Current issue 9mm ammo for FBI?

Kleanbore said:

Government proposals are usually page or word limited

Click to expand...

Kleanbore said:

There is nothing in the FAR that prohibits the limitation of pages or words, and the DAR has been defunct for a long, long time.

Click to expand...

So why would they be ''usually' page or word limited' as you said?

It strikes me as odd to read that considering I've never seen any indication of it in over 2 decades, spanning over 3 decades, of working with 4 branches of the military, DOD, NASA JPL and most of the prime aerospace contractors, DESC, DOT, federal funded oil & gas, airlines and NTSB, to name a few, that all had to follow FAR &/or DFAR.



BTW, I said and linked to DFAR, not DAR.

DFAR latest revision is 05/21/21 as noted toward the top of the 1st page in the link.

DFAR, as well as FAR, is still very much in use everyday including today.

Kleanbore said:

Every one I ever saw from the Air Force was so limited.

It's not a regulatory issue.

Click to expand...

I've never seen that from the Air Force at either company I worked for that dealt with the Air Force.

It must be that the Procurement group you interact with is usually lazy and not want read.

That's a shame as it really only benefits the Procurement groups time by inserting the limitation.

Kleanbore said:

We never thought so.

There are certainly other cogent reasons.

Click to expand...

Matter of opinion.

Shut 'er down Clem, she's a-pumpin' mud!

I think this thread is circling the drain.