cslinger wrote,
This manner of thinking may work to justify YOUR planning and preparation style, but not mine. I'd like to give myself an honest chance at effectively handling the other 95% of the situations that could and would occur somewhere between those extremes.
As the saying goes, I have no "crystal ball" nor would I hazard much of a guess as to how/when/where or why any future bad things could happen. Or even where I'd be or whom I'd be with.
But it seems prudent to have the capability, knowledge, equipment AND MINDSET available to cover as many bases as humanly possible.
And that style of planning all but mandates a rifle designed for fighting.
W
In your post you've also outlined just a scant few of the thousands upon thousands of all the variations of real situational factors like foe capability/friend capability/cover availability/concealment/terrain/structure(s) and vehicle(s) that one could face - and that's the short list. Among your examples, you've picked only a few of the easiest and most difficult scenarios one could face..... All that being said I keep coming back to the old adage that in a practical SHTF situation have a gun........any gun.
This manner of thinking may work to justify YOUR planning and preparation style, but not mine. I'd like to give myself an honest chance at effectively handling the other 95% of the situations that could and would occur somewhere between those extremes.
As the saying goes, I have no "crystal ball" nor would I hazard much of a guess as to how/when/where or why any future bad things could happen. Or even where I'd be or whom I'd be with.
But it seems prudent to have the capability, knowledge, equipment AND MINDSET available to cover as many bases as humanly possible.
And that style of planning all but mandates a rifle designed for fighting.
W