Kahr PM9 or Kel-Tec P3AT

Status
Not open for further replies.

texcalibur

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
13
Of these two models, what are your opinions of the best for pocket carry. I realize some of the discussion would involve caliber discussion of 9mm v. .380.
 
Wouldn't trust a Kel-Tec....

Then again, I wouldn't trust any plastic framed gun.

I'll take an MK9 loaded with Winchester 124gr NATO or 127gr +P+ Rangers.

The MK9 is lighter than my current pocket gun....
 
Man this is a tough call....I have both a PM9 (accually 2 PM9's ) and a P3AT.

The Kahr PM9 is the ultimit pocketgun loadded with 7 rounds of corbon 100g powRball UNTILL you put a P3AT in your pocket. :what:

I don't care much for the little 32acp's in any flavor for the sole reason the round give's me ZERO comfort. I will admit I would not want to be shot with one but I don't like it as a defensive round.

That said..I like the 380acp in the P3AT package. I use winchester 90g sxt's, acurate, nice punch and make a bigger hole than any 22,25 or 32 in a similar pized package. Hopefully by the end of 2003 corbon will have a 380 powRball.

To answer your question my carry PM9 has Novak nitesites and I was carrying a 8rd T-9 magazine for spare.
This was a perfect pocket setup for me...as good as it gets I thought... But since I got the P3AT in the first part of june the PM9 has been left in my safe for bedtime duty and the P3AT has not left my pocket.

The Damm thing is just so small,so thin, so light, it works and it has 380acp punch...... :scrutiny:

Thats what I tell myself anyway...The PM9 is a superior defensive piece IMOP because of round it fires, and the sighting system but for the role of a pocket piece they both are comforting BUT the P3AT is more comfortable hands down...
 
Concerned Citizen, what is the T-9 8 round magazine? It is not flush is it because even the 7 rounder has that butt ugly butt plate!
 
I have not shot the P3AT further than 20ft, I generally practice at about 15ft and at this distance my P3AT shots equal with my PM, when shooting rapid fire my groups are generally 3-4''.

Shooting slow and delibrit I can tighten them up to around 2 or 3'' and closer to 1-2'' with the PM9.

Last time at the range I did more plinkling than anything with the P3AT and was poping empty shotgun shell's off a post from 12-15ft fairly regulary..:D

The elite trigger is superior to the keltecs also, but the keltec is a much smaller gun and the triggers good IMOP, its a shorter pull than the kahr but not as smooth. Trigger weight between the two is about the same around 7lbs.
 
I have had problems with 3 KTs out of the box,but not one with the Kahr pm9 out of the box.This might only be my bad luck with KTs .The Kahr I would depend upon though loaded a pound in weight verses the 8-9oz of the KT 3.80.
 
texcalibur...The spare mags I'm using are from the T-series kahrs, there kahrs largest gun so far.

The mags have a 8 shot capacity, They do stick out about 3'' from the bottom of the butt, I would not carry the PM with one inserted, they do not have the gap filler finger rest like the 7 shot mk/pm mags I only use them for range/home and carry spare.
 
I just acquired a P 3AT.

Love it.

No bigger than P32. It easily fits the same pocket holster.

200 rounds fired so far, most at about 25 feet, groups are around 2 or 3 inches, but can be less if I "stage" the trigger.

No malfunctions at all.

I was shooting about half hardball, and about half Winchester Silvertips.
 
I pocket carry a snub .38 and a .380. (.380 is just a tad smaller than a Kel Tec P-11.) If a Kahr PM9 wouldn't bulge pocket any more than those two, then I would choose it. I feel 9mm is much better for self defense than a .380.
 
If concealability is your #1 concern, the P-3AT is much thinner, and lighter, and will totally disappear in your pocket. The Kahr PM9 will easily fit in most pockets too. If caliber is more important to you than weight/size, the PM9 is the way to go. The Kahr seems more substantial and ruggedly built to me. My PM9 has been very accurate and reliable. I have nothing against Kel-Tecs, and I know many work fine, but every Kel-Tec I've owned has given me problems, and I wouldn't trust mine for carry.

See if you can find a PM9 to try out in your pocket. If it won't work, the P-3AT will.
 
"I didn't think he had a gun so I came at him with my knife, he just had his hands in his jeans pockets see, and that little black gun came from nowhere like lightning and he shot me".

I'm guessing these will be the last words of a lot of muggers in shall issue states, it will be their first and last meeting with the P-3AT.

A lot of people don't carry because effective concealment and comfortable all day carry are mutually exclusive, no matter what die hards say.

The P-3AT IMO is a real ground breaker, because for the first time, a truly easy to carry pistol is available in an effective caliber.

We should be grateful for this pistol if only because more people will be encouraged to carry because of its existence.

I know they aren't .454 Casulls but you can do a lot worse than 7 rounds of .380ACP Hydrashoks.
 
Definitely the Kahr (Tho I prefer all stainless myself) There's no comparison between the two.
KT's are good inexpensive little guns, I own two P32's and P11, I shoot them regularly and enjoy them as hobby guns but Kahrs they aint !
I was a died in the wool KT believer until I bought a Kahr K40 which is now my daily carry piece. No comparison. Sorry KTOGers
 
Thanks for the informative replies! I was able to shoot a Kahr PM9 and handle (but not shoot) a Kel-Tec P3T this weekend. My impressions were that the Kahr is well made, durable, reliable and accurate at defensive distances (21 feet). But, it was a little big for me for a pocket gun. It is much better than a Glock 26, but is still (at about 16 oz. loaded) heavy and a little big for my pockets on a daily (although fine for occasional pocket use) basis.
 
Quote,

"I didn't think he had a gun so I came at him with my knife, he just had his hands in his jeans pockets see, and that little black gun came from nowhere like lightning and he shot me".

I'm guessing these will be the last words of a lot of muggers in shall issue states, it will be their first and last meeting with the P-3AT.

A lot of people don't carry because effective concealment and comfortable all day carry are mutually exclusive, no matter what die hards say.

The P-3AT IMO is a real ground breaker, because for the first time, a truly easy to carry pistol is available in an effective caliber.

We should be grateful for this pistol if only because more people will be encouraged to carry because of its existence.

I know they aren't .454 Casulls but you can do a lot worse than 7 rounds of .380ACP Hydrashoks."


The NAA 380 was the first of it's kind.

No one can count on a 380 or any handgun for that matter, stopping an attakcer and it's best to carry the best stopper you can. You'd be surprized at how quick and dangerous an attacker with a knife can be, even when shot multiple times.

To say you can't carry anything larger is just being lazy IMO. Bren
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top