Triggers on Ruger SR9c and S&W M&P9 Shield: Advice Needed

Status
Not open for further replies.

AntiSpin

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Messages
87
In the circles in which I move I am known as the guy who will take non-shooters to the range, several times if they want to go, and introduce them to gun safety, several different types of firearms, and the art of hitting what one aims at.

My most recent such foray involved a couple who were considering the acquisition of a firearm for home defense, and wanted to know about the desirability of the different kinds. (They were initially enthralled with the idea of a 12 ga. pump, because “the noise will scare them away and we won't have to hurt them.” I explained why it was not a good idea to depend upon that hope.)

I took them to the range and let them shoot four different semi-auto pistols, two revolvers, and two different types of rifle, and talked about and demonstrated the design and operational differences, and the advantages and disadvantages, of the two types of handguns.

Prior to our second trip to the range they notified me that they had “jumped the gun” a bit, so to speak, decided that a 9mm semi-auto would be best for their needs and abilities, and went out and purchased one apiece, a Ruger SR9c and an S&W M&P9 Shield.

We went back to the range and they each put 100 rounds through their respective purchases, and did reasonably well considering their lack of experience and the conditions of the pistols.

And the latter is the problem I’m dealing with. The triggers on both those guns are terrible. The S&W feels like a two-stage trigger, and once the slack is taken up it feels like it’s being pulled through gravel. The Ruger has a long, tough pull that feels like winching an upside-down Edsel across a half-mile of wrecking yard.

I have no prior experience with either of those pistols; my questions are: (1) is this normal for those two guns, and (2)if so, will those triggers “wear in” enough through use to be considered useable in the real world if they’re ever actually needed, or (3) will those triggers need to be replaced before those guns become useable?

I have read about something called the “Apex” trigger. Might that be the best solution for either one or both of those pistols?

Any advice will be appreciated.
 
Normally folks like the SR9c's trigger.

I "fixed" my shields trigger with about 2 minutes on the work sharp with the 6000 grit belt.

If they did reasonable well, and don't know better why not let them be... Did they know to complain about the striker junk? If they've never felt an X5 trigger they probably don't know the Shield or SR's triggers are bad.
 
My SR9c's trigger is quite nice IMO. Mine is smooth, very little creep and has a really nice, short, crisp reset.

Sorry that your friend's isn't good. I wonder if Ruger would do anything about it if contacted, I know they changed some triggers in the SR series. Else I think gallowayprecision.com has a trigger smoothing kit, but I have no experience with it.

I agree on the M&P though, only thing I can't handle on that platform.
 
I put the Apex striker block in my Shield and it worked very well. I also did some smoothing on the trigger bar with the Dremel. Put 200 rounds through it and things will be much better.
As to the Ruger SR9 - I sold mine. Hated the trigger.

Wonder why they didn't get a Glock? Everybody has at least one.:D
 
Our later production SR9c has a noticeably smoother and slightly lighter trigger than my early production SR9, which has a heavy but usable trigger. I do know they changed the trigger slightly when they introduced the SR9c, but they are both still heavier than our glock 19 gen4 which has a mush/squeeze trigger feel.

Can't help you with the s and w.

I recommend against an aftermarket trigger in a self defense pistol, especially one that could potentially lighten the trigger pull. Potential liability in courts, and reliability in the gun.
 
I have read about something called the “Apex” trigger. Might that be the best solution for either one or both of those pistols?
What you were likely reading about was the Duty/Carry Action Enhancement Kit (D/C AEK) from Apex Tactical Specialties. For the S&W Shield that have the Shield Carry Kit Kit (SCK) which provides a clean 5.5lb trigger press https://apextactical.com/store/product-info.php?pid65.html

I have their trigger kit on my M&P9 fullsize and have several friends who have the AEK on their M&P also. It is a huge improvement and is extremely reliable
 
What is your personal reference trigger? If you are used to shooting a high end 1911 the Ruger and M&P triggers are terrible. I am very familiar with M&P triggers, they suck at first, but over 500-1,000 rounds greatly improve loosing much of the grittiness. Can't comment on the Ruger, but suspect the same thing happens. My advise, leave the guns alone, let the new owners learn the idiosyncrasies of their new pistols.
 
Your description of the SR9 trigger is nothing like mine, which is as good or better than most Glocks or XDs I've shot. Hickock45 gave the trigger extremely high praise.

Haven't shot the Shield, so I can't say anything there.
 
In the circles in which I move I am known as the guy who will take non-shooters to the range, several times if they want to go, and introduce them to gun safety, several different types of firearms, and the art of hitting what one aims at.

First, way to go on this! I ever run into you in the real world, remind me that I owe you a beer (If you don't drink or we're at the range, we can substitute beer for some other tasty beverage.)

Taking new people to the range is, IMHO the best way to get new people involved in shooting.

Second, in regards to the trigger: I've got both an SR9 full size and a Shield. I love them both VERY much. for both guns, when you tried the trigger, or were you dry firing?

I ask because from the factory, the SR9 family has a magazine disconnect safety, and will let you dry fire the gun without a magazine, but the trigger pull is less than desirable. If you add a magazine, or remove the mag disconnect safety, it will make a substantial difference on your trigger pull. Also, I've found that it smooths up considerably with a little range time.

For the Shield (aka my favorite carry gun) I JUST NOW tried dry firing it, and I felt like the trigger was pretty good. Maybe not as crisp as it could have been, but it wasn't super heavy. I've shot Shields with a little bit of a polished trigger group, and they were slicker than engine oil.

I too am curious, what kinds of guns do you normally shoot? If you're used to a 1911 with a match trigger, then I can definitely see why you would not think too highly of the Ruger and S&W triggers. But if you're used to shooting a stock J-frame, the trigger should be no issue, and I'd start asking myself if there is something actually wrong with the gun...

Also curious, any reason why you had them shoot a couple rifles, but no shotgun? Were you just afraid that if they liked the shotgun, that would lead to them getting one and relying on the sound deterrent? Also, what rifles did you have them shoot? Again, I'm just curious.



Wonder why they didn't get a Glock? Everybody has at least one.
True that! Even I have one... I like my Rugers better though :devil:
 
Trigger job for range games, fine. But IMHO for a new shooter and self-defense I think its nothing but ND waiting to happen -- witness the "need" for the NY trigger in a Glock for the NYPD.

When fight or flight kicks in and fine motor control is a memory, there is little difference in a 4lb or 10lb trigger except you've got a much greater chance of firing prematurely with the "better" trigger.


Let them shoot their gun as they bought it and "if it ain't broke don't fix it!" would seem to apply nicely.

Yes every trigger out there is pretty bad compared to the 1911, but my stock Shield is just fine as it came and gets better with some practice -- which is much more important than "improving" the trigger.
 
^ Good news is the SR and Shield both have manual safety's...

I'd recommend they remove the striker block, clip out the trigger safety, and remove the mag disconnect in the Ruger. Then call up Galloways and Apex and order some trigger kits.

;)
 
Personally I would just learn the triggers as they are. It is always interesting to me to get the feel of a different guns trigger. I have not shot either of these but I would be willing to bet money their triggers are miles better than my old Kel Tec P11.
 
Hey – thanks, everyone for the comments. I now have a lot more considerations to think over than I did before I posted.

Let me answer some of the questions: with regard to whether we were dry firing or live firing, it was all live.

I had done some research and had found out about the magazine disconnect in the Ruger ( I really dislike magazine disconnects) and had advised the owner about the possibility and desirability of removing it. He was reluctant to do that, and I felt that his choice should be respected.

And you’re right – though I shoot several different types of rifles and pistols, I mostly shoot the 1911 (though it is a plain jane Springfield, certainly not a match trigger.)

The reason we did not fire a shotgun is this – shotguns have been banned at our range for quite some time (for understandable reasons that are too complex to go into here) but that is just now being changed, and I have not yet gotten a definitive answer on where, when and how they can be used. (We have four different ranges, plus an archery range.) As soon as I get an answer I’ll have them try that as well.

As I always do with new shooters, I took them first to the indoor (rimfire) range, starting them with a scoped, single-shot .22 rifle from a bench (I always want new shooters to start out by actually hitting something, and I bought the single-shot rifle specifically for use by new shooters, for safety’s sake and because I think they’ll have the best chance to hit what they’re aiming at with a .scoped .22 rifle and a rest), then an S&W 22A pistol. We then went to the “short” (pistol) range and fired several autos (.380, 9MM, .45 ACP) and revolvers (.38 and .357), and finally to the rifle range where I offered them both an SKS and a 30-06 hunting rifle. They both shot the SKS (and liked it a lot), but did not fire the 30-06, partly because I am left-handed and so is my rifle.

When we went back for the second session, they fired their new 9MMs, only.

Hope that answers all the questions, and again – thanks very much for all the informative, interesting and provocative responses. I’ll try to remember to put up another post if/when a decision is made about whether or what to do about those triggers, and/or about any changes that result from wearing in, if any.
 
Last edited:
Big fan of the shield

I did a DIY trigger job on it, really all it does is polish the striker safety plunger and trigger bar. Takes out the grit and the trigger feels nice and crisp. Takes about 20 minutes with some 600 grit sandpaper and cordless drill.

Probably does the same thing as dry firing it 1,000 times, just a whole lot quicker.

There is no way it can cause a ND, nor does it change the trigger pull position or weight, just smoothes out the grit.

There are a few videos out there on it.

Is the trigger on the Shield perfect, of course not, but it's not a $1,800 Kimber, it's a $365 carry gun.
 
Personally, for their intentions, let them live with the guns they have without changing anything. They will get better and they will learn how to use their guns effectively. Nothing worse than planting the thoughts of "I have an inferior trigger in my gun, therefore I won't be able to shoot straight". At HD distances, the grouping doesn't need to be a ragged hole.

Anyways for SD purposes, 3-4 reasonably spread out holes are better than 1 hole shot through 4 times. :) It's far more important that the shooter is comfortable with his/her gun in a stressful situation.
 
Was it them complaining of the horrid triggers or you planting the "seed"?
Seems odd that someone "wet behind the ears" with no prior experience can differentiate good from bad.
 
Have to go along with just about everyone else in this thread, and say "Leave the triggers alone". For their use and experience level, the factory triggers are much safer and present no handicap for their intended use.
One of the biggest dangers in introducing newbies to shooting is that we tend to share our own preferences and prejudices.
str1
 
Have to go along with just about everyone else in this thread, and say "Leave the triggers alone". For their use and experience level, the factory triggers are much safer and present no handicap for their intended use.
One of the biggest dangers in introducing newbies to shooting is that we tend to share our own preferences and prejudices.
str1

Agreed, but either the OP is greatly exaggerating about the SR9c trigger or that gun is bad and needs to go back to Ruger. Latter SR9's have delightful triggers.
 
Instead of the shield they should have picked up a CORE....nice striker fired trigger.
 
I had done some research and had found out about the magazine disconnect in the Ruger ( I really dislike magazine disconnects) and had advised the owner about the possibility and desirability of removing it. He was reluctant to do that, and I felt that his choice should be respected.

As a "Instructor" you should realize that advising a new shooter (actually any shooter) to remove a manufacturers safety device (In this case the magazine disconnect) is a very bad and poor judgement.

Your use of colorful prose using "once the slack is taken up it feels like it’s being pulled through gravel. The Ruger has a long, tough pull that feels like winching an upside-down Edsel across a half-mile of wrecking yard" does little to explain the actual condition of the trigger pulls. In addition it seems unlikely that guns from two different manufactures would have as horrible of trigger pulls as you describe.

I have no prior experience with either of those pistols;

This says it all. You don't know how these guns operate and are recommending disabling a safety device without any knowledge of how it will affect how the rest of the gun operates and how it will affect the trigger pull (for better or worse).

As others have commented I find the trigger pull on the Ruger SR9C comfortable to use. In fact I shot one for three months weak handed while my strongside shoulder healed from rotator cuff surgery.

My recommendation is to have your new friends get training from a instructor that is familiar with this types of firearms.
 
"Was it them complaining of the horrid triggers or you planting the "seed"?
Seems odd that someone "wet behind the ears" with no prior experience can differentiate good from bad.

They each commented briefly about the triggers. I tried them and found them (at least to me) as I described. I did not comment to them about my appraisal of the trigger pulls, but did say that they needed to fire them quite a bit, after which they might very well smooth out.

"You don't know how these guns operate and are recommending disabling a safety device without any knowledge of how it will affect how the rest of the gun operates and how it will affect the trigger pull (for better or worse).

I agree generally with your advice, but I had done a lot of online research, familiarizing myself with the way the two guns operated. I read a lot of reviews and noticed that a lot of persons who had purchased them had removed the mag. disconnect and found that it improved the trigger pull. I then spent a lot of time specifically tracking down reports from persons who had removed the mag. disconnect and who reported on how that affected the trigger pull and general operation. I would never even have mentioned it to them without first informing myself through reports from those who have already done it.
 
I did the "finial" sight in of my S&W Shield 40 with Trijicon RMR optic using my carry ammo (Win SxT) and was getting 2" groups at 25 yards off sandbags.

There is nothing wrong with the Shield triggers (I have one in 9 and 40, practice with the 9, carry the 40) that some actual practice won't cure. The trigger on the 9 is "better" simply because its been shot about four times as much, but the trigger on the 40 is just fine for a SD pistol as it is. Both have been 100% out of the box with a variety of ammo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top