Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Man’s arrest on gun charge prompts lawsuit

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Desertdog, Jun 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    We need many more of these lawsuits in places where they may be won.

    Man’s arrest on gun charge prompts lawsuit

    By SONYA KIMBRELL
    Advocate staff writer
    http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/police/3100841.html?showAll=y

    Story originally published in The Advocate


    A Baton Rouge man has filed a civil rights lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the Gonzales Police Department, the Ascension Parish Sheriff’s Office and five Gonzales police officers.

    In the lawsuit, Mark Edward Marchiafava claims he was the victim of false arrest, false imprisonment, assault and battery and unlawful seizure of property.

    Marchiafava said Friday afternoon that on Jan. 28 he was in the parking lot at the Tanger Outlet Mall in Gonzales and was wearing an unconcealed blue-steel .357-caliber Magnum in a holster on his right hip.

    A Gonzales police officer asked Marchiafava why he was carrying a gun and asked for Marchiafava’s driver’s license. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, alleges that the officer checked Marchiafava’s license for violations and returned it. Marchiafava claims that he left as a passenger in a vehicle driven by a friend along with his adult daughter and a child.

    According to the lawsuit, as the vehicle Marchiafava was riding in approached the exit at La. 44, an unmarked Gonzales police unit and four marked police units forced the vehicle onto the median. Five officers surrounded the vehicle and at least one of the officers drew a weapon and aimed it at Marchiafava, the lawsuit says.

    Marchiafava claims he was arrested and taken to the Gonzales police station where he was shackled to a wall.

    He was booked into the Ascension Parish Prison in Donaldsonville on a count of illegal carrying of a weapon. He posted the $200 bail within a few hours and was released.

    Marchiafava, in his lawsuit, claims his constitutional rights under the Second, Fourth and 14th amendments were violated.

    Marchiafava said Friday he also carries a gun for protection. “If you ever need one (a gun), you don’t have time to run home or run to your car,” he said.

    Gonzales Police Chief Bill Landry declined to comment Friday afternoon.

    Ascension Parish Sheriff Jeff Wiley was on vacation and Chief Deputy Tony Bacala would not comment Friday afternoon.

    Ascension Parish deputies were not involved in Marchiafava’s arrest.

    He said the Sheriff’s Office was included in the lawsuit because he was wrongfully imprisoned in the parish jail.
     
  2. Lupinus

    Lupinus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,502
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    good I hope he gets enough to retire and buy a lot more guns and a lifetimes supply of ammo.

    Problem is the county wont care. They know all they need to know is raise taxes and the people who do decide to sue will be scorned when they ask why their taxes are being raised and the county points to the people with lawsuits.
     
  3. deanf

    deanf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    486
    Location:
    N46º 54’ x W122º 34’
    So does anyody know the relevant law?
     
  4. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,732
    There was an article posted on this incident a month or so ago. There were some law references in that thread.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2006
  5. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    The Law

    14:95 is still valid.

    A. Illegal carrying of weapons is:

    (1) The intentional concealment of any firearm, or other instrumentality customarily used or intended for probable use as a dangerous weapon, on one's person; or

    (2) The ownership, possession, custody or use of any firearm, or other instrumentality customarily used as a dangerous weapon, at any time by an enemy alien; or

    (3) The ownership, possession, custody or use of any tools, or dynamite, or nitroglycerine, or explosives, or other instrumentality customarily used by thieves or burglars at any time by any person with the intent to commit a crime; or

    (4) The manufacture, ownership, possession, custody or use of any switchblade knife, spring knife or other knife or similar instrument having a blade which may be automatically unfolded or extended from a handle by the manipulation of a button, switch, latch or similar contrivance.

    (5)(a) The intentional possession or use by any person of a dangerous weapon on a school campus during regular school hours or on a school bus. "School" means any elementary, secondary, high school, or vo-tech school in this state and "campus" means all facilities and property within the boundary of the school property. "School bus" means any motor bus being used to transport children to and from school or in connection with school activities.

    State v. Fluker
    The appropriate test to be applied in prosecutions for illegal carrying of weapons is whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case as disclosed by the evidence, the manner in which defendant carried the weapon evinced an intent to conceal its identity. Applying this interpretation of the statute to the facts of this case, we find no evidence of an intentional concealment of the weapon. Defendant wore the gun in a holster on his hip in open view. The gun was exposed, except for that portion in the holster. There was no attempt to conceal its identity. It was fully admitted by the arresting officers that the weapon was sufficiently exposed to be fully recognizable as a pistol. Hence, we find no evidence to substantiate this conviction.

    State v. Fluker, 311 So.2d 863 (LA 1975).

    Defendant wore the gun in a holster on his hip in open view. The gun was exposed, except for that portion in the holster. There was no attempt to conceal its identity.

    The most important excerpt you are looking for from the case above.


    Another case

    In the instant case, we find no evidence of defendant's intentional concealment of the weapon on his person. Defendant wore the pistol in his waistband in plain view in such a way that it was immediately recognizable as a gun. This manner of openly carrying the pistol contradicts a finding that defendant intended to conceal the weapon. When defendant removed the pistol from his waistband and placed it on the window ledge, the weapon was in full view. Finally, when defendant placed the pistol in his wife's open purse on the floor, it was clearly visible to anyone who passed by. The placement of the pistol in the purse in this manner negates a finding that defendant either intended to conceal the weapon or have the weapon on his person. Hence, we find no evidence to support the conviction.

    State v. Bowen, 376 So.2d 147 (La. 1979).

    Find and Print This One!

    The officer freely conceded at the hearing that he did not have probable cause to arrest defendant Ferrand when he entered the home. The report of drug dealing in the alley way did not identify Ferrand by name or appearance; the alley way was deserted when the officers arrived before Ferrand walked out of his apartment and stood on the porch with the handgun approximately two feet away from his front door; and the officers were not aware at the time of Ferrand's convicted felon status. As the officer acknowledged, the public possession of an openly displayed handgun is not a crime in Louisiana and does not alone provide probable cause for an arrest.

    State v. Ferrand, 664 So.2d 396 (La. 1995).

    Hope that helps. :)
     
  6. stevelyn

    stevelyn Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,290
    Location:
    Fairbanksan in Aleutian Hell
    Mr. Marchiafava posts over on http://www.keepandbeararms.com perhaps we should invite him over.

    I truely hope he gets title and deed for the city of Gonzales for this abuse of power.
     
  7. Mannlicher

    Mannlicher Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,430
    Location:
    North Central Florida and Miami Florida
    If Mark is 'rightous', then I wish him well. There are a lot of unanswered questions with this one though.
     
  8. DKSuddeth

    DKSuddeth Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    777
    Location:
    Bedford, TX
    what questions remain unanswered for you?
     
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Smells like more rampaging government criminality from Louisiana.

    Maybe Jorge can send federal troops in to protect the Second Amendment civil rights of citizens.
     
  10. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    Questions?

    Yeah, what questions?

    He was booked into the Ascension Parish Prison in Donaldsonville on a count of illegal carrying of a weapon. He posted the $200 bail within a few hours and was released.

    Is there another side to the story floating around out there somewhere? Link us to it, please.

    The charge is the law posted above. I don't even see an allegation of any of the five things listed in the statute.
     
  11. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    (1) He was carrying openly.

    (2) There is no allegation that he is an "enemy alien."

    (3) No mention of dynamite.

    (4) No mention of a knife.

    (5) Maybe he was near a school?

    :neener:
     
  12. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    572
    There have been several posts over at packing.org about Louisiana in the last three days. Apparently, this is a more widespread problem than just this one arrest.
     
  13. Sindawe

    Sindawe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,480
    Location:
    Outside The People's Republic of Boulder, CO
    Gonzales settles gun-carrying man’s lawsuit

    Sounds like the settlement is not enough to retire on, but hopefully enough of a sting that those who run the city are promted to remind their police that it is NOT good policy to violate the rights of the citizens.
     
  14. ilbob

    ilbob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    10,905
    Location:
    Illinois
    has been discussed more fully at opencarry.org.

    personally I applaud his spunk. not sure I would want to go through what he did to earn his small settlement. that is of course what "they" are relying on. most of us just are not in a position to face down evil government officials when it really needs to be done.
     
  15. SCKimberFan

    SCKimberFan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,229
    Location:
    South of the Mason-Dixon Line
    I do not want to start a LEO bashing thread, but I have to agree with this statement.
     
  16. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Oh Happy Day! :)

    Let the cops in Gonzales know how you feel:

    http://gonzalesla.com/

    Here's a picture of Chief Landry and his email:

    http://gonzalesla.com/police.html

    gonzpd@eatel.net

    Have fun! :)
     
  17. ilbob

    ilbob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    10,905
    Location:
    Illinois
    Do you think any of them care one whit? It did not come out of their pocket. It was paid by the municipal insurance co-op.
     
  18. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    They may not care, but that didn't stop me from rubbing it in a bit. Told them I was planning my next vacation there, so I could O.C., get arrested, then get a big fat payday from them. If they cost the city *enough* money, the city council will can him. :)
     
  19. mbt2001

    mbt2001 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,902
    Location:
    Texas
    Whether gun is carried concealed or not or with a permit or not, shouldn't the police / courts have to prove or cite some kind of criminal history or nefarious intent on your part? For instance, it isn't legal to constrain speech, unless it isn't true or is dangerous (fire in crowded theater where there is no fire). Take me for instance, me carrying a weapon isn't dangerous to anyone unless the situation is dangerous to me.

    Since yelling fire in a crowded theater is dangerous, but carrying a gun isn't necissarly dangerous, shouldn't they have to prove (as above) some kind of evil / criminal intent?

    I think we have let the law go to far.
     
  20. AntiqueCollector

    AntiqueCollector Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    842
    The police do need to believe a crime is being committed, and when carrying a weapon openly is not illegal, carrying said weapon is not a reason for which they can detain and/or arrest you.
     
  21. FieroCDSP

    FieroCDSP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,146
    Location:
    Wooster, Ohio
    It takes test cases like this for some places to admit open carry is legal there.
    Ohio has dealt with this recently and through some hard work by OhioCCW.org and a couple of test cases, the police are starting to fall in line with the law. It not so much ignoring the law as it is misunderstanding it, though there are always those exception that are trying to make a point.
     
  22. deaconkharma

    deaconkharma Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    246
    Location:
    Columbia SC
    If only more people were to stand up and be counted

    Good on ya buddy! Thank you for your service! Yes I consider it a service to your community. Unfortunately though, too bad the tax payers had to foot the bill instead of those directly responsible. I have always had a problem with public funds going to repair what a few overzealous politicians and others do, but I guess it is the public that voted them in and the public must then pay for that decision. I guess I want more of a scalpel to excise the money directly from the individuals' accounts rather than from public funds which punish all, even those that didn't vote for these sods! Sigh... If only I were King/ Dictator :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2008
  23. JDoe

    JDoe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Messages:
    292
    Should the settlements be higher?

    The person that is arrested will still have an arrest record that will follow them for the rest of their life.

    Arrests of the kind described in this thread won't mean much to a middle aged tractor mechanic but to a 23 year old rising star in one of the fields that require a security clearance it could be very damaging.

    I'm no rising star and don't require a security clearance but an arrest record, even if the charges were thrown out would have a negative impact on my career. That's why I toe the line and don't place myself in situations that are likely to get me arrested unlawfully. Wow, that sounds strange to say that!

    I don't think the settlements are high enough because these unlawful arrests keep happening. If the settlements were higher or maybe knowledge of them more widespread perhaps these unlawful arrests would stop happening.
     
  24. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    We, the people need to fire our self-appointed rulers and hire public servants.
     
  25. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    42,991
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    As far as this forum goes, case closed. We don't need drift into philosophical and political views.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page