In the circles in which I move I am known as the guy who will take non-shooters to the range, several times if they want to go, and introduce them to gun safety, several different types of firearms, and the art of hitting what one aims at.
My most recent such foray involved a couple who were considering the acquisition of a firearm for home defense, and wanted to know about the desirability of the different kinds. (They were initially enthralled with the idea of a 12 ga. pump, because “the noise will scare them away and we won't have to hurt them.” I explained why it was not a good idea to depend upon that hope.)
I took them to the range and let them shoot four different semi-auto pistols, two revolvers, and two different types of rifle, and talked about and demonstrated the design and operational differences, and the advantages and disadvantages, of the two types of handguns.
Prior to our second trip to the range they notified me that they had “jumped the gun” a bit, so to speak, decided that a 9mm semi-auto would be best for their needs and abilities, and went out and purchased one apiece, a Ruger SR9c and an S&W M&P9 Shield.
We went back to the range and they each put 100 rounds through their respective purchases, and did reasonably well considering their lack of experience and the conditions of the pistols.
And the latter is the problem I’m dealing with. The triggers on both those guns are terrible. The S&W feels like a two-stage trigger, and once the slack is taken up it feels like it’s being pulled through gravel. The Ruger has a long, tough pull that feels like winching an upside-down Edsel across a half-mile of wrecking yard.
I have no prior experience with either of those pistols; my questions are: (1) is this normal for those two guns, and (2)if so, will those triggers “wear in” enough through use to be considered useable in the real world if they’re ever actually needed, or (3) will those triggers need to be replaced before those guns become useable?
I have read about something called the “Apex” trigger. Might that be the best solution for either one or both of those pistols?
Any advice will be appreciated.
My most recent such foray involved a couple who were considering the acquisition of a firearm for home defense, and wanted to know about the desirability of the different kinds. (They were initially enthralled with the idea of a 12 ga. pump, because “the noise will scare them away and we won't have to hurt them.” I explained why it was not a good idea to depend upon that hope.)
I took them to the range and let them shoot four different semi-auto pistols, two revolvers, and two different types of rifle, and talked about and demonstrated the design and operational differences, and the advantages and disadvantages, of the two types of handguns.
Prior to our second trip to the range they notified me that they had “jumped the gun” a bit, so to speak, decided that a 9mm semi-auto would be best for their needs and abilities, and went out and purchased one apiece, a Ruger SR9c and an S&W M&P9 Shield.
We went back to the range and they each put 100 rounds through their respective purchases, and did reasonably well considering their lack of experience and the conditions of the pistols.
And the latter is the problem I’m dealing with. The triggers on both those guns are terrible. The S&W feels like a two-stage trigger, and once the slack is taken up it feels like it’s being pulled through gravel. The Ruger has a long, tough pull that feels like winching an upside-down Edsel across a half-mile of wrecking yard.
I have no prior experience with either of those pistols; my questions are: (1) is this normal for those two guns, and (2)if so, will those triggers “wear in” enough through use to be considered useable in the real world if they’re ever actually needed, or (3) will those triggers need to be replaced before those guns become useable?
I have read about something called the “Apex” trigger. Might that be the best solution for either one or both of those pistols?
Any advice will be appreciated.