I see it all the time, the comparisons of 10mm to 41/44 Mags, its not even close when you compare apples to apples (i.e. full house loads). I love the 10mm but I've got to have a foot down on reality. It's a 357Mag performance in a semi-auto platform, which is why I don't really understand 10mm in a revolver, but there are those that really enjoy them as well. I have full confidence in my Glock 40 for my needs of woods protection. Now if I'm hunting in Alaska which may never happen but who knows, my Ruger Alaskan in 454 Casull gets the nod.
The underlined and bold statement is the 10mm "claim to fame" and where it's worth should be understood. I can cherry pick loads to make 9mm equal 357magnum, or 40 S&W equal 10mm, direct comparisons matter if one wants to find the truth of the matter.