged by anything bigger than a Raccoon. First off, you don't change the direction of a Brownie with anything short of a Howitzer. I've been charged more than once and had to dispatch 2 in my 40+ years of being in the field. The first one was a female with cubs and we crossed paths pretty close. I was only 22 then and had not really learned the WALK FRIGGIN LOUD and make noise so I had shocked her. I had a .44mag on my hip and I got lucky. First shot hit dead center on the point of her shoulder. Guess what it did NOT do as you suggest it would? Turn her. She didn't even flinch. I got the second round just above her nose and it traveled up the sinus cavity to the brain. She stopped literally inches from my feet. The second one was a big male fishing and territorial as hell. Bluffed a couple of times then came on an all out thrash. 1 shot to the muzzle and died a foot from me. All your little energy books and calculations can NOT take the place of real world experience and proof. I know SEVERAL guides in AK that have had to defend themselves using the 12ga slug and they would never even think of using anything else. Although a few of them do like my .500 S&W and they may start carrying them as a backup sidearm.
 
A grizzlies brain is oblong and from the front is roughly the size of a softball. And it's coming at 40 mph, and bobbing up and down as it comes.

Ballistics don't mean squat. Hitting that small target means everything. And bullets will not bounce off a bears skull unless you shoot it at eye level or above, but since there's no brain behind that part of the skull you just missed your shot, so it doesn't really matter. The brain is behind the nose and mouth.
 
First off, you don't change the direction of a Brownie with anything short of a Howitzer. I've been charged more than once and had to dispatch 2 in my 40+ years of being in the field. The first one was a female with cubs and we crossed paths pretty close. I was only 22 then and had not really learned the WALK FRIGGIN LOUD and make noise so I had shocked her. I had a .44mag on my hip and I got lucky. First shot hit dead center on the point of her shoulder. Guess what it did NOT do as you suggest it would?
Thanks for making my point for me. Guessing at what year it was, you were probably using a standard fare 240gr JHP or JSP. No, I wouldn't expect that to change the bear's direction either. Were any bones broken? Or did you do like the USFS and deduce that since the old standby 240gr load failed that it was the fault of the cartridge, rather than simply poor bullet choice???


All your little energy books and calculations can NOT take the place of real world experience and proof.
Of course not but see, this is what we call doing your HOMEWORK!!! :rolleyes:
 
I firmly believe they are not as magical as folks believe, because there is NEVER any supporting data posted.

In this and other threads involving the topic I have posted ballistic gel data for hardcast slugs. There is also the real-world supporting data of the many bears dropped with slugs up here.

There is evidence to suggest that buckshot is insufficient, both ballistic and real world. Soft foster slugs are also not great. But hardcast slugs are SOP for DLP shootings. The economic issues, which you dismiss, are a valid issue. The country is rough on all equipment, and rifles are more expensive and more valuable than simple slug guns. They're also much cheaper than the ultra-magnum X-frames or Casulls. Further, sole reliance on an uber-magnum revolver instead of a long gun is ill advised. However far you think a .500 S&W will out-penetrate a Brenneke, you still have to get the rounds into the beast.
 
I never said a slug wouldn't do the job. I have no idea how well a slug actually does on flesh.

You've never actually seen them in flesh and your bashing them??? :what: A few of the hunters here that use slugs here over on PA black bear have showed me pictures of what a slug does to them. They enter ~.70" wide and exit an inch and a half wide while removing every bone, muscle, and organ that got in the way. One guy even showed me a picture where you could look straight through the hole it where he shot it in the shoulder. There was literally nothing there. It was a perfect hole completely through. (He used the Brenneke slugs I talked about earlier)

Though I have read some accounts of them failing.

No bullet is completely perfect. I'm sure any one of us could go on Google and find bullets in any caliber that have "failed."

A 12 gauge slug will beat a .44 Mag any day of the week. The slug is 3x as heavy, moving a little faster, and putting over 3x the energy on target.
 
In this and other threads involving the topic I have posted ballistic gel data for hardcast slugs.
Repost it then. I've done this several times here and have never seen it.


A few of the hunters here that use slugs here over on PA black bear have showed me pictures of what a slug does to them.
And that is the sort of anecdotal evidence this silly myth is based on. Tunnels in 200lb black bears.


A 12 gauge slug will beat a .44 Mag any day of the week.
Prove it.


The slug is 3x as heavy, moving a little faster, and putting over 3x the energy on target.
Yet penetrates half as deeply.
 
Would if I could. You'll never see it on here because he's 73+ years old and has no interest in technology so the picture was in film taken almost 6 years ago. If I can get him to dig it out and give it to me, I'll put it up in a heartbeat.
 
Thanks for making my point for me. Guessing at what year it was, you were probably using a standard fare 240gr JHP or JSP. No, I wouldn't expect that to change the bear's direction either. Were any bones broken? Or did you do like the USFS and deduce that since the old standby 240gr load failed that it was the fault of the cartridge, rather than simply poor bullet choice???

Not even close bud. They were 260gr hard casts loaded hot as hell. It shattered her shoulder and as I said, she didn't even flinch. A determined Brownie doesn't stop and ask for directions buddy. He/She makes up her mind to get to you and you can bet, short of a CNS it damn sure will. There is only one animal on earth that's more unstoppable, in my opinion, and that would be The Cape Buff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top