Might as well pile on. I'll only pick on ones I know.
1) Glock. Well, okay, definitely overrated or hyped, IMO. I have one and I would NOT part with it, but it is not the be-all-end-all of handguns. My preference is for the 9mm models, as that is how Gaston originally designed it. Be careful around Glock diehards though. They don't realize the trigger sucks (relatively; it can be managed), the grip angle is funky (ditto the trigger though) and the stock sights are horrendous.
2) 1911. I don't have one, but have fired a few and again think they are a good, solid pistol when tuned and running. Nothing makes hitting at handgun ranges easier except a good S&W K,L or N frame, IMO. Again though, I think the 1911 diehards are as bad as the Glock diehards. And frankly, not to pick on them too much, but I have seen far more malfunctions with various pistols of this design than any other. Typically though it is guns the owner "tuned" himself, or in calibers other than .45 ACP.
3) H&K. Fired a USP Compact .40, once. Didn't blow my skirt up. Wasn't any easier to hit with than my Glock, kicked harder than a 1911, trigger felt awful with a forever reset and didn't feel "natural" in my hands. Also big and top heavy, more-so than a Glock IMO. H&K is NOT a no-compromise gun to me, just as my Glock is not perfection.