Lawsuit launched against Front Sight by members

Status
Not open for further replies.
exoduster18 said:
Ok, I just read through this entire post and I am confused. I know the whole Front Sight situation and the litigation. But *** is Xenu and what does Scientology have to do with it? Also it would be greatly appreciated if anybody could add any related info about Scientology. Because I don't have a clue.......
Dr. Naish Piazza, founder of Front Sight, has not (to my knowledge) come out and said, "yeah, I'm a Scientologist", but he has said that he has achieved some high level of Scientology training, like OT something-or-other, which you don't get to without a major commitment of time, money and personal commitment. Also, FS' sales pitch involves some terms like "exchange in abundance", and some other Scientology-sounding phrases. Scientology has its own business curriculum and FS seems to have taken some pages from that curriculum. For example, Scientology itself puts a big emphasis on celebrity recruitment. FS does the same. Scientology staff wear snappy uniforms. FS does the same. Etc.

Xenu (if you don't know) is some Scientology supernatural being or something. You can read all about Xenu here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu. It's pretty Sci Fi if you ask me. It hard to imagine that anyone takes such stories seriously (read the entire Wiki article) but in fact Scientologists have to pay many thousands of dollars to learn about such things.

Some other poster refered to a "clambake". This was a joke about this site: http://www.xenu.net/.

But FS is its own thing, not part of Scientology and there are absolutely no references or allusions to Scientology at FS itself or in any of their materials. So it's owned by someone with connections to Scientology, but the business itself is not a Scientology-connected business, as far as I can tell. I also have a feeling that most of the instructors are not connected to Scientology.
 
I'm reading all that info on Wikipedia right now.

WOW!!! This is so damn crazy. This has all of the makings for a bad hollywierd movie.

I'm sitting here stunned by the way all of this sounds. I'm blown away by the sheer stupidity that this sounds like to me. I'm not trying to bash anyone's religion or anything like that, but WOW!!, this sounds a little to far fetched for me. And I have a pretty open mind when it comes to stuff like this.

I don't really know what to say or how to describe what I feel and think about all of this. WOW!!!!
 
exoduster18 said:
I'm reading all that info on Wikipedia right now.

WOW!!! This is so damn crazy. This has all of the makings for a bad hollywierd movie.

I'm sitting here stunned by the way all of this sounds. I'm blown away by the sheer stupidity that this sounds like to me. I'm not trying to bash anyone's religion or anything like that, but WOW!!, this sounds a little to far fetched for me. And I have a pretty open mind when it comes to stuff like this.

I don't really know what to say or how to describe what I feel and think about all of this. WOW!!!!
Yeah, basically that's right. L. Ron was a bad sci-fi writer and the Xenu story (the most important "event" in the S. history of the world) would be laughably bad sci-fi writing if it weren't the center of a minor but well-funded religion.

Bible miracles aren't as ridiculous because they aren't as detail-specific. Ok, water into wine, that's cool, that's a "credible miracle" perhaps. But Xenu... DC-9s in space... hydrogen bombs, volcanoes, people 75mil years ago looking, dressing, acting EXACTLY as they did in the 50s. Wow.

He should have just left out ALL THE DETAILS and reduced it: "Early humans were almost wiped out by an evil force called Xenu. He used his knowledge to burn the Earth. He used his power to confuse these disembodied souls and they all gathered into the bodies of the few remaining humans. These confused souls are with us today." If he had just said it THAT WAY it would somehow be a credible religious-mythological story. But no, he had to include details about DC-9s and 50s-style clothes and cars and hydrogen bombs.

According to the Xenu story, this is literally what it looked like when Xenu loaded a 100bil (or whatever) humans onto planes and sent them through space to Earth:

250px-Xenu_space_plane.jpg


Note the Sea Org logo on the tail. A lotta drugs goin around in those days I guess.
 
ElTacoGrande said:
Yeah, basically that's right. L. Ron was a bad sci-fi writer and the Xenu story (the most important "event" in the S. history of the world) would be laughably bad sci-fi writing if it weren't the center of a minor but well-funded religion.

Scientology was started on a bar bet. Heinlein commented that the best way to get rich was a religion (which was a minor but relevant theme in Stranger in a Strange Land). Hubbard bet he could start a religion based on a bad SF story and make it work. Heinlein wasn't quite that cynical. Then.

The rest is history.

On the other hand, Scientology DID destroy C.A.N. They deserve credit for that, and we should copy the method for dealing with Brady.
 
I know fluffy-bunny Wiccans, Christian Faight healers, Satanists, and other kooks who read about Scientology and just shake their heads. Imagine Sarah Brady saying that a gun control bill goes too far, and you'll get the same effect. That said...

This isn't about Scientology, or at least shouldn't be...
 
Moderator Note

Hey everyone, let's keep to the topic of this thread -- which is the lawsuit against Front Sight & its fallout.

We aren't going to make fun of anyone's religion here on THR. Check the Forum Rules for more details.

pax
 
Ah yes, another thread on FS.

For my association with the school, and general thoughts, I've said it all on the other FS thread referenced earlier by someone else...

Chuck Burnett-
Good guy, I've worked with him before...and talk about "taking one for the team" he was crazy enough to volunteer to be pepper sprayed and then demonstrate that someone pepper sprayed can still "stay in the fight" on video (including pummeling a guy wearing the padded suit, then running through a tac simulater with simunition and even unloading and clearing the weapon first before finally running over to that water hose for some relief! :D

Lawsuit and comments so far-
Has N. Piazza been perfect in all his business decisions so far? doubtful, but who is. He is trying to do a big thing with FrontSight and that has taken money, and more time than everyone had hoped...oh well. Heck, look how many startups blow through all their VC money and end up with nothing. As for some of the FS attacks and comments, sheesh, c'mon guys. At least Piazza is constantly trying to do pro 2nd amendment things from different angles. We'll never regain lost ground if the pro-gun people can't even stand together. (and i don't mean stand together as in support or not support front sight in this lawsuit, the courts will sort it out, but in general)
 
From everything I've read on this thread so far it appears to me that the lawsuit is just sour grapes from some folks that got conned (legally it seems) and now want the nanny state to step in and say bad FS, bad!

If this Piazza guy really did sell memberships and not actual property then tough noogies for the folks that bought them. I mean, come on! If I were laying down $200K for something I'd darn sure understand exactly what I was getting for it.

Maybe Piazza misled folks but so far I am not aware of the law stepping in and investigating anything (are they?). Con games are after all illegal. Slick marketing isn't.

And it seems no one is saying that the training one gets at FS isn't top notch. Based on the reviews here and elsewhere I wouldn't hesitate to train there except for one thing - course cost is way too high IMO. But if one has the money and considers the cost reasonable go for it.

Buyer beware as the saying goes and remember:

DARWIN ALWAYS WINS!
 
Cosmoline said:
These people spent $200,000 and didn't even get a deed! It's horrific. They got a right to get a deed if the property is ever actually developed.

If they spent that kind of money I think they could argue they have a completed land sales contract and he must give them legal title. They would also have equitable rights to use the land. But of course the beauty part is the land is useless desert so Ignatius isn't out a dime. If the heat comes down he can just slip off to Belize.

Sadly, having lots of money doesn't make you less gullible or smarter. In many cases, it just means you lose a larger amount of money for stupid things.

That "kind" of money doesn't entitle a person to to a legal title anymore or any less than any other amount of money.

Front Sight is often compared to a resort golf community, only golfers rarely buy in this manner.

I don't know how you can say that the land is useless desert. Apparently some is good for a gun range and the rest has raised millions of dollars.

As for the folks saying they have received great training at Front Sight and will be returning for more, I hate to say it, but those sorts of endorsements are about as valuable as one of Front Sight's package deals. Either virtually every gun class ever offered by any instructor or school has been outstanding as reported by folks on gun forums, or people are not likely to report that they attended a crappy school or class and spent big $ getting poor education. Then, when the folks do report having had bad classes, other forum members want to argue the validity of the claims and suggest things like the person posting a negative review has some specific agenda.

In case anyone is interested, I have an honest proposition for you. I will sell you Double Naught Super Extraordinary Full Access to my range for just $40,000 with a 10% discount to THR members and 10% going to the NRA. What do you get for that price? You get to come shoot. Don't worry, I won't bother you with trying to sell you worthless parcels of land or get you to invest in my religion. In fact, if all goes well, you won't see me again after I get your money. Oh, and at this level, you don't have to pick up your own brass. I will accept payment in American cash, gold or silver bullion, or via Paypal. PM me for payment details. Shooting is dawn to dusk. There is no range manager, no running water, no restrooms, and no air conditioning. It is simply a primitive range with steel targets. And that is the total of my offerings as you will NOT get an option to buy land, build houses, or anything else.
 
Werewolf said:
And it seems no one is saying that the training one gets at FS isn't top notch. Based on the reviews here and elsewhere I wouldn't hesitate to train there except for one thing - course cost is way too high IMO. But if one has the money and considers the cost reasonable go for it.

Front Sight's latest membership offer is $1200 for a variety of classes (handgun, shotgun, rifle, etc) you can take the rest of your life (or theirs). Assuming the classes included are of interest, it doesn't take long to recover your costs given the quality of the training. I think it is hard to argue with the value.

In the past, equivalent memberships have been significantly more and out of reach for many people. I don't consider $ 1200 in that category.

Of course, if you want to take additional/more advanced courses or upgrade your membership, the cost will increase. But at that point, you know what the situation is and can evaluate it for yourself.
 
Guy gets sucked into FS by the "we'll let you shoot machine guns free" b.s. Guy has never had any real training before. Guy takes training at FS. Guy posts glowing reviews on internet about grand training he got at FS. End of story.
 
Rockstar said:
Guy gets sucked into FS by the "we'll let you shoot machine guns free" b.s. Guy has never had any real training before. Guy takes training at FS. Guy posts glowing reviews on internet about grand training he got at FS. End of story.

Rockstar. I am curious, what do you consider "real training"?
 
I too would enjoy hearing about all the real training you have had.
If you can remember the final skills tests I would also enjoy hearing about what they consisted of at your real training.

I would really enjoy hearing a review by anyone who has honestly taken a class at Frontsight AS WELL AS the same type of class at any other well known, sleep away firearms school anywhere in the world. Please give us your comparison. If you haven't done BOTH, don't waste bandwith.

* I have done both.
 
444 said:
I too would enjoy hearing about all the real training you have had.
If you can remember the final skills tests I would also enjoy hearing about what they consisted of at your real training.

I would really enjoy hearing a review by anyone who has honestly taken a class at Frontsight AS WELL AS the same type of class at any other well known, sleep away firearms school anywhere in the world. Please give us your comparison. If you haven't done BOTH, don't waste bandwith.

* I have done both.

444, What schools and what were your observations?
 
AAshooter said:
Front Sight's latest membership offer is $1200 for a variety of classes (handgun, shotgun, rifle, etc) you can take the rest of your life (or theirs). Assuming the classes included are of interest, it doesn't take long to recover your costs given the quality of the training. I think it is hard to argue with the value.

A few things that I want to mention:

1) Even though the newspaper story mentions a $1200 lifetime membership that includes full-auto courses, I can't seem to find the offer on Front Sight's web page.

The only membership the page seems to offer is something called a "Lifetime Legacy First Family Membership", which includes, among other things, lifetime access to a bunch of two and four day firearms courses...but no full-auto ones. It's also got four additional course certificates that you can "sell, transfer or donate" - as well as an additional "LIFETIME LEGACY FIRST FAMILY MEMBERSHIP WITH ALL BENEFITS LISTED ABOVE THAT YOU CAN GIFT,TRANSFER, OR SELL TO ANYONE YOU WISH". His caps.

All for the low, low price of $4900....for a single payment. You can also pay by installments of $199*36 months or $99*90 months ("interest free", it says?!), increasing the final total by a mere 65% ($7164) and 82% ($8900) respectively if I've done the math right.

2) Even if the $1200 membership exists, I personally would be wary of it unless I was sure to take a bunch of those courses quickly, ie I was living nearby. I don't think it's a good value for me to buy a membership to a club that has a $6 million interest-only mortgage, seemingly no firm plans to develop their land, bad PR, and is facing a large class-action lawsuit. $1200 (not to mention $4900) would buy a lot of practice time and range ammo here, and I don't anticipate the local range going bankrupt any time soon.

If Front Sight goes belly-up, how much will those memberships really be worth?

- Cliff

(I make no statement or inference on the quality of the training they offer)
 
The $1200 membership does exist. It was offered in a recent mailing.
It does in fact include two full auto courses: One with Uzis and one with M16s. They provide the guns BUT, you have to buy the ammo from THEIR pro-shop.

If you research what it costs to take 4-5 classes at any of the nationally known firearms training schools, you will see that the classes cost right around $1200 each.* So, if you pay Frontsight $1200 for that membership and only manage to take one four day class and the school folds, you really haven't lost anything. Since Frontsight has been in business for years, I seriously doubt they are going anywhere. The facility is very impressive to me. They have put a lot of money into the facility. No, it isn't done, and it might not be everything you wish it was, but just the two lane paved road from the main road to the facility had to have cost millions (just a guess). I have one of their lower priced memberships (that also isn't mentioned on their website). I have already gotten my money out of it. One of the beautiful things about it is the fact that you can take the classes over and over for no additonal cost. I can take each one every year to keep my skills tuned up. I can take the Practical rifle class with an AR, then with an AK, then with my FAL, then with my HK, then with a scoped hunting rifle, then with my M1A...................... I can become proficient with every rifle I own. I can evaluate for myself how each one functions under some pressure and decide which one I like the best. I love the Gunsite carbine classes, but if I wanted to try them again, they would be right around $1200 for EACH one. I already took Practical Rifle with an AR and an Aimpoint. This time I am going to take the class with an AR and my TA31F ACOG. Next time I am going to take the whole class using only my back up iron sights. No other school that I know of offers this option without spending a young fortune. I have taken four classes at Gunsite (and I am going to take more). I bet I have spend close to 10 GRAND for the tuition, ammo, lodging, travel, and gear I bought to take those classes. What's $1200 ?

I have taken Gunsite 223, 556, 260, and 250.
I have also taken Frontsight four day handgun, four day shotgun, and four day practical rifle. I am taking a Practical Rifle 2 day skill builder this coming weekend (November 19-20)
FWIW, I have also shot a number of shooting sports (rifle and pistol) avidly to include IDPA and IPSC.
I am not going to go into great detail (I have posted about this many times before on this board) but I can honestly say that I feel that Frontsight's four day handgun class was the best shooting class I have ever taken. I was also the most impressed with the instructors of that class of any handgun shooters I have ever seen. I found the final skills test to be VERY tough. One big thing that makes their class different is that you shoot for two days ALL from concealment including the final skills test.

As I have posted in many of these Frontsight bashing threads: I have serious problems with several aspects of Frontsight. BUT, most of the stuff posted on these threads is pure BS from people who have never been there.

*Here is a link to the tuition page at Gunsite: http://www.gunsite.com/tuition.htm
Here is a link to the tuition at Thunder Ranch: http://www.thunderranchinc.com/Ocost.htm
 
"I have serious problems with several aspects of Frontsight."

A lot of folks feel the same way and we've been talking about it for 4 pages. In fact, it was the main thrust of the opening post in this thread...

"Initially scheduled to open in winter of 2001, Piazza now says the project is on hold, indefinitely."

What can I say? Don't take it personally.

John
 
:confused:

Not sure if you are talking to me or not. Can't see where I am taking any of this personally.
I do have a problem with people talking out the wrong end about subjects they know nothing about: no matter the subject.
If you do a search on this board, you will find countless posts about Front Sight making attacks on every aspect of it other than their firearms instruction, including frequent and blatant attacks on the man's religion. This particular subject (this lawsuit) has never come up before (that I have seen). The other numerous threads were personal attacks for other reasons. If you research these threads you will only find one (that I remember) person that ever actually took a class there who didn't think the class was terrific. The one guy I remember that had a problem with it had a problem because he didn't want to shoot from the Weaver stance and this school teaches the Weaver stance. That was his big complaint.
Put very simply, this is a shooting/firearms related board. But the firearms instruction has never been an issue. It was personal attacks on the owner of the school. I don' t care about the owner of the school. I don't care about their legal dealings, their religion or any other personal issue. If the owner of Gunsite, Frontsight, Thunder Ranch, .................... have some kind of personal issue, I don't care. I am going there for firearms instruction.

Something that I found interesting about Frontsight, that might be worthy of a little thought for others: The way Frontsight got off the ground was two fold. One was the free Uzi classes. For several years they gave totally free one day Uzi classes. From what I understand from several people who actually took this class, it was a real class. Not just letting them fire one magazine: it was a full day of instruction with subguns and it was totally free. How many people do you think did that, that wern't even gun owners prior to the class ? The other method was giving away these course certificates that are either sold for a discount, or given away. Between these two methods of attracting business, they attracted thousands of people who actually went there, and took a class. They were impressed enough to either buy a membership or tell their friends to go.
So many people were so impressed by their first class that when you attend a class there now, there are HUNDREDS of students almost every weekend. There are a whole lot of people who don't buy into the crap posted on this board because unlike most of the people here, they went there themselves and really liked what they saw. Not just a few dupes but thousands of people. If you think Piazza is such a bad guy, tell me what you did to further the cause of personal firearms ownership that attracts hundreds of people a weekend, at least some of which arn't even gun owners. How many new shooters learned good safe gun handling at Frontsight ? How many soldiers and law enforcement officers trained there alongside civilians (which IMO creates a postive bond between police/military/and private citizens) ? The last time I went there there were probably a dozen Marines getting ready for their second deployment to Iraq. The day after 9/11 Piazza was offering free training for pilots...............................
Not many people are doing anything even close for R2KBA and none of the others are being publically attacked on what is supposed to be a pro-gun forum. Does the guy have faults ? I am sure he does. Does the school have faults ? Yes, I know this from personal experience. Does this give us the right to make public attacks on the man or the school ? Not in my opinion. Hell, just one more example: I work as a professional firefighter in Las Vegas. Several years ago, Frontsight offered one FREE four day class to any local firefighter. We are talking about several thousand people that were offered the chance to go and learn good safe gun handling in a very postive environment and get a little taste of their rights: some of whom were not gun owners prior to this offer. If he converted five people over to voting for pro gun candidates, that is more than most of us will ever do for R2KBA. When I have taken classes at Gunsite, the class seemed to consist of a bunch of LEOs, a few active duty military, and a couple plain old civilians like me. At Frontsight, it is just the opposite, it attacts a totally different group of people. They have military and LEOs, but most of the people there are civilians. In the 4 day classes that I have taken, there have always been more than a few people that had no idea of anything having to do with firearms: they were complete novices. Some of them rented guns at Frontsight to take the class. Think about that. If he takes a couple people every weekend and takes them from complete novice to a safe and responsible gun owner and does that for year after year, is this a guy that we should tar and feather as American citizens concerned about our gun rights ?
By the way, FWIW, I have never see Piazza. He has never been at the school when I was there, or at least I didn't see him there.
 
Last edited:
"I don't care about their legal dealings"

Some people do care.

"is this a guy that we should tar and feather as American citizens concerned about our gun rights?"

Yes, if he's cheating people on a land deal and giving gun owners in general a bad name.

John
 
Actually you're both wrong.

KMKeller said:
Actually, the attribution is correct. P.T. Barnum said, "There's a sucker born every minute".
Old NFO said:
Oops, I stand corrected... Back to my corner now

In reality it was 1869 and David Hannum, who as the head of the syndicate that owned the "Cardiff Giant" was a direct competitor of P.T. Barnum's New York sideshow, who uttered the famous phrase, "There's a sucker born every minute."

Never Give A Sucker An Even Break was a 1941 movie starring W.C. Fields. (William Claude Dukenfield)
It was his last starring role.
 
The day after 9/11 Piazza was offering free training for pilots...............................
Yes. That offering was fairly typical Piazza. In bold, large print -- everywhere he advertised -- everyone heard about the FREE TRAINING for pilots. FrontSight was going to train "every commercial pilot in the world, FREE OF CHARGE..."

Of course there was a catch: the pilot had to present Front Sight with a signed, notarized letter from the CEO of the airline ... with permission to carry in the cockpit. Which at the time was a complete pipe dream. So even the initial promise wasn't worth a whole lot except as publicity.

But even that offer was retracted as soon as it seemed even marginally possible that Piazza might have to deliver on it. The original offer to train any and all commercial pilots "FREE OF CHARGE!!!" morphed into an offer to train commercial pilots but only if TSA would pay for the training.

Bait and switch.

In that case, nobody was financially harmed, because nobody paid any money to Piazza in the expectation that he would keep his initial promise. But that incident was fairly typical of the marketing practices at FS: a big, bold promise (with fine print that just about erases the promise anyway), and subject to abrupt change as soon as the publicity value was gone.

So it really isn't surprising that people who paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars relying upon promises like FREE ammunition in the machinegun classes would be somewhat disillusioned by later having to purchase ammunition for those classes. Or if they paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars relying on promises of FREE training thereafter with nothing more to pay EVER!!!, and then got dinged for $50/year background checks. Or if they paid out hundreds of thousands for a membership that was supposed to go up in value, and was a ONE TIME ONLY!!!! offering -- and then the offer was repeated, and repeated, and repeated again, lowering the value of the membership to near zero. Or if they paid out hundreds of thousands for a membership that would allow them to build a fancy home in a fancy resort community -- and then the fancy resort community simply never materialized.

You can understand why people like that might be just a leetle bit disheartened by such bait & switch tactics, and even decide to sue.

And none of that has anything to do with whether the training is good or not. The quality of the training simply isn't the issue.

pax
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top