Citizen aids cop, shoots attacker (multiple threads merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
something that bothers me

Six months earlier he had forced his way into the home of the mother of his son. An accomplice held a gun on her roommate while Temple assaulted his ex-girlfriend in an argument over the child. He was later arrested and charged with simple battery and other misdemeanor charges for the assault. He had so terrified the two women, they had made several complaints to the city police about the beating and threats by Temple, and both had purchased handguns to protect themselves from him.

A lawsuit was filed by the mother of George Temple’s son, accusing Brian Harrison of excessive force in his attempt to effect an illegal arrest, and Stephens of “vigilante” action in coming to the aid of Harrison.

Among the claims listed as a reason for the lawsuit was a “loss of consortium” with Temple.

What??? first she is his victim, and feels the need to buy a gun for protection against him but now she wants to sue because he is gone? anyone else confused/befuddled by this?
 
What??? first she is his victim, and feels the need to buy a gun for protection against him but now she wants to sue because he is gone? anyone else confused/befuddled by this?


She is a opportunist who thinks that she can get some money.
 
“He was a successful man trying to make it in life,” Parker, 22, said. “He always worked hard for what he had; a lot of people love him; it’s sad.”
Correction: he was an a-hole trying to beat up a cop.
 
1.) He protected the officer from "serious bodily injury or death".

2.) The LEO's call for help, once taken up deputized the civilian, the civilian was operating under the color of law in preventing a violent crime from occurring.
 
What??? first she is his victim, and feels the need to buy a gun for protection against him but now she wants to sue because he is gone? anyone else confused/befuddled by this?

Nope, not confused or befuddled. I'm not even flabbergasted.
 
She is a opportunist who thinks that she can get some money

Yeah, that one's not even hard to guess at. Some ambulance chasing lawyer told her she could get rich (and give him a sizable cut) and she went for it
 
And While We're Here

With Harrison continuing to scream for help, and Temple continuing to beat him, Stephens placed his walking cane under his left arm, and took aim with both hands to get a better angle of shot and avoid hitting Harrison. The first shot hit Temple in the left breast, under the nipple. Stephens did not shoot at Temple from the rear as has been frequently stated, but rather from a side position. The bullet entered Temple’s chest, and came out through his clavicle (shoulder blade.) His next three shots struck Temple in the left shoulder and upper back area.

After the four shots, with Temple showing no effect from the four bullets, Stephens again ordered Temple off Harrison. Temple ignored the orders and continued to beat Harrison.

Stephens then took one step forward, reaching within approximately three feet of the men, Temple still viciously beating Harrison. Temple was still on top of Harrison, his left arm on Harrison’s neck, and his right hand and arm under Harrison. As Temple slammed Harrison’s head forward to the pavement and lunged forward with his hand and arm under Harrison, Stephens fired his final shot into Temple’s head behind his ear. The bullet exited the rear of Temple’s head. Stephens said while he did not actually see the gun, other witnesses told him Temple had finally wrested control of the duty Glock from Harrison and was pulling it from under Harrison’s body when Stephens shot him in the side of the head.

At that shot, Temple ceased beating Harrison, and turned, reaching towards Stephens with a look on his face Stephens described as “rage.”

Temple then fell over, off Harrison, and made two attempts to sit back up, looking at Stephens before he collapsed and expired.

And so ends the myth of the .45 as a one shot man stopper
 
Last edited:
Not to make assumptions, but I can imagine what kind of guy this guy was. Young, driving a S550, and a serious temper problem. Sounds like a lot of S550 drivers.

I do not doubt the witness did the right thing, and that the MB driver most likely thought the funeral procession was too important for someone of his righteous and superior standing, and so he probably went around or didn't stop for it or something.

There are essentially only two types of people who drive S550s for the most part. Older people, and then younger men who can be described with a certain four letter word describing a certain part of the male anatomy.

Well okay, I'm sure many will disagree with my last sentence there... I guess I've just worked valet far too long for my own good.
 
The other guy had a few guns in his car. Can we pass judgment on him? Around where I am from your a sicko redneck KKK member looking to shoot minorities if you carry a gun in your car. (I am from Chicagos suburbs.)

Thats the funniest thing I have seen on here in a while... well, not really.

Replace the word "funniest" with the word "dumbest". I guess I wouldn't expect much from Chicago.
 
I am usually the last to cheer when cops get away with shooting people, but this one has a justifiable smell to it. I never got a broken jaw and a week in the hospital from a shouting match or even a fistfight. That is some serious hostility manifesting itself there.

Yes. A fist-fight with a boxer:

Temple’s friend, Willie Parker, said Temple liked to box, had a year-old child and was attending Southern University.

“He was a successful man trying to make it in life,” Parker, 22, said.

No, you got it all wrong. The Brady Campaign says you're supposed to say he's had a troubled past but has recently turned his life around. Get with it, Parker, 22.
 
truth

nobody who isn't either insane or on drugs takes 4-5 shots to the upper body and doesn't flinch...

at that point i think i woulda started considering driving a stake through his heart
 
What I found interesting in the whole of this thread was that a few folks were stereotyping the perp and then some folks here got pissed and started the race thing.

Dudes, I AM taking THR on this. If the shoe fits....

Its really sad that its come to that. The point where we know whats up because the stereotype has actually become THE TYPE of person that were dealing with. The fact that some got their panties in a wad about the stereotyping shows me that they recognize the problem but get mad when someone points it out. Sad.

You have only yourself (collectively) to blame.

I call em like I see em.

Go ahead stereotype me. Im game.
 
The one thing that I find interesting is the witness' story that I believe Art posted on the 3rd page.

The witness indicates that Stephens did not issue a verbal warning prior to opening fire.

The Shootist's page indicates that not only did he (Stephens) issue several verbal warnings, but he also fired multiple warning shots.

I think that either way, it's a justifiable homicide, but it is very interesting to see two radically different sides to the story.
 
2.) The LEO's call for help, once taken up deputized the civilian, the civilian was operating under the color of law in preventing a violent crime from occurring.

That's interesting. Is that an off the cuff thought, or is it based on a legal precedent? If it holds water from a legal standpoint, could it offer some avenue for financial assistance against the lawsuit?

Tuckerdog1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top