iMagUdspEllr
Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2010
- Messages
- 88
@Nom de Forum:
Wow. You are the one who is insulted? Okay. Forget it. Then I apologize.
Just because everyone is doing it doesn't mean that is what is what they concluded. I think I will go with what GLOOB said. They took the easy way out. They copied a cheap and easy design that worked. It is easier to copy than it is to innovate.
No, I don't need you to recreate it. At this point I would accept you telling me that the trigger safety saved you from a drawstring ND (if that honestly happened to you). I'm not baiting you to do anything except be reasonable and honest with me. Level with me. If the trigger safety never saved you and you are having this hard of a time coming up with a common and legitimate example that proves me wrong (not some obscure highly unlikely event), then it looks like the trigger safety isn't so useful just like I have been saying this whole time.
I think it is pretty reasonable for me to say that most things (and the most common things) that get in the trigger guard are going to press the trigger safety and the trigger, not just the trigger. I think you are being unreasonable by claiming the trigger safety significantly (not slightly, not marginally) decreases the chances of an ND when you are having this hard of a time presenting an honest and legitimate counter-example. I'm not trying to tell you to lie. I'm trying to get you to admit that you are grossly exaggerating the usefulness of a trigger safety.
If you don't want to do that, cool. If you think that the trigger safety having the ability to save you from a jacket drawstring counts as "significantly decreasing the chances of having an ND", cool. We will agree to disagree, then. We are done here if that is the case. This has nothing to do with trolling. It is called honesty.
Wow. You are the one who is insulted? Okay. Forget it. Then I apologize.
Just because everyone is doing it doesn't mean that is what is what they concluded. I think I will go with what GLOOB said. They took the easy way out. They copied a cheap and easy design that worked. It is easier to copy than it is to innovate.
No, I don't need you to recreate it. At this point I would accept you telling me that the trigger safety saved you from a drawstring ND (if that honestly happened to you). I'm not baiting you to do anything except be reasonable and honest with me. Level with me. If the trigger safety never saved you and you are having this hard of a time coming up with a common and legitimate example that proves me wrong (not some obscure highly unlikely event), then it looks like the trigger safety isn't so useful just like I have been saying this whole time.
I think it is pretty reasonable for me to say that most things (and the most common things) that get in the trigger guard are going to press the trigger safety and the trigger, not just the trigger. I think you are being unreasonable by claiming the trigger safety significantly (not slightly, not marginally) decreases the chances of an ND when you are having this hard of a time presenting an honest and legitimate counter-example. I'm not trying to tell you to lie. I'm trying to get you to admit that you are grossly exaggerating the usefulness of a trigger safety.
If you don't want to do that, cool. If you think that the trigger safety having the ability to save you from a jacket drawstring counts as "significantly decreasing the chances of having an ND", cool. We will agree to disagree, then. We are done here if that is the case. This has nothing to do with trolling. It is called honesty.