Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

22 mag rifle for home defense?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Dr_2_B, Oct 29, 2008.

?

22 magnum for home defense rifle?

Poll closed Jan 27, 2009.
  1. Yes, 22 magnum would be a good home defense rifle (especially for the recoil-sensitive)

    3 vote(s)
    7.5%
  2. Well, 22 magnum would be a decent home defense rifle (especially for the recoil-sensitive)

    11 vote(s)
    27.5%
  3. No, I wouldn't recommend protecting a home to a 22 magnum rifle (even for the recoil-sensitive)

    23 vote(s)
    57.5%
  4. Other: please elaborate

    3 vote(s)
    7.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dr_2_B

    Dr_2_B Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    midwest
    I'm a sucker for this kinda stuff. Remember years back when some people were equating a 22mag mini revolver to a .38 special for defense? They were ill-informed but I'm still interested in anyone's thoughts on a 22 magnum rifle for home defense. It's a varmint round, but so is the .223. Who would go for such a thing for, say, recoil sensitive people?
     
  2. Shawnee

    Shawnee member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
    The compact semi-autos like the Remington 597 or Ruger 10/22 in .22 magnum could be an ugly surprise for some thug.

    :cool:
     
  3. Timthinker

    Timthinker Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    815
    While both the .22 Magnum and .223 are considered varmint cartridges, there is a huge difference between the muzzle energy, as measured in foot pounds, produced by these cartridges. A .22 Magnum will produce over 330 foot pounds of energy when fired from a rifle. The .223 will produce over four times that energy!:eek: Now, I concede that a .22 Magnum round is superior in performance to the .22 long rifle when both cartridges are fired from longarms of comparable barrel length. But reliable .22 Magnum semi-auto rifles are not that common. Look at what happened when Ruger attempted to produce magnum versions of its popular 10/22 carbines. Also, .22 Magnum ammo is not as cheap as that of its smaller rimfire brother the .22 long rifle.

    Sure, a Remmy 597 could give an intruder "an ugly surprise", but a more compact firearm such as a S&W 686 could do the same in a smaller package. Now, I like the .22 Magnum cartridge, but I believe there are better calibers for a home defense rifle.


    Timthinker
     
  4. TCB in TN

    TCB in TN Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    Middle, TN
    I wouldn't sneeze at a .22mag rifle for home defense if its what you have, but if you can handle the .22mag in a rifle/carbine, then you can handle a 9mm, which is much better. And the last time I priced a good semi .22mag I found that you can certainly get a Ruger PC9, or Kel Tec, or 2 Hi-Points for the same money, in fact you can come close to a Berreta Storm, and IMHO all will leave you far better off.
     
  5. JT'sDad

    JT'sDad Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    134
    While I have a sweet little Taurus Model 72 Carbine, pump-action 22mag, it is not my bump-in-the-night go to gun. That being said it is ready to go if the need arises.
     
  6. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,575
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    As TCB pointed out, a 9mm carbine would be more effective and recoil would be comparable. And rimfires have a reputation for less reliable ignition than centerfires as well, though failures to fire are undoubtedly rare.

    If you already have a .22 mag autoloader, it would work in that role, but if you are going to go out and buy one, a 9mm would be better IMO.
     
  7. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    No.

    Invest in something more suitable.
     
  8. scotjute

    scotjute Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    563
    Location:
    Texas
    I wouldn't recommend it, but it would probably do ok.
    For the recoil sensitive, I'd recommend .357 rifle.
    .22 mag in a rifle is a good varmit round and seems to work even for large varmits. I like the .22mag for its flat trajectory and accuracy out to 100+ yds. Don't think I've ever had a round fail to fire. It seems reliable enough to me.
     
  9. jwxspoon

    jwxspoon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    451
    Location:
    Myrtle Beach, SC
    If necessary I would happily use my Henry Golden Boy in .22 Mag for defense. However, given the choice I would pick a more effective weapon.

    jw
     
  10. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    If it's your only firearm it's better than a stick, but if home defense is a concern I wouldn't make that your only firearm.
    I seem to recall an incident where a homeowner dumped the 10rd mag from his 10/22 (probably 22lr) into a drugged up bad guy and then had to beat him with the rifle to stop the threat.
     
  11. KC0QGL

    KC0QGL Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Greeley,CO
    If it was the only gun handy, sure. A .223 would be better or .410 semi-auto.
     
  12. TAB

    TAB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,475
    I would not feel underguned by any means, but not my 1st choice.
     
  13. RobertRogers

    RobertRogers Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    34
    A gun in hand will deter 99% of the criminal element. The remaining 1% it will likely not matter what you have, you will have to use it. A magnum against bare flesh will do just fine, maybe not as well as a 12 gauge but I still would not want to be on the receiving end.
     
  14. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,282
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Adding self-defense to my list of reasons for a .22 Mag would mean buying a semi-auto.

    If I had to use it in that mode, I would have developed the skill to make that little doofer sound like a sewing machine--and a pretty tight group as the result.

    "Quantity has a quality all its own."

    Art
     
  15. mgkdrgn

    mgkdrgn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,914
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    If that is all you have, then it's better than a sharp stick. But, how many homes that have guns ONLY have a 22 Mag rifle?

    Just about any "beat to hell ugly but still functions" shotgun will beat a 22mag any day of the week and twice on Sunday as an HD weapon of choice.

    That said, I do -carry- a 22Mag pistol. Why? Because it fits in my front pocket and it's better than a sharp stick. :evil:
     
  16. cbrgator

    cbrgator Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,525
    if you're recoil sensitive just get a .223
     
  17. BADUNAME37

    BADUNAME37 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,434
    If the magazine holds 20 rounds (tube) or even 10 (clyinder-type), just empty the gun on the bad guy and hope there isn't a second bad guy.

    After a few shots to the face, I think the bad guy would get the message that this is not too much fun (that is, if he survives the facial shots):eek:.
     
  18. CountGlockula

    CountGlockula Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,522
    Location:
    In a Los Angeles coffin.
    It all depends on what the shooter can handle. I learned a great lesson last night when taking a newb to the range. I started her off on a Glock 19 and it was too heavy for her, she's 5' tall 95 lbs. and very petite. She was happy with a Ruger Mark III.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page