GLOCK vs. Sig Sauer
- Thread starter Greg8098
- Start date
- Status
Get a Sig
I personally prefer consistent triggers, lighter & smaller packages with paradoxically higher capacities, shorter slides with paradoxically longer sight radii and barrels (& w/polygonal > conventional rifling), poly > aluminum, more durable, and less expensive in initial cost, parts and mags; less parts/simple design, less intensive maintenance schedule etc; but then again, I'm of the "lowest common denominator" in handgunners, so ymmv...
Because Sigs really look nice, when new at least (GLOCK is just as ugly used or new). SIgs have nicer sights. And apparently the pins and controls in their frames don't rust anymore. And Sig just has this essence of all around superiority that no one can put a finger on specifically, because it's more a general sense of awesomeness.
Also, remember that because GLOCK is the most common choice of poorly trained cops and first time gun owners, and is most simple in operation and upkeep- that if you buy GLOCK, you are part of the "lowest common denominator" of all handgun users in terms of skill, training, and taste (your palate is not refined enough to appreciate a higher level of sophistication). Either that, or you just bought one because you saw it in a movie. Or because you couldn't afford a Sig. Do you really want to be part of all that? Didn't THINK so! Get a Sig.
I personally prefer consistent triggers, lighter & smaller packages with paradoxically higher capacities, shorter slides with paradoxically longer sight radii and barrels (& w/polygonal > conventional rifling), poly > aluminum, more durable, and less expensive in initial cost, parts and mags; less parts/simple design, less intensive maintenance schedule etc; but then again, I'm of the "lowest common denominator" in handgunners, so ymmv...
Because Sigs really look nice, when new at least (GLOCK is just as ugly used or new). SIgs have nicer sights. And apparently the pins and controls in their frames don't rust anymore. And Sig just has this essence of all around superiority that no one can put a finger on specifically, because it's more a general sense of awesomeness.
Also, remember that because GLOCK is the most common choice of poorly trained cops and first time gun owners, and is most simple in operation and upkeep- that if you buy GLOCK, you are part of the "lowest common denominator" of all handgun users in terms of skill, training, and taste (your palate is not refined enough to appreciate a higher level of sophistication). Either that, or you just bought one because you saw it in a movie. Or because you couldn't afford a Sig. Do you really want to be part of all that? Didn't THINK so! Get a Sig.
PhillyGlocker
Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 235
As you can tell by my user name, I'm a Glock fan. I still can't believe the negative reviews they get. I have fired lots of pistols including Sigs. They are excellent pistols as well, but I don't see how they are better than any Glock I've fired. I favor Glocks because of the weight and durability. For self defense I would definitely go with the Glock. If you want to look like a Homeland Security Employee, Get a SIG.
You may finish debating now.
You may finish debating now.
Slvr Surfr
Member
jlh26oo,
Your post was by far the most condescending post I have ever seen on THR to date.
QUOTE:
"GLOCK is the most common choice of poorly trained cops and first time gun owners, and is most simple in operation and upkeep- that if you buy GLOCK, you are part of the "lowest common denominator" of all handgun users in terms of skill, training, and taste (your palate is not refined enough to appreciate a higher level of sophistication)."
Its obvious that you have never worked in the Law Enforcement field.
70% of the U.S. LE world uses glocks because they in fact WORK. Yes they are simple, and yes they are easy to up keep. I would call that perfect in a world that so badly needs things to work EVERY time when LIVES depends on it. Hence: "GLOCK PERFECTION". Sigs are great guns. I personally have never cared for them. I’ve owned two and felt like they never shot well. Yet I can pick up a glock and call my shots all day. Speaking of non LE world. Have you bothered to look at anyone in your local shooting competitions? Take a guess what a majority of those "poorly trained souls" use. You guessed it. GLOCK. Your generalization of glock guns and owners is ridiculous and plain ignorant. I hope you don’t try to tell me a Rolex is better at keeping time than a Timex just because its more expensive and looks fancier. Just incase don't bother I own both, and know better.
Your post was by far the most condescending post I have ever seen on THR to date.
QUOTE:
"GLOCK is the most common choice of poorly trained cops and first time gun owners, and is most simple in operation and upkeep- that if you buy GLOCK, you are part of the "lowest common denominator" of all handgun users in terms of skill, training, and taste (your palate is not refined enough to appreciate a higher level of sophistication)."
Its obvious that you have never worked in the Law Enforcement field.
70% of the U.S. LE world uses glocks because they in fact WORK. Yes they are simple, and yes they are easy to up keep. I would call that perfect in a world that so badly needs things to work EVERY time when LIVES depends on it. Hence: "GLOCK PERFECTION". Sigs are great guns. I personally have never cared for them. I’ve owned two and felt like they never shot well. Yet I can pick up a glock and call my shots all day. Speaking of non LE world. Have you bothered to look at anyone in your local shooting competitions? Take a guess what a majority of those "poorly trained souls" use. You guessed it. GLOCK. Your generalization of glock guns and owners is ridiculous and plain ignorant. I hope you don’t try to tell me a Rolex is better at keeping time than a Timex just because its more expensive and looks fancier. Just incase don't bother I own both, and know better.
Preferences
I have been looking at Glocks since they first came out. They simply do not fit me properly. In a small pistol I looked at the Glock and the Kahr. I chose the Kahr. In a full sized / high cap pistol I looked at sig beretta glock hk and smith and wesson. I bought a Sig 226. As far as accuracy goes I think it is very good as does my wife.
I have been looking at Glocks since they first came out. They simply do not fit me properly. In a small pistol I looked at the Glock and the Kahr. I chose the Kahr. In a full sized / high cap pistol I looked at sig beretta glock hk and smith and wesson. I bought a Sig 226. As far as accuracy goes I think it is very good as does my wife.
Rob96
Member
Please do share with us your background that entitles you to post such ill-thought out crap.
They both have their advantages and disadvantages. I've owned both, never had a problem with either.
Sig Pro's=what can I say, it's a damn good gun. It's built well and extremely accurate. The out of the box accuracy and smoothness is almost unparalleled. Plus, there's something about the sound you hear when you rack a Sig slide that you don't get with other guns. Will pretty much eat up and spit out any ammo you feed it.
Sig Con's=price. They're not inexpensive guns. Depending on your body type, you might have a problem balancing size and capacity. Mags are expensive, $30 for new mags.
Glock Pro's=easy to use, no frills. Plenty of aftermarket support such as sights, barrels, control levers, triggers, etc... They're inexpensive. You can get used Glocks for a $400. They're easy to maintain and easy to work on. Like the Glock, it will eat up any ammo you feed it. High capacity in relation to size. C'mon, who wouldn't want 15+1 in a G19? It's a pretty small gun. Mags are $20 a piece.
Glock Con's=some people don't like the way they look but that's subjective. Some people don't like the grip angle.
I heard one idiot, and I do use that term literally, say that, "Glocks are garbage." But that was coming from an idiot who has never even owned a pistol in his lifetime.
Of course, you hear about the lack of "safeties" on a Glock. But if you're trained well, you know that your safety shouldn't be a mechanical lever, it should be your brain, which controls your trigger finger.
Sig Pro's=what can I say, it's a damn good gun. It's built well and extremely accurate. The out of the box accuracy and smoothness is almost unparalleled. Plus, there's something about the sound you hear when you rack a Sig slide that you don't get with other guns.
Will pretty much eat up and spit out any ammo you feed it.Sig Con's=price. They're not inexpensive guns. Depending on your body type, you might have a problem balancing size and capacity. Mags are expensive, $30 for new mags.
Glock Pro's=easy to use, no frills. Plenty of aftermarket support such as sights, barrels, control levers, triggers, etc... They're inexpensive. You can get used Glocks for a $400. They're easy to maintain and easy to work on. Like the Glock, it will eat up any ammo you feed it. High capacity in relation to size. C'mon, who wouldn't want 15+1 in a G19? It's a pretty small gun. Mags are $20 a piece.
Glock Con's=some people don't like the way they look but that's subjective. Some people don't like the grip angle.
I heard one idiot, and I do use that term literally, say that, "Glocks are garbage." But that was coming from an idiot who has never even owned a pistol in his lifetime.
Of course, you hear about the lack of "safeties" on a Glock. But if you're trained well, you know that your safety shouldn't be a mechanical lever, it should be your brain, which controls your trigger finger.
FPrice
Member
Pretty don't win gunfights.
-terry
Member
jlh26oo,
I thought you were being funny. I was quite amused, not offended. Only the pot can call another pot black, right?
-terry
I thought you were being funny. I was quite amused, not offended. Only the pot can call another pot black, right?
-terry
Slvr Surfr
Member
Its true that some officers are not entitled to their choice of weapons. It is left up to the department. I was more concerned about the way a department goes about choosing a gun manufacturer. The 70% of the market chooses Glocks because of their simplicity, and excellent quality. In my opinion Glock offer departments an exceptional product for a hard to beat price. The gun is not extremely expensive, parts are easy to get, and training armorers is easy. Glocks have their cons as do all gun manufacturers.
My post to jlh26oo was caused by what I thought was a extremely bad generalization. If he was just joking than I apologize. It was the end of a long shift, and the cord of the post just struck me wrong. Normally Id agree that arguing on the internet is futile.
I really enjoy this forum becuase its not the typical gun forum !
My post to jlh26oo was caused by what I thought was a extremely bad generalization. If he was just joking than I apologize. It was the end of a long shift, and the cord of the post just struck me wrong. Normally Id agree that arguing on the internet is futile.
I really enjoy this forum becuase its not the typical gun forum !
atblis
Member
Ha
Did you guys actually read jlh26oo's message?
:banghead:
I more or less agree with him. What's so special about SIG?
Did you guys actually read jlh26oo's message?
:banghead:
I more or less agree with him. What's so special about SIG?
Texshooter
Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 481
Well, the burb I live in outside ATL uses the G22 because they got them for free (with trade of old wheelies.)
My neighbor was on the selection board and the politicos told them they would select the free pistol.
It was not what they wanted, but the did become part of the "why do you think 70% of LEOs carry Glock" crowd.
My neighbor was on the selection board and the politicos told them they would select the free pistol.
It was not what they wanted, but the did become part of the "why do you think 70% of LEOs carry Glock" crowd.
i really dont understand why anyone would compare a glock to a sig, that's like comparing a cady to a chevy. Nothing wrong with a chevy i like em but i would take a nice cady over a chevy any day. SEcriously people are over hiping glocks just a bit.
Rob96
Member
My bad. I was not fully awake.
- Status