Yosemite Sam
Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2008
- Messages
- 311
Kansas City, MO
I took this on my lunch break recently, since I pay attention to "posted" notices. I saw the 30.06 notice and coulda swore they were citing TEXAS LAW in Missouri, since as a Missouri CCW holder and instructor, I know that the law is written in RSMo Ch. 571 and doesn't have the language below:
Note: The white boxes are just my reflection.
Notice the huge spelling error: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (Trespass by Holder of Licensce to Carry..."
I gather from this one of several possibilities:
1) H&R Block's Corporate lawyers are buffoons.
2) They are trying to scare the ignorant masses who do not know better.
3) They may be truly anti-gun and have an agenda. Meaning I will have to change who I do my taxes with.
4) Their lawyers did this intentionally to deceive people.
I took this on my lunch break recently, since I pay attention to "posted" notices. I saw the 30.06 notice and coulda swore they were citing TEXAS LAW in Missouri, since as a Missouri CCW holder and instructor, I know that the law is written in RSMo Ch. 571 and doesn't have the language below:
Note: The white boxes are just my reflection.
Notice the huge spelling error: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (Trespass by Holder of Licensce to Carry..."
I gather from this one of several possibilities:
1) H&R Block's Corporate lawyers are buffoons.
2) They are trying to scare the ignorant masses who do not know better.
3) They may be truly anti-gun and have an agenda. Meaning I will have to change who I do my taxes with.
4) Their lawyers did this intentionally to deceive people.