NRA Built Massive Gun Owner Database

Status
Not open for further replies.
dc dalton said:
To answer that question yes we do. Of people who VOLUNTARILY submit their information for membership.

And think about WHO could gain access to that list via hacking ... anyone say the NSA?
And why should I be afraid again? Is an agency going door to door taking guns away today or in the near future? Do you think the NRA would just stand back and let that happen?

May I suggest that you create more positive information about gun ownership rather than coming down on an organization that has done more for gun rights than you could do in a thousand lifetimes.
 
Just more hype and histrionics from the left. I mean, an organization that represents gun owners having a database of gun owners...how insidious!
 
Using exaggerated claims (comparing the NRAs marketing to a Givernment gun registry) does not put your organization in a good light, DC Dalton
 
You can't be ignorant of this fact considering you're the Founder at American Gun Owners Alliance so other than some antis might want to twist this piece of information into something sinister sounding (like the referenced article did) what's the point of bringing it up in an alarmist manner tarring the NRA with the anti's brush instead of alerting all of us of the article as an attack on the NRA?

Looks like the founder of another gun rights wannabe organization is bashing the NRA.

Using exaggerated claims (comparing the NRAs marketing to a Givernment gun registry) does not put your organization in a good light, DC Dalton

My feelings exactly. We have an awful lot of trouble with the anti-gunners. We do not need founders of gun rights organizations bashing the NRA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"If true it's a tad unnerving"

If true? The NRA is a lobbying group, of course they've compiled mailing lists and lists of possible donors. Just like AARP knows where the old people live. It's what they're paid to do.

You crack me up.

John
 
Is there a recommended brand of tinfoil I should buy for my hat? Cause I'm scared <deleted> right now. Lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@SharpsDressedMan

For a short time (~2 years), I was an NRA member without a gun! I remedied that situation as soon as possible, of course. ;)

The NRA is for anyone who has an interest in firearms or shooting sports.



As to the NRA compiling a database of gun owners, so what? As many others have pointed out, it's the way business is done these days. Nothing sinister at all.
 
Purchasing and selling customer lists is common practice in business and government(even when they promise that they don't). Buy a tumbler from Harbor Freight? Get a catalog in the mail a couple months later from Northern Tool. Bought a gun from Cabela's? NRA solicitations soon follow. Got car insurance or a driver license? AARP knows when you turn 49 and begin sending solicitations (and never stop).

It can be annoying, but I'm not alarmed.
 
OMG OMG OMG! Do you suppose Walgreen's has a massive data base of my condom purchases?

Funny you should mention that. This following story involves Target, not Walgreens, but Walgreens probably does the same thing:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/

For those folks who haven't figured it out yet, we live in the age of analytics. Quite frankly, I'd be upset if the NRA WASN'T taking advantage of the data that are out there. Organizations that want to grow need to be able to target their recruiting to folks that are predisposed to become members. This is good business and just plain common sense.

And if you think our friendly government doesn't already have -or could put together in a matter of a few weeks - the same info, then you aren't paying attention to current events.
 
Last edited:
I hear the Brady Campaign has a list of all gunowners, too; US Census minus their membership roles. Done.

I think I'd take my chances of abuse from an entity with no enforcement mechanism, no means of gaining one, and whose exercise of punitive force would be quickly stamped out by a jealous Uncle Sam. If the Federal government shared those characteristics, I would be comfortable with a similarly constructed database of willingly offered or public data. Since .gov is not and can not be such a "benign" entity, it cannot be trusted with that data.

TCB
 
"^^^That's not true! A lot of Brady people own guns. They just believe in double standards."

I said "membership," not "leadership" :D ;)

TCB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top