I'm planning on buying a 9mm for home defense, and just general shooting/plinking I'm looking at these 3 guns:
the Hi-Point 9mm carbine, the MPA 9mm pistol on this site:
http://www.auctionarms.com/search/displayitem.cfm?itemnum=7513753
and a Ruger P89 two tone.
I'm definitely wanting to spend under $400 and I need something that is fairly accurate and reliable and has high capacity magazines available. The MPA looks like a real clunker, but it uses inexpensive and commonly available (at least for me) 30rd Sten gun mags. I think there are 30 rounders available for the P89 as well, and 15 rounders are available for the hi-point. The Hi-point looks like the cheapest option and I've heard that it can out perform guns costing hundreds more. I've never been much of a fan of pistol caliber carbines, but If I went with The Hi-Point I could afford to put some after market accessories on it like a 4x scope and one of those stocks from ATI
My question is which of these would you choose and why?
the Hi-Point 9mm carbine, the MPA 9mm pistol on this site:
http://www.auctionarms.com/search/displayitem.cfm?itemnum=7513753
and a Ruger P89 two tone.
I'm definitely wanting to spend under $400 and I need something that is fairly accurate and reliable and has high capacity magazines available. The MPA looks like a real clunker, but it uses inexpensive and commonly available (at least for me) 30rd Sten gun mags. I think there are 30 rounders available for the P89 as well, and 15 rounders are available for the hi-point. The Hi-point looks like the cheapest option and I've heard that it can out perform guns costing hundreds more. I've never been much of a fan of pistol caliber carbines, but If I went with The Hi-Point I could afford to put some after market accessories on it like a 4x scope and one of those stocks from ATI
My question is which of these would you choose and why?