streakr
Member
This is one of the best reasons for internet firearms sales. Deals made, money comes in, FA goes to FFL who performs backgrounds.
I only sell online or to people I know.
s
I only sell online or to people I know.
s
This is one of the best reasons for internet firearms sales. Deals made, money comes in, FA goes to FFL who performs backgrounds
I don't like the NICS system either but lying and spreading propaganda is a Brady strategy.And a good share of the denials are good people who maybe didn't pay a traffic ticket or some other trivial crap.
I don't like the NICS system either but lying and spreading propaganda is a Brady strategy.
Who's lying? You don't think a bench warrant from an unpaid speeding ticket will result in a denial? And you don't think that such minor offenses aren't often the issue?
F-Trooper = F-****Bogie said:...Agent Schmuckatelli over at F-Troop...
That's stupid that you, as a gun vendor, are indirectly employed to do the law enforcement agency's work for them. First, they aren't rewarding you for it. Secondly, what someone does in traffic or that someone goes out for that proverbial pack of cigarettes and doesn't come back, doesn't have anything to do with your relationship to your clients. Maybe, all gun owners should sign a petition making the Social Security Department responsible for deriliction on civil infractions. Wouldn't it be more effective to threaten civil violators with the deduction of past fines and child support payments from future pensions than to literally force a potential client to own an unregistered firearm derived from potentially shady sources?TAB said:...Out of the remaining 10% I would say 9% of that was for things like unpaid child support
And this is why you NEVER meet at your home to sell anything.
Wal Mart parking lots are good, Starbucks, Home Depot......very public areas.
Good thing is he's probably all hot air. If he was a REAL bad boy he wouldn't have left.
That's stupid that you, as a gun vendor, are indirectly employed to do the law enforcement agency's work for them. First, they aren't rewarding you for it. Secondly, what someone does in traffic or that someone goes out for that proverbial pack of cigarettes and doesn't come back, doesn't have anything to do with your relationship to your clients. Maybe, all gun owners should sign a petition making the Social Security Department responsible for deriliction on civil infractions. Wouldn't it be more effective to threaten civil violators with the deduction of past fines and child support payments from future pensions than to literally force a potential client to own an unregistered firearm derived from potentially shady sources?
I apologize if I am incorrect. I just can't comprehend that the NICS system would apply in such a way. The only prohibited persons that could apply to not paying a speeding ticket would be:Who's lying? You don't think a bench warrant from an unpaid speeding ticket will result in a denial? And you don't think that such minor offenses aren't often the issue?
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 44 > § 922
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
....(2) is a fugitive from justice; ....
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 44 > § 921 Definitions:
(15) The term “fugitive from justice” means any person who has fled from any State to avoid prosecution for a crime or to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 44 > § 922
(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—
(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and
(B)
(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or
(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
I called the local ATF office a couple of weeks ago, this is what they told me as far as private transfers go: You probably should get a bill of sale and some information from the buyer, but none is required. If the ATF shows up wanting to know why a rifle registered to you was used in a crime, they have no recourse if you sold it. There is no way of actually knowing if a person is a felon or adjudicated mentally defective if they seem to act normal and aren't wearing an orange jumpsuit issued by the county.the way i understand the gun sell laws FTF is i cant sell to a known felon, a known mental patent, a minor, OR SOMEONE OUT OF MY STATE
The ATF said you can not sell a firearm you did not buy intending to use. Shoot a few rounds through it to see if you like it. "What if I bought and sold 30 guns last month?" Just trying to find one I like, sir.Agent Schmuckatelli over at F-Troop frowns mightily upon those folks who run a business selling guns without an FFL
I personally require a valid LTC or CCW.There is no way of actually knowing if a person is a felon or adjudicated mentally defective if they seem to act normal and aren't wearing an orange jumpsuit issued by the county.
That's pretty much how it used to be, way back when. Nowadays, I hear people are taking a heavy fall for posession of soft drugs or for commiting economic crimes. Of course, all of wich are non-violent. In states like Arizona, simply forgetting your driver's licence at home is enough to land you in Governor Schmuckatelli's Pink Panty Zoo.ServiceSoon said:...considering the defintion for the term "crime punishable by a term exceeding one year" which seems to waive non-violent crimes...
Yeah but we know he doesn't have a gun
And he knows the OP does.
And he knows the OP called the cops, which means he's been identified and he knows it.