Matthew Temkin
Member
My main reason of owning pistols is self defense so the vast majority of my practice is 0-10 feet.
Susie,here's what worked for me.
i started at 7 yards, then stayed there til i was happy with the groups.
then to 8 yards. i kept doing this to 25 yards.
then, i added 5 yards at a time to get to 50 yards.
this was not fast fire.
then, i started point shooting. i started at 1 yard, shooting charcoal lumps because of rattlers.
i then started adding 1 yard again. i'm now working at 9 yards.
i think the important thing is to use small targets. i use 4'' targets.
last time i checked, i got a 4 1/4'' group at 7 yards, shooting as fast as i could n drawing as fast as i could.
this took more than 4.000 practice rounds because point shooting is hard for me.
my big trick is to get a 22 so you can afford thousands of practice
rounds.
it took more than 8,000 rounds for me to get 2'' groups at 25 yards.
i don't have much talent for shooting but it looks like a good work ethic will do.
Since we are in the "Strategies, Tactics and Training" sub-forum with a presumed personal protection reason for training, I disagree.
Yes, from a raw square range marksmanship perspective, if you can shoot decent groups at 25yds (say 6"-8" or so centered on your POA), then shooting small groups at 3-10 would seem easy.
The problem is that actual combat marksmanship and gun-fighting needs are a lot different than shooting paper on a range. The majority of gunfights happen in the 7 FOOT range. Yes, hitting a bullseye is easy. However, drawing while moving under life or death pressure while trying to hit a moving person trying to kill you, perhaps in low light, perhaps with a small gun with small sights, is a totally different problem that requires training via different methods (including, but going well beyond, raw marksmanship).
You should practice longer range shots, but it should not be the majority of your practice if you are training for personal protection.
As to your target, I would say that 25yds is too far for you to practice right now. Your shots aren't close enough to diagnose the issues. Probably trigger squeeze and/or anticipating the shot.
Bring it back in, even to 3-7yds and really dial in your grip, stance, and trigger press. Then move it back out on occasion.
Ironically, something like the "Venti 100" drill which is done at only 3yds (muzzle only 6ft from the target!) would really help your distance shooting a lot. It isn't so much about the distance as the fundamentals.
Edit: Great target you have. I'm a big fan of targets that show anatomy (that can't be seen at shooting distances) that are also armed. As an anatomical note, the first shots weren't "center mass" but "center-chest" (which is what we want, center mass would be too low). The orange dot you placed on the head is way too high, that is the thickest part of the skull where the bullet could glance off and also not where the brain centers are that control autonomic functions.
See the rounded shape below the eyes? That represents the mid-brain, PONs and cerebellum. That is where you want the hits to go. Draw a triangle from the eyes with the point at the top of the upper lip. On an actual face, I just aim for the tip of the nose or the nose in general.
If your groups are small in simulated defensive shooting, you are not firing rapidly enough.Moving a target close doesn't simulate a close range shooting. It just builds false confidence because it makes your groups appear smaller.
Target shooting at longer ranges, even if you use a rather large target, is better practice because it forces you to concentrate on the front sight since the focal distance between target and gun are much larger. In a real fight your attacker is not going to be so easy to focus on as a well lit, high contrast target at 7 yards.
It may be accepted, but it doesn't make any sense. The only difference between a flat sheet of paper 5 yards from you or 10, 15, 25 is the focal length. If we were using realistic targets it would be a different situation.If your groups are small in simulated defensive shooting, you are not firing rapidly enough.
It may sound counterintuitive to say that shooting at longer ranges will likely not help much in close quarter encounters, but that is pretty widely accepted.
And to say that moving a target close does not simulate a close range shooting doesn't make much sense, except for the missing aspect of having a moving target.
The only difference between a flat sheet of paper 5 yards from you or 10, 15, 25 is the focal length. If we were using realistic targets it would be a different situation.
The thing is, at 7 yards some folks can hip shoot much smaller groups than have been posted in this thread. This makes me doubt that the fundamentals of sighting are really getting much exercise.
One thing I have observed in IDPA is that even reasonably good shooters' groups open up considerably at close range targets. I'm not shooting any slower than them, but my 5 yard rapid groups are tight clusters while they end up dropping points. I don't see why that is happening unless shooting close is a crutch.