DeFreitas v. State, 701 So.2d 593 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1997). The prosecutor had asked the jury to "imagine how terrifying this laser [from the gun] would be if it was on your chest." This was a case where the defendant was accused of pointing a gun at some people, i.e. aggravated assault with a firearm. It is not clear to me whether the laser was influential in the conviction and sentence to 3 years. At appeal, the remark about the laser was deemed impermissible and improper conduct on the part of the prosecutor. For this and other reasons, the conviction was overturned.
So it seems a prosecutor would likely try to make the offense seem worse by bringing up the laser but would not necessarily get away with it.
So it wasn't an argument of excessive force and has only been made in a case about brandishing/assault without discharge. Sounds easier to defeat than the "super deadly hollowpoint" argument. I'm comfortable with that. Pretty interesting, all the same.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.