I think it would help alot of these antis to visit a gun range, take a safety class, etc. Whatever it takes to get them to shoot a few rounds and realize guns aren't going to fire without pulling the trigger(for the most part) or go rob a liquor store themselves. From my experiences most of these fears are from seeing guns on tv and automatically drinking the hater koolaide without any first hand, real world experience.
These are some of the simple antis, raised to be an anti.
Many of the hardcore and most active antis, who promote legislation and raise money to fund anti-gun efforts already are protected by firearms.
They either have them for protection, or have armed bodyguards.
Dianne Feinstein for example was one of the few people carrying a concealed firearm in all of San Francisco. Yet she has done more in creating anti gun legislation at the state and national level (like the AWB) than most people.
The most powerful antis do want guns on their side, they just don't want the average people with access to them.
Really it is no different than royalty a thousand years ago. Who wanted to be armed, and have better arms and better bodyguards than any of their people.
This predates guns:
For example crossbows were banned many places because they allowed a simple peasant with limited or no training to defeat an armed knight who had been trained since he was a boy in all manner of fighting.
No peasant who had to toiled day in and day out could ever match a knight who was free to train, and had to train most of their lives.
While a bow took skill to master and was perceived as less of a threat, the crossbow created equality.
It was also one of the earlier "armor piercing" projectile bans. The king's men could crush peasants easily, and were armored against attacks. But a heavy crossbow could punch through their armor and just required cocking, pointing, and shooting.
Similar things have been repeated throughout history, by many governments and ruling parties, as well as various aristocrats. They do not want equality. They want to feel secure that they have more power than any of the rabble.
The most powerful antis behind legislation and funding often are not disarmed, and some are quite good with guns or hire people who are.