Here's a question, how did you get your first training and do you think women in general learn better in women-only classes?
That wasn't directed at me, but I'll answer it anyway. That "woman in general," whoever she is, has caused me a lot of personal grief over the years ...
My personal experience is that "women in general" may have an easier time learning to shoot than "men in general" -- but that
I am not women in general, I'm
me, and I had a heckuva hard time of it. I'm not a natural shot, and had to work very hard for the little I've learned. I was proud of myself for placing within the low 20's at the very crowded GSSF match in Shelton last year, and have no real reason to believe that unless there's a miracle I'll ever do much better than that. I'm naturally slow, clumsy, slightly cross-eyed, and not a bit athletic. My fine motor skills stink. So it's not surprising that I find shooting, which is primarily a fine motor skill, to be very challenging.
It may be encouraging to "women in general" to be told that they're more likely to be good at shooting initially than men are. For me it was pure frustration, because here I was
supposed to be able to do this thing as a kind of genetic inheritance, and it turned out I had to really and truly work at it!
When it came to classes, the first class I took was a two-day class, intended for people already familiar with their weapons but still new to the world of shooting. I'd owned a gun for about three months at that time, and I took the class with one of my male buddies. The only other woman in the class of twenty was a 60-something lady who had terrible arthritis in both hands, and who really struggled to keep up. She soaked up a lot of instructor attention, but did manage to pass the qual at the end. I wasn't uncomfortable being around mostly guys -- all my closest friends always have been male -- but I think that woman might have benefited from the more friendly/cooperative atmosphere a women-only class usually has.
In my experience, co-ed classes tend to be more competitive, while female-only classes tend to be more cooperative in nature. There are plenty of exceptions to this general rule. But generally, if a woman is comfortable with and undismayed by competition, she'll probably do very well in a co-ed class. If she is usually uncomfortable with competition, she may find herself better off signing up for a women-only class.
Later on, I took a handgun retention & disarms class. That one ... that's a different tale. I
hated taking it with a bunch of guys. I'm not a physical person and I hated having to touch other people's bodies in order to learn the skills. I hated the disarm-the-bad-guy-behind-you move, which could not be done without my upper torso bumping into the guy's arm (like most women, I have some furniture there that kind of gets in the way). I mentioned to the instructors that I would really (really really really) have appreciated taking that class with women instead of co-ed. One of them said, "Yes, we know. But if the skills are to be learned at all, you have to be able to perform them against people of all sizes -- and half the population is men." Good point, but I didn't have to like it. I agree with it now, even, but I still don't like it much.
Since I've been working as a volunteer assistant instructor, I've had the chance to see a lot of women as they begin learning to shoot and to talk with them about their perceptions of the shooting world. I think "women in general" benefit quite a bit from women-only classes, especially at the lower levels, but I do think at some point it is time to move beyond the gender ghetto. I also think some women thrive upon co-ed classes, and would neither enjoy nor benefit from women-only classes.
I think it's usually time to move beyond women-only classes at the point the shooter needs to be pushed a little, rather than mostly reassured and aggressively encouraged. That point happens at different times for different shooters. Women-only classes aren't usually very good at pushing people. Again, that's a generality and I'm sure there are exceptions.
By the way, the women I know who've come to classes because a
female friend talked them into it could be counted on one hand. Most of them have been persuaded, encouraged, bribed, or dragged there by some man -- most often a husband or boyfriend. The exceptions to this are almost all lesbians, most of whom were persuaded to come to the range by their partners. (I'm not one of the exceptions; an old family friend, a man, persuaded me to sign up for my first class.)
My teenage babysitter, learning she was going to watch the kids so I could go to the range, once remarked, "What do you want to learn to shoot and carry a gun for? Guys like guns, girls don't."
I smiled gently and replied, "Girls get raped, guys don't." She got the point.
I just wish more women would.
pax
But when hunter meets with husband, each confirms the other's tale --
The female of the species is more deadly than the male.
-- Rudyard Kipling