I really like the FS2000; more importantly, my girlfried
loves the FS2000, so that will be the resident bullpup. It is a brilliant design with one possibly fatal flaw, due in part to something that the military model can have but mine cannot. I reviewed the rules and saw nothing preventing me from linking to my own post in another forum so if I am breaking a rule with this link, I apologize in advance.
My Thoughts
If you scroll down a bit past my initial meanderings, you'll see my complaint. In short, the sear disengages in the same linear plane as the bore, and without the BATF-blacklisted safety sear in place, this necessitates the use of very stiff springs to minimize (not prevent - that is impossible) AD's. You're left with a rifle with a very stiff trigger pull that can still discharge when the butt is slammed on the ground.
It bothered me enough that I considered designing a new trigger pack to eliminate this in Autocad. Unfortunately, I'm done with school and have neither access to Autocad-equipped computers nor the required knowledge to do this any more, and it's not like FN would simply give me all the dimensions over a phone call. I also wouldn't think that such a thing would be economically viable, as this is not exactly a huge market. But maybe one day, someone else will take up the challenge. I hope so.
A Neutrigger will not fix this, but it will make the trigger pull a bit better. Those proclaiming miracles do not own trigger pull gauges apparently.
I'd still recommend it, but only after trying it out first and keeping in mind its limitations.