Again...you must have missed it. It's again in bold type right above the 2nd set of results.......Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?. By definition, that's what a universal background check is.
One of the other things you may missed are the results from the first question.....Do you support or oppose stricter gun control laws in the United States? The results show that a decreasing amount of folks support this and those opposed are in the majority in the most recent polling. If the University that did the polling manipulated the results about UBCs, why did they not manipulate this also? This poll has been verified and considered legitimate by a number of organizations, many which are considered quite conservative. No, there is no smoke and mirrors. Whether the choices are made intelligently or emotionally, informed or naive, it shows, like it or not, accept it or not, that a majority of folks that are pro-gun, are also pro UBC. There are other legitimate polls out there that show that even a majority of NRA members current or recent, support the use of UBCs. Up till a few years ago, the NRA itself supported background checks. Ask Wayne LaPierre. None of these are lies or "Smoke and Mirrors". Just a accurate appraisal of American opinion.
Again, I don't like the idea of UBCs, nor do I think expanding them to FTF sales will do one lick of good to decrease crime and gun violence. I just admit that a majority of folks in the U.S. do. I have seen the proof. Denying it is not going to change it. Just calling 90% of the American voting public "idiots and liars" is not going to change it either. Like those that support UBCs, we need to show facts and give legitimate reasoning against them. Educating the voters, while not as easy as posturing and calling names like a third grader on the playground, is what may change their mind.