CNN hates to do it, but they have no choice!

[Diggers]

I doubt you will see anything on ccw come from this. In fact does anyone know IF she even does have a ccw?

She was a church member acting as volunteer security for her church, would she even need one on church grounds?

Anyhow if it does come up they will just say "she had a permit to carry a gun."

I agree with others that the focus will be on the bad guys guns, what kind and where he got them.

 

[The Gunman]

I don't care if she was paid, unpaid, private or whatever. This is how things should be, an honest citizen bearing arms in defense of themselves and others.

 

[ZeSpectre]

Hrmmm, looks like the story has already been changed to stress that the gunman killed himself.
Personally I preferred the focus on the hero and only a few bits of info about the murderer.

 

[charon]

What is odd, is that they are not actually talking that much about the specific gun. You would think that would be about as "important" to the media here as it was in the mall shooting.

It's been stated that the shooter had a shotgun (at least earlier reports) but not in later reports. Could it be that the main weapon he used was actually a shotgun? Have to check and see if the generically referenced weapon is being called an assault weapon or assault rifle.

A shotgun, even one of those Sagia's get a bit close to the whole "don't scare the hunters" angle.