1911ShooterTJ
Member
I just read this article on CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/14/rudolph.taunts.ap/index.html
This guy is disgusting in every way. Why is he still alive? But anyways, that's just my personal opinion. But don't worry, this does have to do with guns I promise. So I was reading the article, and came upon the following line:
I'm just amazed by this kind of thinking. So why does this reasoning not apply to people who even go so far as to make it OUT of prison. As in, felons who long ago committed crimes, suddenly lose their gun rights. I know there was a THR member who went through such an ordeal due to a bad decision long ago. Maybe I’m just preaching to the choir. :banghead:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/14/rudolph.taunts.ap/index.html
This guy is disgusting in every way. Why is he still alive? But anyways, that's just my personal opinion. But don't worry, this does have to do with guns I promise. So I was reading the article, and came upon the following line:
But U.S. Attorney Alice Martin, who helped prosecute Rudolph for the Alabama bombing, said there is nothing the prison can do to restrict Rudolph or the supporter who keeps posting his writings, anti-abortion activist Donald Spitz of Chesapeake, Virginia.
"An inmate does not lose his freedom of speech," she said.
I'm just amazed by this kind of thinking. So why does this reasoning not apply to people who even go so far as to make it OUT of prison. As in, felons who long ago committed crimes, suddenly lose their gun rights. I know there was a THR member who went through such an ordeal due to a bad decision long ago. Maybe I’m just preaching to the choir. :banghead: