**** man. A good number of gun users can’t even do that.MY head would literally explode if Joe Biden could coherently show me he understands the legal difference between an AR rifle, pistol, or SBR.
Yes, the buck stops with his desk and he will willingly sign any antigun bill Congress manages to ram through, regardless of actual content.
Ya, and they aren't signing bills into law for their fellow proles, er....citizens. If they were, I would fully expect them to understand what they were signing.**** man. A good number of gun users can’t even do that.
Merely acknowledging that it exists and pointing out its extent. One needn't like the cage, nor even approve of it to have a proper picture of it. Pretending it doesn't exist, or pretending that it's bigger than it really is, is pointless.Arguing over the trimming of the gilded cage.
You're always making excuses for anti gunners and saying they won't do anything, well. Joe and history speak differently.Don't underestimate Biden. He has it more "together" than you might think. That said, I don't think he's a fanatic antigunner. He's trying to balance the demands of his base with the needs of the larger electorate. Pistol braces might get restricted, but nothing more dramatic than that is going to be done against guns. His priorities are elsewhere.
What we see here is the usual alarmism -- on both sides -- trying to ramp up the money machine.
He certainly doesn’t need any votes to do what he’s doing now: Votes don't matter to the ATF. They can make up rules, we get to suffer under them, and then at some point down the road, maybe, just maybe, some court will say it’s unconstitutional. Backwards dystopia.Lets hope our resident Biden fans are right and he can’t get the votes (a dumb reason to vote for avowed anties), but rest assured they will try, just like they did under Obama. If they succeed, well, I hope you’re ready to turn in guns or become a criminal.
Call and write your representatives folks. It’s game on, don’t doubt that.
Senate Democrats are struggling for the total unity they need on major infrastructure and elections bills. Their gun control point man is determined to avoid that kind of quicksand.
Instead, Democrats are preparing to vote on a scaled-down guns bill — most likely a curtailed plan to boost background checks for firearm buyers. The goal is to unite the party and pick up a limited number of Republican votes, even as their effort appears headed towards the same doomed fate as previous proposals to curb gun violence. Despite the all-but-certain GOP filibuster facing Democrats on guns, they’re well aware that a unified 50-vote Senate majority is the only way to put unmitigated political pressure on their opponents.
Not if their functions are rolled into the FBI.Only lawyers and politicians would take something so plainly worded and convolute it to the point that we are now here, blithering on about “points” and, barrel length, and “unusually dangerous” (rolleyes) weapons.
This lunacy has been years in the making. When calls and comments are made, in addition to making specific points, also point out the complete, obvious, idiocy of all of this. Some politicians calling for gutting / getting rid of the ATF seems like a good start.
IOW a de facto registry.The proposal is to make subject subject to the NFA standards. That means applying and purchasing a stamp.
The tide is actually turning toward the pro-gun side. We can see that in what's happening in the Senate, where the usual suspects are paring down the background check bill in hopes of getting Democratic support. (Unanimous Republican opposition is a foregone conclusion.) Certainly the bill can't reach the 60-vote filibuster threshold. At this point the whole thing is about posturing. Nothing will actually get passed.Get ready folks, it's coming.
Good point, but it at least slows them down. It takes time to reorganize oppression.Not if their functions are rolled into the FBI.
PERFECT!If you think this is not really happening.
Let me remind you that at least half the country is in the process of being labeled and investigated as Domestic Terrorists.
We have just spent over a year under a National Emergency footing.
The military has just been used as Protection Against Citizens.
The term "follow the science" has been blathered 24hrs a day for months in supporting a worldwide lockdown.
Same term is merging all data into accessible bases for use by all government agencies to include those researching the
gun violence "epidemic"
What part of any of this do you think will not be used to further ANY AGENDA?
Start writing or start losing.
IOW a de facto registry.
Folks I know that 'Ol Joe and a bunch of Dems & Rhino's would love to ban guns altogether. I doubt this will ever happen. First the LEO and Military can't even keep our cities from being burned down and evidently no body can keep Chicago from killing it's people every single day?? I just don't think that most LEO or Military are going to be coming to your house or mine to confiscate guns. I am very afraid if they did,then these so called assault rifles would then actually be assault rifles. We have got to vote these crazy people out of office. Our country is better than this, we don't need another civil war!!The astronomical gun sales figures speak louder than a few Parkland "survivors" bleating on TV.
Their first target are the self loaders or semi automatics. Next will be the manually loaded/operated repeaters. Banning guns until ONLY single shot 22 rimfire long guns are allowed ONLY at the gun club where they are locked safely away from their owners, except while actually target shooting.
No. It wouldn’t. People will be blithering on about the legalities of their “tacticool” 10-22 aftermarket stock.In all likelihood, a "shooting war" would happen before it came to that.
You get tiresome with all the blather about how anti gun Democrats aren't really anti gun and only want reasonable gun laws, and they don't have the votes, you know, for the children. They don't care one wit about anyone's safety, they prove that every day in what they vote for, they care about disarming you, period. Heck, they don't even lie about it anymore. Joe said so in his campaign, no one should own AR 15s, and that is just the start. They are coming after guns, if not today, tomorrow. Wake up and smell the coffee, stop voting for anti gun politicians, and then making excuses for them.The tide is actually turning toward the pro-gun side. We can see that in what's happening in the Senate, where the usual suspects are paring down the background check bill in hopes of getting Democratic support. (Unanimous Republican opposition is a foregone conclusion.) Certainly the bill can't reach the 60-vote filibuster threshold. At this point the whole thing is about posturing. Nothing will actually get passed.
The astronomical gun sales figures speak louder than a few Parkland "survivors" bleating on TV. The politicians are very good at picking up on indications like this. The antigun camp has to be very, very worried.
Amen! Hannibal is at the gates.You get tiresome with all the blather about how anti gun Democrats aren't really anti gun and only want reasonable gun laws, and they don't have the votes, you know, for the children. They don't care one wit about anyone's safety, they prove that every day in what they vote for, they care about disarming you, period. Heck, they don't even lie about it anymore. Joe said so in his campaign, no one should own AR 15s, and that is just the start. They are coming after guns, if not today, tomorrow. Wake up and smell the coffee, stop voting for anti gun politicians, and then making excuses for them.