Unless we hunt alone, in a fur outfit and hand sewn boots and chase down animals with a spear or rock, we are not truly hunting but rather "gathering"? I know; Reductio ad absurdum.
Hunting has changed in the past 50 years, in most places, and will continue to change/evolve for more reasons than I can think.
Everytime a thread about high fence hunting comes up and someone replies it is not for them, the generic retort by those in favor of high fence hunting is always the same......about hunting naked with spear being the only true form of hunting. No where have I said changes in hunting were bad. No where have I said that I don't hunt using modern methods. I only stated that not all modern hunting methods give a quality hunt, and that a quality hunt had different definitions to different folk.
Seems to me that too many folks seem to confuse "High Fence" with "Pen". There is a heckuva lot of difference between several thousand acres enclosed by a high fence, and a very few acres (single digit) as a high-fenced pen.
I talked earlier about artificially inflated numbers behind high fences as to why, even on large areas of containment, means success is easier than in normal hunting scenarios.
ClickClickD'oh says the state of Texas tells him he can only have 1 deer for every tens acres behind the fence. That works out to be 64 deer per square mile. In Wisconsin we have some of the best natural deer habitat in the world and anything over 40-50 deer per square mile is considered heavily over-populated and can not be sustained without supplemental feeding....thus artificially inflated. Don't know how much of Texas is considered prime natural deer habitat, but I suspect that there is little there that could support those kinds of numbers without supplemental feeding.
As I said before, there are exceptions to high fence enclosures, but even ten thousand acres is not really that large. In Wisconsin, we have a wildlife area named Sandhill. The area was home to the last known wild Passenger Pigeon and the preserve consists of about 10,000 acres, all within a 9' high fence. In the late sixties it was the site of the first muzzle loader and trophy only deer hunts in the state. The deer were not fed, and the only real exposure to humans was during the hunting seasons. In 1972 in a experiment to see if all the deer within the enclosure could be killed by hunters, they held a special season. I and my dad participated and killed two does. One was 7 1/2 and the other aged @ 9 1/2. Hunters were allowed in by special permit and in limited numbers. In less than a month not a deer was left. This was using firearms and methods of 42 years ago. This was an area of dense cover and deep swamps with few if any roads and access other than the perimeter. The DNR was surprised by how easily and how quickly the deer were eliminated, just because the fence did not allow them to escape. Thus, even ten thousand acres while a big one, was still just a pen. But then, I enjoyed my participation in the hunt and our family had two bonus antlerless deer in the freezer, which at the time was rare in Wisconsin. I also at no time other than when entering the preserve and leaving our vehicle ever saw the fence. The area is located within a larger area of public land that has no restrictions on hunter numbers and is not fenced in. Still deer numbers there, even with the three month long archery season and three week long firearm seasons, has never came close to having all the deer eliminated. The difference? The pen.
Again, I have no problem with the fence and the hunting opportunities it presents. You know as well as I do that those areas with hundreds of thousands of acres behind fence, in America, is not the norm, but the exception. The norm is a reasonable amount of area managed to make the most profit per acre, like any other ag crop. It also is designed for high hunter success in order to get the desired trophy fees and tips for the guides and meat handlers, along with getting the client to return. It is what it is.