Bruce Sterling on The Future

Status
Not open for further replies.

KC

Member
Joined
May 22, 2003
Messages
430
Location
<fnord>
From http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/Sterling1003.asp?p=0
_____________________________
Ten Technologies That Deserve to Die
Some technologies are so blatantly obnoxious that the human race would rejoice if they were summarily executed. A humorist and science fiction writer offers some candidates.

By Bruce Sterling
October 2003

Technologies die rather routinely—seen a Conestoga covered wagon lately?—but it’s rare for them to be singled out and righteously put to death. Some technologies, however, are so blatantly obnoxious that the human race would rejoice if they were obliterated. A wise society would honor its young technical innovators for services rendered in annihilating obsolete technologies that are the dangerous hangovers of previous, less advanced generations. Let me offer some candidates.


1. Nuclear Weapons
One can make some sound arguments for nuclear power—medical radioisotopes are quite handy, while far-traveling spacecraft can barely function on anything less—but there is no reason for us to go on pretending that we need to fry entire chunks of continents. Not only are nuclear weapons technically clumsy, but they betray a blatant death wish better suited to al-Qaeda than a civilization.
Nowadays, a well-organized state can deftly obliterate any conceivable target with exquisite GPS accuracy. Conventional “daisy cutters†and cluster bombs can be scaled up to any size or potency that the military might need. This leaves nuclear bombs with only one ideal function: terrorism. They are excellent weapons for nongovernmental predators to deploy against centers of government. They are quite useless for governments to deploy against terrorists. So why are governments still manufacturing these expensive, dangerous, easily stolen objects?

If all nuclear weapons vanished tomorrow, the world’s current military situation would not be affected one whit. The U.S.A. would still be military top boss. Yet we’d be much less likely to wake up one morning to find Paris or Washington missing.

2. Coal-Based Power
Coal isn’t so much a “technology†as a whole school of them, all of them bad or worse. Coal was the primeval fuel of the industrial revolution. Coal powered the first steam engines, whose killer app was pumping stagnant water out of coal mines. It powered the railroads, whose killer app was moving coal.

Unfortunately, we’ve been doing this coal trick for some two hundred years now, and coal is getting uglier by the day. If your accountants rival Enron’s, you can claim that coal is a cheap fuel. Add in acid rain, climate damage, and medical costs, and it swiftly becomes dead obvious that coal is a menace. Coal spews more weather-wrecking pollutants into the air per unit of energy than any other fossil fuel. Extracting coal destroys vast tracts of land. Coal mining is one of the world’s most dangerous jobs.

If coal vanished tomorrow, we’d miss it: the U.S. would lose a quarter of its energy supplies. But that shortfall, daunting though it is, cannot compare to the ghastly prospect of blackened skies over China and seas rising out of their beds. The sooner we rid ourselves of this destructive addiction, the less we will have to regret.

3. The Internal-Combustion Engine
I have to confess that, as a former denizen of the 20th century, I’ll miss the loud, soul-stirring THRAAAAGH of a two-stroke motorcycle. And liter for liter, calorie for calorie, gasoline is truly the queen of liquid fuels. Nevertheless, if you stand inside a closed garage with any internal-combustion engine, it will kill you. That is bad. Even the best such engines emit an eye-watering stink.

Internal-combustion engines are big and clumsy. They are hard to tune, and they waste a lot of effort carrying their own weight. They’ve got a great incumbent fueling system built into place, but they need to be replaced by hydrogen and fuel cells, technologies that are simpler, safer, and cleaner. If you need really loud, macho engine noises, why not just record them and play them on your car stereo?

4. Incandescent Light Bulbs
In reality, these sad devices are “heat bulbs.†Supposedly a lighting technology, they produce nine times more raw heat than they do illumination. The light they do give, admittedly, is still prettier than the eerie glow of compact fluorescents and light-emitting diodes. But it’s still a far cry from the glories of natural daylight.
Plus there’s the cost of light bulbs, their fragility, the replacement overhead, the vast waste of energy, glass, and tungsten, the goofy hassle of running air conditioners to do battle with the blazing heat of all these round little glass stoves…let’s face it, these gizmos deserve to vanish.

They will be replaced by a superior technology, something cheap, cool, and precisely engineered, that emits visible wavelengths genuinely suited to a consumer’s human eyeball. Our descendants will stare at those vacuum-shrouded wires as if they were whale-oil lanterns.

5. Land Mines
The planet is already cluttered with well-meaning nongovernmental organizations protesting land mines. Their plaint makes perfect sense when you realize that land mines are ideally suited to blowing up peacemakers once a war is over.

During a war, few soldiers step on land mines, because mines are placed by enemies waiting with rifles. Once the armies demob, though, and armies always do, land mines don’t kill combatants anymore. They kill livestock, the brighter and more exploratory kinds of children, and the men and women who wander around after soldiers, attempting to restore the planet to habitability.

There is something to be said for the practice of automating bombs so that people can get killed without any human intervention. After all, there’s a long technical trend there, and it strongly favors advanced societies with engineers over those among us who merely pick up hoes and axes in fits of tribal rage. But it’s stupid to manufacture and spread lethal devices that don’t know when a war is over.

6. Manned Spaceflight
One hates to see this dazzling technology go, but when one resolutely sets the romance aside, there’s not a lot left. Thanks to decades of biological research, it’s now quite clear that flying around the solar system is bad for one’s health. Without the healthy stresses of gravity on one’s skeleton, human bones decay just as they do during prolonged bed rest, while muscles atrophy. Cosmic rays blast through spacecraft walls and human bodies, while solar flares will fry astronauts as diligently as any nuclear bomb. I won’t mention the fact that spacecraft are inherently rickety and dangerous, because that’s a major part of their attraction.


China is about to send her first “taikonaut†into orbit, to belatedly become the world’s third manned space power. As a test of national will and skill, Chinese spaceflight is vastly preferable to, say, invading Taiwan. I promise to watch Chinese manned spaceflight with great interest, and I might even buy the mission patch and decals, but frankly, there isn’t much there there. There haven’t been men or women out of low-earth orbit in some 30 solid years. We don’t seem to miss them in any way that is quantifiable.
There is little point in stepping onto the moon, leaving flags and footprints, and then retreating once again. The staggering price of shipping a kilogram into orbit has not come down in decades. In the meantime, unmanned spacecraft grow smaller and more capable every year. Until we bioengineer ourselves to enjoy cosmic rays, or until we’ve got rockets that can lift a Winnebago made of solid lead, this technology belongs on the museum shelf.

7. Prisons
It’s rather out of style to suggest that people who transgress might be rehabilitated if treated decently. But even if criminals are to be relentlessly punished, removed from the sight of decent people, and kept in a giant, two-million-person ghetto, there are better, cheaper, and more efficient ways than the ones we have.

Newfangled electronic-parole monitors and ubiquitous computing offer plenty of opportunities. These certainly needn’t be seen as sissified kinds of constraints; they could be just as cruel and unusual as anyone might like.

Lose your American internal visa (formerly known as a “driver’s licenseâ€) and you soon find that merchants won’t take your credit, that aircraft won’t transport you, that for all your sunny smiles and good behavior, you are under heavy constraints. American airports have become incarceration centers in all but name, plus you can get a drink there and listen to Muzak. So why do we go through these same ritual gestures with the iron bars, uniforms, and transport trucks? Technically, it’s redundant.

8. Cosmetic Implants
There is something scarily aberrant about puffing up living human flesh by implanting large amounts of an alien substance. Not that people will sacrifice vanity—of course that is out of the question—but any truly advanced medical technology would simply grow the flesh into the desired shape, using the human metabolism, as opposed to injections of window putty. Silicone’s mimicry of flesh—and the same goes for gel, saline, and collagen—is too crude for genuinely cosmetic purposes.

9. Lie Detectors
They just plain don’t work. They might have some vague use in increasing the psychological stress of a subject under interrogation, but galvanic skin response and heart rate have little to do with the process of lying. The use of lie detectors is basically a voodoo ritual that allows large institutions to lie to themselves about the trustworthiness of their employees.

Even if lie detectors did work—say, with newfangled nuclear magnetic-resonance brain scans—they would become an Orwellian intrusion. Furthermore, there would likely be a social revolution as major actors in society, from top to bottom, had to admit to fabricating their lives out of spin and wishful thinking. The official public version of our means, motives, and opportunities is severely divorced from the private world of our interior thoughts. If we were forced to confront and reveal our brain functions through technological means, most of us would soon discover that we led half-baked lives of quiet intellectual desperation, in which very little thought of any kind ever took place.

10. DVDs
The DVD was the most eagerly adopted electronic consumer gizmo in history, but I’d feel bad if I failed to complain about the evil of these things. First and worst, DVDs are unbearably frail. Any benefit one gets from “clearer picturesâ€â€”on what HDTV superscreen, exactly?—is quickly removed by the catastrophic effects of a single thumbprint or scratch. Plus, just like CDs, DVDs as physical objects will prove to warp and delaminate.

Most loathsome of all is the fiendish spam hard-burned into DVDs, which forces one to suffer through the commercials gratefully evaded by videotape fast-forwards. The Content Scrambling System copy protection scheme doesn’t work, and the payoff for pirating DVDs is massive, because unlike tapes, digital data don’t degrade with reproduction. So DVDs have the downside of piracy and organized crime, without the upside of free, simple distribution. Someday they will stand starkly revealed for what they really are: collateral damage to consumers in the entertainment industry’s miserable, endless war of attrition with digital media.

Bruce Sterling is a science fiction author, journalist, and cultural critic based in Austin, TX.
_________________________
This guy would have fit in well with Humboldt Universities' "Campus Center for Appropriate Technology" crowd. On the gripping hand, the 'vision' this guy is known for are odd variant histories, and dystopian cyberpunk.

So far as "regulating technology" goes, that idea did not work for the Chinese, the Ottoman Turks, the Tokugawa Shogunate, or the Co-Dominion. Good job Bruce, way to see the future....
Now go back into your hole. (Dump manned spaceflight, my heavily enfollicled, menalin-deficient posterior.)

[begin starrey-eyed space cadet mode]
"Wanted fan in Luna City, wanted fan on Dune and Down,
Wanted fan at Ophiuchus, wanted fan in Dydee-town.
All across the sky they want me, am I fattered?
Yes I am!
If I could just reach orbit, then I'd be a wanted fan.


"Wanted fan for mining coal and wanted fan for drilling oil,
I went very fast through Portland, hunted hard like Gully Foyle.
Built reactors in Seattle against every man's advice,
Couldn't do that in Alaska, Fonda says it isn't nice.

"Wanted fan for plain sedition, like the singing of this tune.
If NASA hadn't failed us wed have cities on the moon.
If it weren't for f***ing NASA we'd at least have walked on Mars.

And if I can't make orbit, then I'll never reach the stars.


"Nader's Raiders want my freedom, OSHA wants my scalp and hair,
If I'm wanted in Wisconsin, be damned sure I won't be there!
If the E-P-A still wants me, I'll avoid them if I can.
They're tearing down the cities, so I'll be a wanted fan!

"Wanted fan on Chthon and Sparta and the Hub's ten million stars,
Wanted fan for singing silly in a thousand spaceport bars.
If it's what we really want, we'll build a starship when we can;

If I could just make orbit then I'd be a wanted fan.

"Wanted fan for building spacecraft, wanted fan for dipping air,
Sending microwave transmissions, building habitats up there.
Oh the glacier got us last time, next time we'll try to land!
And when the Ice is conquered, it'll be by wanted fans.
And when the stars are conquered, it'll be by wanted fans!"

(Boldface is mine. Lyrics from "Fallen Angles", Pournelle and Niven; Baen Books.
http://www.baen.com/library/067172052X/067172052X_toc.htm. GO READ IT!)

[suspend space cadet mode]
 
" the dangerous hangovers of previous, less advanced generations"

{-- YAWN --} ...snore ....

Liked the Pournelle and Niven, though :cool:

- it's sort of "Heinlein's kids gone punk" :neener:
 
Two stroke motorcycle? ARRRRRRRRRRR.

He needs to straddle a 100 CI, V-twin, 4 stroke, vibrating, noise poluting American iron horse. He'll change his mind.

The ONLY thing better is one of those Alison jet powered bikes.

Nothing beats the whine of a turbine. Pure music to my ears................

Power on, start, temp up................lite the burners...............
 
Austin, TX, is full of latter-day Luddites. It would appear that Mr. Sterling fits this category.

It's easy to criticize, but I notice he offers no viable alternatives to light bulbs, internal combustion engines, or coal-based power.

And I haven't found DVD's to be fragile at all . . . he must be careless with his stuff if his get scratched and delaminated easily.

And as for land mines . . . I think a dense field of them along the US/Mexico border would be quite useful.
 
Look, Mr. Sterling is not dumb. He realizes the current need for most of those technologies, and is merely floating ideas so that others who are more scientifically or politically inclined may come up with replacement technologies.

It seems to me he's gone off the reservation with three of his suggestions, though. Yes, what we really need are antimatter weapons and no way to escape the planet if they're used. :rolleyes: And no prisons? What's going to keep mr. electronically-tracked cereal killer from killing again, hmmm? These are more results of his inability to grasp philosophical points than his leaning toward liberalism. I really doubt he'd support public policy to eradicate most of those items by 2010.
 
Another pseudo-intellectual gone native.

Before Man allegedly messed up the pristine perfection of Nature, human life
was nasty, brutish, and short. It's worrisome that so many nitwits
want to welcome that "state of nature" back with open arms, trashing
our hard-won freedoms in the process.

He need not worry about DVDs, by the way. "Hollywood" plans to
centralize that soon enough. It will all be beamed down from Big Teat
straight to your head.
 
tyme hits it again.

Yup, maybe Mr. Sterling realizes he's no master of the drawing board himself. His intended audience might very well be engineers and inventors.

I remember an interview last year or so in which he spoke about the expectation of loss of freedoms and privacy associated with the spread of some new technologies; sorry, I haven't found a link. The interviewer asked him, "So what's the solution?" His answer was along the lines of, "What makes you think there will be a solution?" - an antidote to the common thought process which pretends that actions might have no associated consequences. The man can think.

Bruce Sterling uses the language well. I like his fiction.
 
So far as privacy, or lack thereof, goes, David Brin has written a fair amount on the subject.
 
I’m always disappointed when I see a science-fiction writer demonstrating such myopic vision … though he’s somewhat right on the couple points regarding our inefficient energy resources.

~G. Fink
 
Not what I expected!

Esp. #6! That's absolute heresy for a sci fi author. But I agree with him on it completely. Bottom line--any expectation that manned space flight will lead to colonies on the Moon or Mars in the next 1,000 years is even nuttier than wishing for the destruction of the internal combustion engine or coal. People--GOOD PEOPLE--are dying to prop up the idiotic fantasies of middle-aged engineers. It's sick.

Landmines aren't evil in and of themselves. However, spreading them at random across the countryside is basically terrorism. It's worse than terrorism, since they continue to kill innocent people for decades after the conflict. If a military plants them, they must take responsibility for detonating them safely or picking them up again.

I think he's very wrong about coal. It can be burned more cleanly, and indeed there are some new residential heaters being developed which would allow houses to use the amazingly cheap and safe fuel for heat with minimal pollution. Besides, the USA has a TON of coal. If we figured out how to use it better, we could be free of mid-east oil.
 
I love how he so convieniently tosses a number of technologies our society relies out the window, yet doesn't offer word one on what to replace them with. Typical. And funny, a number of DVDs that I've bought I'd found had popped out of their holding before I'd opened them, sometimes to some pretty nasty gouges...so far not a single problem playing them.


If NASA hadn't failed us wed have cities on the moon.
If it weren't for f***ing NASA we'd at least have walked on Mars.

And if I can't make orbit, then I'll never reach the stars.

Heheheh. Personally, I think no one has yet summed up NASA as
well as Steve Savitsky, in the Rocket Rider's Prayer:

When the rocket stands before us like a tower of glass and steel
Then no words in any language can express the way we feel
Mingled joy and hope and terror as we're starting on our way
And we suddenly consider that it just might help to pray.

R: So pray to great green Mother Earth and the grim old god of Space,
And the gods of flame and metal whom we've summoned to this place.
Oh you gods of flight and physics, now you have us in your care;
We hope that you will listen to a rocket rider's prayer.

So first let's pray to Vulcan, ugly god of forge and flame,
And also wise Minerva, now we glorify your name,
May you aid our ship's designers now and find it in your hearts
To please help the lowest bidders who've constructed all her parts!

As we're lifting off it's Mercury who'll help us in our need
Not only as the patron god of health and flight and speed
We hope that he will guard us as we're starting on our trip
As the god of Thieves and Liars, like the ones who built this ship.

If we make it into orbit where the sky is starry black
We'll have time to praise old Mother Earth and hope she wants us back
And tell all the other deities who've helped us on our way
That it's nice to visit Heaven, but we didn't come to stay.

Now we're coming down from orbit back to where the air is thick
With no engines and the glidepath of a highly polished brick
And with nothing but those tiles between our hides and flaming Hell,
Better pray to Hell's own Pluto that they glued those suckers well.

So now we're back on Earth again; the sky's a lovely blue.
All you deities we didn't name, you know we love you too.
We hope that you're not angry and you'll keep us in your grace;
We may need your help the next time that we're heading into space.
 
Cosmoline,
[blockquote]Esp. #6! That's absolute heresy for a sci fi author. But I agree with him on it completely. Bottom line--any expectation that manned space flight will lead to colonies on the Moon or Mars in the next 1,000 years is even nuttier than wishing for the destruction of the internal combustion engine or coal. People--GOOD PEOPLE--are dying to prop up the idiotic fantasies of middle-aged engineers. It's sick.[/blockquote]
That's a rather dangerous line of thought. You want us to sit on our hands for the next 1000 years reading drudgereport and using up what limited resources we have left? Maybe by the time our 1000 years of quarantine are up, we won't have any resources left to build a spacecraft to ever get off this hunk of dirt.

We need space exploration. If people are willing to take the risks and as long as NASA (or whoever else is involved) is reasonably truthful about those risks, policymakers have no right to say that it is unethical to send people into orbit or beyond. The problem is not that we're sending people into space. The problem is that we're doing so on a terrible platform (the 20+-year-old shuttle design) for trivial reasons.

We should proceed post haste with a plan to set up a colony on Mars before china does it. This has been theorized quite extensively by the scientific community and by scifi writers. Send a spacecraft to mars that lands on the pole, uses solar power to electrolyze water (ice) into oxygen and hydrogen, and if necessary introduce biological organisms to deal with the harmful chemicals in the atmosphere when there's enough oxygen for them to survive.

There may not be enough ice at the pole to make the atmosphere breathable. This is why people need to think about other solutions. Maybe there are oxygen-rich compounds in the dirt that can be released through clever use of microbes. Maybe the best we can do is create domed colonies.

Saying we won't ever get there in 1000 years is a terrific way to guarantee that we won't.
 
Tyme, the American heart was captured by the race to the moon. I was very young and I still remember my parents watching it on TV. And in the 70s going to a friends house, after high school, and marveling at his fathers complete collection of mission plates. So it's understandable that we confuse manned space flight with exploration, but that doesn't make it right. Gibson certainly was -not- calling for an end to space exploration, he was calling for an end to manned space flight. They are quite distinctly different things.
Boyd Kneeland
 
It’s rather out of style to suggest that people who transgress might be rehabilitated if treated decently.

Not out of style, just frigging stupid. Some people are just evil.

I know longer have any desire to read his books. I did at one time, but if this is the drivel I get in the real world from him, I don't want to see what I get when he's in fantasyland.
 
We need to retain a few nuclear weapons for large scale demolition projects, asteroids, or if Great Cthulhu rises out of the ocean and attacks. And I agree with previous posters that we need to pursue space exploration for the survival of our species. Mars is a feasible goal in the not-too-distant future. Maybe some of the outer moons, too. Advances in genetics will help make a more resilent human body that can survive the harsh environments of spaceships on interplanetary trips.
 
The problem is

We've all been basically brainwashed by decades of sci-fi that manned space flight is not really much different from the first ocean voyages around the planet. The analogy would be correct if the world's oceans had been made of acid, had given of poison fumes, contained no life, AND if the new world on the other side of them was an airless rock with nothing of value on it.

There's nothing out there folks. Even if there were, we were made for THIS planet, no other. Space flight is very possible. We could even start sending probes to other solar systems. But manned space flight overlooks the impossibilty of survival, profit or any future to sending human beings across irradiated vacuum to lifeless, airless rocks.

Again, I sense Malthusian doom and gloom. Do you believe we're going to have too many people to feed?
 
I don't like science fiction either - too much of it is science fantasy these days. But travel within the solar system doesn't require warp drives and other nonsense. The technology to go to Mars (for example) and other close bodies is understood today in principle. If we are going to survive, we have to adapt. We can't put all our eggs in the Earth basket. Humans began as weak, slow savanna monkeys and used technology to adapt to overcome predators, master all climates on the planet and eventually explore everywhere from the Arctic to the sea floor to the highest mountain peaks. We need to use technology to explore space too. Advances in genetics and medicine can help us overcome the rigors of space flight and alien environments. Humans weren't "meant" to live past 30 or so years old either, but we've used our brains to overcome these limitations.
 
Whoever has people in space is occupying the high ground. Since there will never be any end to inter-national power struggles, the high ground is a good place to control...

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top