Joejojoba111
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,056
I don't understand, was the kid found dead sitting inside a building, or was the man carrying her when he ran out shooting at the officers???
And I can understand and respect the opinions that disagree, but in the same note I'm still going to respectfully disagree that it should ever, ever ever, be considered to fire when a child is in or near the bullet path.
Well, maybe 100 or 1000 people, that might be a fair trade 'never ever' is a little strong. If shooting would save a thousand people I could see it being justified. And since I find I'm actually flexible here, I'll assume that under duress I'd be flexible down to hundreds or even dozens of people saved. But that's absolute rock-bottom.
And to be fair, no policy maker will ever write down a formula showing how many lives must be saved to justify risking a toddler, so the police were working perhaps without firm guidance.
And I can understand and respect the opinions that disagree, but in the same note I'm still going to respectfully disagree that it should ever, ever ever, be considered to fire when a child is in or near the bullet path.
Well, maybe 100 or 1000 people, that might be a fair trade 'never ever' is a little strong. If shooting would save a thousand people I could see it being justified. And since I find I'm actually flexible here, I'll assume that under duress I'd be flexible down to hundreds or even dozens of people saved. But that's absolute rock-bottom.
And to be fair, no policy maker will ever write down a formula showing how many lives must be saved to justify risking a toddler, so the police were working perhaps without firm guidance.