I didn't read all the responses, but you guys ought to keep in mind if you load up your shotgun with slugs or 000 buckshot and a guy does break in, you blast him away and paralyze the guy or kill him, he or his family might sue saying your intent was murder because of your choice of ammo. If you use birdshot, something that's less likely to kill, a judge might just throw the case out.
Whether or not the BG is terminally wounded or not, his family will
attempt to sue you. That is a given of self defense in our modern age. Unfortunately, it goes with the territory. You know, "I'd rather be judged by 12 rather than be carried by 6" and all that.
I disagree with your premise that your more likely to get a favorable outcome from a judge if you use bird shot. The fact of the matter is you will likely lose a lawsuit where you were intending to wound rather than
kill (read: STOP) an attacker. And, you will lose big.
You wound and paralyze a BG with bird shot and his lawyer has you over a barrel. You were using ammunition with the INTENT of wounding (thus paralyzing) his client. YOUR intent is directly responsible for his client sitting in a wheelchair for the rest of his natural life. YOU should be made to pay for all his medical treatments, pain and suffering and livelihood that was lost as a direct result of your actions.
Also, proof of your
intent is permanently recorded on this forum. It will be researched by the BG's legal team and that fact will come back to bite you on the ass in court. So, there is no using the excuse you used bird shot that happened to be left over in the gun from your last upland outing. If you posted it here, expect to see it again when it's used against you in court.
You are shooting to STOP an attacker. His unfortunate demise is the direct result of his unlawful life threatening actions on you and/or your loved ones. His loved ones pain and suffering over their loss is the direct result of the BG's unlawful actions. In other words, he brought it upon himself.
After you shoot a BG, irregardless of whether you wound or kill him, your only real hope is that it will be judged as a righteous shoot and you will be legally rendered an unworthy target from money grubbing relatives of the lowlife who met his end in a justifiable shoot. If they sue, they will lose big time. Living in a Castle Doctrine state can only help you in this regard.
'nuff said...
Please keep in mind that this is 100% my opinion, which was derived and formulated from information sources I've encountered, whether they are correct or not. I am not a lawyer, never was and never will be. So, my opinion is worth the price paid and no more.
I implore everyone to seek legal counsel on self defense issues within the borders of their state.
Don't go on the word of some guy on an internet gun forum for your legal advice. He may very well be a village idiot disguised as an intelligent person.