DonP
Member
Considering that Chapman is a member of the Trib Editorial Board, this columns is kind of stunning. The link is here if anyone wants to read the enitre column.
We had another round of killings last night on the South Side followed by another press conference with the new Police Commissioner, followed by the usual calls for banning .50 caliber rifles and assault weapons throughout the state.
Link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0424...
City misfires on gun violence
Steve Chapman
April 24, 2008
When a rash of gun murders takes place, it makes sense for the police to do one of two things: renew tactics that have been effective in the past at curbing homicides, or embrace ideas that have not been tried before. But those options don't appeal to Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis. What he proposes instead is a crackdown on assault weapons?
I'm tempted to say this is the moral equivalent of a placebo—a sugar pill that is irrelevant to the malady at hand. But that would be unfair. Placebos, after all, sometimes have a positive effect. Assault weapons bans, not so much?
If there are too many guns in Chicago, it's not because of any statutory oversight. The city has long outlawed the sale and possession of handguns. It also forbids assault weapons. If prohibition were the answer, no one would be asking the question.
(edit)
Gun control hasn't worked as a remedy for crime. So what makes anyone think the answer is more gun control?
We had another round of killings last night on the South Side followed by another press conference with the new Police Commissioner, followed by the usual calls for banning .50 caliber rifles and assault weapons throughout the state.
Link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0424...
City misfires on gun violence
Steve Chapman
April 24, 2008
When a rash of gun murders takes place, it makes sense for the police to do one of two things: renew tactics that have been effective in the past at curbing homicides, or embrace ideas that have not been tried before. But those options don't appeal to Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis. What he proposes instead is a crackdown on assault weapons?
I'm tempted to say this is the moral equivalent of a placebo—a sugar pill that is irrelevant to the malady at hand. But that would be unfair. Placebos, after all, sometimes have a positive effect. Assault weapons bans, not so much?
If there are too many guns in Chicago, it's not because of any statutory oversight. The city has long outlawed the sale and possession of handguns. It also forbids assault weapons. If prohibition were the answer, no one would be asking the question.
(edit)
Gun control hasn't worked as a remedy for crime. So what makes anyone think the answer is more gun control?