HB closed the thread, but I wanted to clarify one point:
A Leo involed in a shooting, will not talk to an investigator withg out representation. why should you?
If you think you are going to be in "control" of your mouth post shooting, think about how you feel or react post a MVA.
Is this what happens when a LEO is involved in a shooting? If so, should it be different for a non-LEO? And if so, why?
When a LEO is involved in a shooting 'round here, the LEO will make a VERY basic statement of fact at the time. To wit: "I was roughly here, he was roughly there. He had a gun, I shot him. I think there were some people over there who may be witnesses."
The purpose of this is to give the investigators a very general idea about what happened, so they know the scope of the scene and where to look for witnesses and physical evidence.
This is generally what a defensive shooter should do as well. The cops need to know who shot, so they know that no one else is involved (either as sender or recipient of bullets). The cops need to know, generally, where the shooting happened. The cops do not need to know immediately WHY you shot, beyond "I was in fear of my life".
Make a brief, general statement, request your attorney, and SHUT YOUR MOUTH. This is exactly what the LEOs do, and it's exactly what you should do.
IANAL, and you really should consult with one prior to contemplating defensive use of a handgun. Besides, if you say you want your lawyer, their first question will be "OK, who is it?" You should probably have an answer.
Now is not the time to open up the yellow pages and flip to AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1+ Bail Bonds, Criminal Defense, Paternity & Divorce, LLC. You want someone who knows whatthe heck he is doing, not someone who knows how to do an arraignment with low bond and negotiate a good plea.
Again, this is not to get this thread fired back up again, it is merely to clarify that point. You should do what the cops do: VERY general statement, request a lawyer, politely decline to answer further questions.
Mike