Disclaimer: I didn’t have much luck Googling this question, and I am afraid of high biases to ask in either the 1911forum or HKPro forums, so here we go. I am not asking which is better – they both have their strengths.
I will agree that 1911 was built for as is safest to carry cocked and locked. The USP (and I think the new HK45) pistols are able to carry cocked and locked as well. However, one big difference is the grip safety. The 1911 has the grip safety included as a factor, not just relying on the manual thumb safety. Does this mean that it may be safer for CCW than the USP?
Sorry, I don’t mean to start a “mine is better” match, just asking a straight safety question. I know training is key and a proper holster could include one that covers the manual safety lever. But all things being equal…could the 1911 have the edge here in a condition one carry situation?
Thanks,
Scott
I will agree that 1911 was built for as is safest to carry cocked and locked. The USP (and I think the new HK45) pistols are able to carry cocked and locked as well. However, one big difference is the grip safety. The 1911 has the grip safety included as a factor, not just relying on the manual thumb safety. Does this mean that it may be safer for CCW than the USP?
Sorry, I don’t mean to start a “mine is better” match, just asking a straight safety question. I know training is key and a proper holster could include one that covers the manual safety lever. But all things being equal…could the 1911 have the edge here in a condition one carry situation?
Thanks,
Scott