the 19X have a different profile to the extractor.
You will also find the 19x has a different ejector than the others..
the 19X have a different profile to the extractor.
Then they'd have to answer questions about "enhanced ejection over what?" "Are you saying there was an ejection issue with your late Gen 3 and Gen 4 guns?"IMO Glock could have highlighted as a "feature" "enhanced ejection" ...
Then they'd have to answer questions about "enhanced ejection over what?" "Are you saying there was an ejection issue with your late Gen 3 and Gen 4 guns?"
Yeah I thought about that as I was typing it, but they are masters at marketing so it'd been funny to see how they would've chosen to highlight it. Kinda like the removal of finger grooves. "We know these made the gun better when we added them, but it's even more better now that they're gone!"Then they'd have to answer questions about "enhanced ejection over what?" "Are you saying there was an ejection issue with your late Gen 3 and Gen 4 guns?"
Leaving it as "internet rumor" is typically the way they've done business.
Some folks probably think the reason for the Gen 4 guns was to get those back straps. The reason for the Gen 4 guns was to fix the problems with the Gen 3 .40 S&W models. All the other stuff were just throw-in's since they were changing the frame anyway.
We know these made the gun better when we added them, but it's even more better now that they're gone!"
I think you're right about this but I'd phrase it a little differently. I believe the pistol requires a certain minimum amount of resistance to its recoil impulse in order for it to function properly.As of the other day, Ive put 600 rounds through it, and not one piece of brass to the face! Im suspecting there was nothing wrong with it when it went back.
This is one reason I suspect its how people are, or may be holding the guns when they shoot. It shoots fine for me. Why wouldnt it shoot fine for them?
Fixed it for you!