Reloading Cost by the Box

Status
Not open for further replies.
If I ever have to move again, I'm screwed. Maybe my truck will hold all the lead and the bullets, but I dunno. It's [the truck] just a half ton...

Free brass has pretty much dried up here. Tweekers come out and scavenge all of it -- even .22's -- to sell as scrap metal. (they must come at the crack of dawn) But I mostly shoot revolvers, so that's not a big problem. Someday I'm gonna have to get a .40 tho' to use up the brass I've picked up over the years. Maybe a nice S&W 610 :drool:
 
At our range there are always "volunteers" that will sweep up for you on the Pistol Range. On the Rifle Ranges they merely mine the brass box.

You just need to learn the technique and you too will be getting some of that free range brass.
It's alright, I love free "range brass". I'm one of those willing volunteers who will ask to clean up after others, and mine the brass buckets for treasure.

I was just joking about what "free range" brass might be. :p
 
As far as saving money goes, as long as my wife THINKS I'm saving money she'll let me go to the range as often as I want. That to me is the true benefit of reloading :cool:
 
Cost/saving analysis of reloading threads are funny.

I like reading how other people justify what they do and how they do it. I got into reloading to save money on ammunition. Not really working out for me. I just shoot more. But I find it fun and it keeps me out of trouble so I guess it's worth it.
 
Rkhammer (posts 23 and 31)

OK, if the Lee Challenger Kit is $120 including shipping the additional cost of the other items will be upwards of another $150 if one is to be properly equipped. So, if the total cost is even only $300 it would still take over 21 boxes of ammo to break even (using my ammo cost).

While I wasn't using deep discounts or used equipment in my analysis my point was that the 12 box break-even point wasn't realistic. I do agree with you that equipment can be gotten cheaper, though. :)
Thanks for your thoughts, Rkammer. Even though you disagree with my conclusion, I believe we are in very close agreement, given the differences in our starting points.

I ran my calculations with the bench minimally furnished, with only the accoutrements absolutely necessary, leaving out such accessories as tumbler, trimmer, high-end scale, and cutting every reasonable cost corner easily cut. My loading bench for the comparison is under $250, well under. If I outfitted my theoretical handloader with a very complete setup as one could with a budget of $300.

Using my methodology and your figures, we are in very close agreement, which is what I was looking for. Thanks

Lost Sheep
 
If you're only going to load 12 boxes of {whatever}, why bother reloading at all. :)
(truncated for brevity)
Because one might load 12 boxes PER WEEK, or per year. The time factor really doesn't enter into a straight-up cost calculation.

Respectfully,

Lost Sheep
 
Cost/saving analysis of reloading threads are funny.

I like reading how other people justify what they do and how they do it. I got into reloading to save money on ammunition. Not really working out for me. I just shoot more. But I find it fun and it keeps me out of trouble so I guess it's worth it.
I know. I am glad to bring a few giggles and grins into the world.

Yes, I do shoot more because I reload. Any number of rounds per year is more than zero. If I did not load my own, I would be just shooting 22s or BBs/Pellets.

Thanks for the opinion. You are right, of course; the "cost of reloading vs retail purchase" is an overdiscussed topic (unless you are new to reloading, in which case it is all fresh and new to you). But I hoped that counting cost not by dollars, but by quantity of ammo, the comparison could be applied across the years and across borders/currency exchanges and across different marketplaces. In some areas of the country some components, equipment and ammunition prices vary a lot. I was thinking of making the stale, old "cost" discussion a little bit newer by leaving the currency behind and looking at commodities.

After all, a man does not buy a drill because he needs a drill. He buys a drill because he needs holes.

Lost Sheep
 
Just to make things simple, when it comes to .38 Specials I can shoot more than 4 to 1 when reloading over buying factory ammo for the same price...

On top of shooting 200 rounds or more instead of 50 I'm also firing more accurate ammo than I can buy. Add the fact reloading is very relaxing and a hobby in itself there's a lot of good reasons to reload.

When it's very cold in the middle of the Winter I spend my shooting time reloading instead. Then when the weather breaks there's plenty of ammo to shoot all Summer long. I even process all my rifle brass in the Winter (clean, deprimed, sized, primer pockets cleaned, trimmed, deburred and chamfered) and load them as needed. You can load 40 or 50 rounds of rifle ammo quite quickly when the brass is ready to go...
 
Here are my 2 cents...
I have been reloading on my friends Dillion 650 for nearly 20 years..well, I broke down and purchased my own last year. I shoot PPC matches, 45's and 38's. I start practicing the first week of Jan. for a match usually in mid-April..once a week with both guns, 150-200 rounds each week. Then by March I start shoot 6 times a month up until the time of the match. I couldn't afford to shoot like that if I didn't reload. I enter 3 events and have 17 medals over the last 8 years. Practice is my edge and reloading keeps it in my budget.
 
I've played this game several times on the forum. It gets old after a while.


Bottom line - Reloaded rounds cost about half of comparable factory ammo. Want cheap junk? Buy it, or load it. It'll cost about half reloaded. Want primo ammo? But it, or load it. It'll cost about half reloaded.


I handload because I get a whole lot more flexibility with what I shoot over what I can buy. And there are some things I shoot nobody produces.
 
OK,
price check on aisle 4,, .45 ACP per 50 x12
Per round pricing...
brass--------$.02 ea.
primers------$.03 ea
bullets-------$.12 ea
powder------$.02 ea.
total---------$.19 ea
total per 50--$9.50
X12 boxes---$114.00

thats the approximate breakdown of what it costs me,
multiplied by lots of rounds for lots of calibers, = lots more shooting for my money.:D
 
This subject gets brought up all the time, same results. Everyone brags about how cheap their ammo is to reload, but it is rarely apples to apples or comprehensive. Its much like when people talk about their efficiency when brewing beer.

One comparison here was 9mm WWB FMJ and then it is compared to the cost of 9mm with cast lead bullets? No personal offense, but factory made FMJs are a bit more expensive than bullets someone casts themself using wheel weights they got for free. It is also not fair to compare a brand new cased 9mm WWB to a once-fired case you are using.

If that is your metric, compare it to once fired ammo from Ultramax or another manufacturer to be fair. These threads are more rigged than a Don King fight, especially when many people refuse to even put a price on their time, which is the most ridiculous and self-serving way to ensure your ammunition is always cheaper than factory.

I haven't saved a single dime!

Exactly, and you probably loved every minute of it. Economics are only on your side for a few calibers when you make an honest comparison, but in the end, you are talking about what is a hobby to most people on here. Enjoy it and shoot up your "savings" like the rest of us.
 
"especially when many people refuse to even put a price on their time"

I completely disagree - I put the same price on my free time spent reloading as I put on my free time spent watching TV or my free time spent enjoying any of my other hobbies. Free time speaks for itself.

I have never enjoyed a hobby using hours I would otherwise have been earning $$$.

Most all reloaders would agree that they spend the same or more money now that they reload but can now shoot a lot more for the same money spent.
 
Why oh why do folks who want to criticize reloading continue to confuse economic cost and accounting cost?


Discussion of the terms here -
http://www.unc.edu/depts/econ/byrns_web/Economicae/Essays/Profit.htm

We really do need to contain our discussion of the cost of reloading vs. store-bought ammunition to the real costs, the explicit costs. Otherwise you'd need to factor in the implicit cost for everything we do . . . time actually shooting the ammo, time spent eating, sleeping . . .

Everything in life has an opportunity cost. The term itself is confusing for those not familiar with the science of Economics. But just as Economics is not concerned with the study of money, the cost in opportunity cost is not a dollar value.

I sympathize with Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell. For lack of a basic education, I continually see people make this basic mistake in arguments criticizing the reloading hobby. The opportunity cost of reloading is not a dollar value. That cost does have a value, but it's expressed in what the reloader gave up to engage in the activity, not dollars.


If it takes a reloader one hour to load his ammo, he gave up what he could have otherwise accomplished in that hour. It could be washing dishes, watching a television show, time with the wife and kids . . . but none of those are a dollar value.

I hate doing dishes, so let's say I loaded ammo instead of washing dishes. The opportunity cost for reloading 200 rounds of ammunition was having clean dishes. I could not express the opportunity cost as a dollar value until I gave up doing something that generated income to load my ammunition.
 
True Apples vs Apples with real world price checks

Deavis said:
One comparison here was 9mm WWB FMJ and then it is compared to the cost of 9mm with cast lead bullets? No personal offense, but factory made FMJs are a bit more expensive than bullets someone casts themself using wheel weights they got for free. It is also not fair to compare a brand new cased 9mm WWB to a once-fired case you are using.

If that is your metric, compare it to once fired ammo from Ultramax or another manufacturer to be fair. These threads are more rigged than a Don King fight, especially when many people refuse to even put a price on their time, which is the most ridiculous and self-serving way to ensure your ammunition is always cheaper than factory.

I did this exercise in February in another similar thread. I'll repost it here:



OK, if you think his numbers are off then we'll use my calcs. I stopped going through this mental exercise almost 20 twenty years ago when I started reloading. But we'll go through it again for instructional purposes. Nearly every time I tried to compare factory ammo of similar quality to what I can handload, I find I'd have to pay roughly double buying factory. As you will see, we'll arrive at roughly the same figure.


I shoot 175gr Sierra MatchKings through my .308 in 600 yard F-class matches. I go through roughly 1,000 a year, so we'll figure out how much that costs both factory and handloaded.

You're in luck! I just got my MidwayUSA sale flyer for February. MidwayUSA has them on sale this month. Federal 308 Win Premium Gold Medal Rifle Ammunition
$220.99 per 200. That's $130.00 off the regular price. Now that's a deal! Or is it? We shall see . . .


We'll start with the bullet components. They're on sale too! $134.99 per 500.
Sierra 175gr Sierra MatchKing We'll need two boxes. And just to be nice, I'll even pretend we missed the sale and use the regular price of $144.99 = call it $300 for bullet components (round up for shipping).


I can get my primers and powder at my local gunshop, so I do . . . 1,000 primers cost me roughly $30.00 per thousand. I can get 8lbs of IMR4895 at my local retailer for $140.00, but I don't need 8 lbs. We only need 6 to load up 1k .308s, so that's $100.00 even.

I still have about 2k in .308 brass here, and haven't needed to buy any in many years. But let's say I did need to buy it. Let's go get 200 pieces of brass, they'll last at least 8 reloads so 200 is plenty to go have 5 afternoons of fun. Whoa . . . Federal is selling brass again. Cool. :) They ceased offering it for years once CCI/Blount bought the company - I just learned something. $23.99 per 50, so we'll need 4 boxes = call it an even $100.00.
Federal .308 brass

So, the components cost us $530.00.

That great sale on the exact same Federal factory round with those Sierra bullets is $1,104.95, before shipping. See, roughly half.


But what about my press and equipment you ask? I do own a LOT of reloading equipment and tools. But I've been using the same Lee press for over 15 years. My scale, powder measure, and dies about the same time frame. That's what we accountants call capital assets, like your car. In fact, I've gone through several cars since I began reloading. My tools are still here.

The equipment it takes to load should be spread out over time, a long period of time, and not justified in a "break-even" analysis. I know guys who are still using their same equipment from 40 years ago. The problem with trying to figure out how many units it takes to pay back capital is tough when you don't know how many units you'll produce on it over it's whole life. And you will see that the components will eventually cost more then the equipment over time.

We'll capitalize the costs and amortize them out over 20 years.


Lee Classic Cast press $99.99, great press.
RCBS's premium scale $151.99
RCBS powder measure $86.99
Lee dies $30.99. Awesome dies, but barely even worth capitalizing.

If I were doing this "for real", none of this stuff would be worth enough for an accountant to bother capitalizing anyway. It's just not material enough. Let's throw in another $200.00 for calipers and other assorted small case prep tools. We're up to $569.96 in equipment, just barely over the cost of the components. And if you are curious, by happenstance we also just broke even, almost to the penny.

Amortized that equipment's going to cost me just under $30/year over 20 years. Merely shooting nothing but 1,000 rounds of .308 every year costs me $530.00 per year in components (at todays' prices by the way). You can see why over a lifetime of shooting why we say the equipment is such a small cost over the cost of the actual components that it can practically be ignored. That same factory ammo on sale was $1,104.95.


Half. It's always half the price to load the same quality yourself. Check my numbers and sources. They're all real-world and documented.


The only question you have to ask yourself is this. Why pay someone else to do work you can do yourself for half the price?

There are no other "true costs". The opportunity cost is "what else were you going to do tonight?" I reload while listening to the nightly news.
 
Bullfrog, nice to see another accountant on here. I'm a CA (same as CPA) from Canada. In all my analysis (I had to do it before I bought in even though I was going to reload anyway :)) the cheap ammunition (read Federal Powershok) reloading costs about 60%-65% of the factory ammo, but anything up from there was right around 50%. I buy the cheap stuff to get brass and then reload it. Our component costs are a bit higher compared to ammunition up here.

You did a good job explaining the relevant costs, so that should be enough for anyone to decide whether it's worth it from the cost perspective. By the way, it's too much fun to not do it.

Have a great day.
 
Thanks. I hope someone else besides another accountant can understand the explanation. A true master of his craft can explain challenging concepts with ease to a layperson. I'm not there yet, but I make my best effort.


By the way, those prices really haven't changed a whole lot in 10 months, but they have changed a bit, haven't they? I've seen bullet and brass component prices rise a bit. Because of the metals used in them the devaluation of the dollar is making its presence felt.

1,000 rounds of that Federal Gold Medal Match at regular price is a whopping $1,500-$1,600. The cost in the exact same components used to load them is still about $550-$600. The premium ammunition does tend to cost a good bit more. I speculate it's due to more attention from quality controls and increased testing.

But yes, usually it's somwhere around half the price of the pre-assembled ammo, for the opportunity cost of dirty dishes. :D
 
Yep, let's save!

I will post this now, knowing I will have much more to say later. However, I am setting up to do my own reloading, and have already spent close to $1,000 and have yet to purchase even the bullets, primers, or powder. Trust me, I know it's gonna save me lots to do my own reloading. (chuckle, chuckle)
 
There are many good analyses here.

Another way to analyze the cost of reloading is to determine how many rounds it takes before the cost of the reloading equipment is paid for in savings from reloading.
As others have said so well, a lot depends on what you're looking for in your ammo. Plinking ammo is much less than match grade. And, if you're competing, you can tune your ammo to get better accuracy than factory ammo.
Another key variable is the value of your time. This is a personal decision. For me, I have time and choose to value my time reloading as $0. In fact, there's some positive value to me [i.e., it's kind of a hobby] and would actually reduce the actual dollar cost of a round.

My only real experience is with 223 rem and 308 win. For both of those, the out of pocket cost per round is about $.33 for 233 and $.47 for 308. That includes the cost of cleaning the brass and the cost of the brass spread over the expected number of reload. That represents about $.50 per round savings for 223 and about $.93 per round savings for 308.

Assume my set of reloading presses, dies, guages, mics, etc cost $2000.

So, I've recouped my 'overhead' costs in 4000 rounds for 223 or just over 2000 rounds of 308. After that, I begin to realize actual $ savings [again assuming I'm willing to not charge for my time.]

HTH
 
jelenko, the equipment isn't overhead. It's either your fixed cost, sunk cost, or your capital cost, depending on how you want to look at it.

The components are the variable cost. The equipment you bought is bought, and it isn't going to change (unless you buy more) as you load your ammunition. The variable costs do. To load 1,000 rounds you need 1,000 bullets, 1,000 primers, and X amount of powder. To load 500, you need 500 . . . and so forth.

If you bought the equipment but loaded none, then your variable cost is zero.



Furthermore, the Break-Even analysis is the least used, and least valuable forecasting model in business and accounting to evaluate a capital purchase or business decision.


I guess for our purposes it'll work, but with the Federal .308 GM Match example I laid out above, you should have noticed that the cost of components quickly surpasses the cost of the equipment. It's so insignificant that it really doesn't factor into the total explicit costs of loading ammunition yourself.
 
First off, I want to say great posting by BullfrogKen. I seem to recall reading the thread where he made that initial comparison a few months back as well.

Second, I don't think it's worth looking at breaking the cost down by box, or how much savings, or whatever. It's a hobby to enjoy while engaging in another hobby. If you want to do it, you'll do it. If you don't want to reload, you won't, and you will justify it by saying "I could by X amount of ammo" or "For the price of *equipment* I could have a new *SIG/H&K/Remington/Winchester*".

In a straight up apples-to-apples comparison, it's about half the cost to make ammo versus buying the same thing off the shelf. I reload .223 match ammo for about the cost of the FMJ bulk plinking packs at the big box mart. If the goal is to only have the ammunition, without any regard for how well it shoots, yes, it would be easier to buy. But I need the better performance of a good match load for what I do (see my sig line) and I sure am NOT going to pay the retail price for Black Hills or Federal.

It's the same way in hunting rifle ammunition. I can get a box of 100 Sierra ProHunters for my .30-30 for about $22. Add $25 for a pound of powder (good for about 200 rounds) and 2 trays of primers ($7 at LGS pricing) and I've spent about $42 for that 100 rounds. The same 100 rounds loaded in the green-and-yellow box would be about $80-85 locally, maybe a bit less if you catch a pre-hunting season sale.

In handguns I like to shoot Magnum revolvers. My current favorite is .357. Locally these run $24/50 at box mart for 158gr JSP Federal .357. My reloads run 158gr Noslers ($34/250, caught on sale), CCI-500s ($35/1000, LGS), Alliant 2400 ($25/lb, about 500 per pound) and Remington cases (bought when the scare started, I think $22/100). Fudging a little for case-life cost, I get under $12 for the same 50 reloaded, and it takes about 10 minutes to make once the press is set-up.

And unless I start working multiple jobs to fill in all of the empty hours in an evening or weekend, reloading time doesn't cost me anything (as BfK explains so eloquently). Well, maybe loss of Internet posting or TV watching time. No big losses there... ;) (Actually, I could say reloading time is a fraction of the time spent practicing, traveling and shooting matches.)
 
I never tracked this before, but just so I'd have a basis for comparison....

Earlier today I loaded 50 .38SPL plinker rounds as follows:

- Magtech 158gr LRN bullet .....$.11
- CCI 500 primer ....$.03
- 3.3gr Bullseye ....$ .01 based on 2121 rounds from one pound at $20/lb (which is high, but I'll assign a penny to it)
- My own brass (either range pick-up or acquired from simply not tossing it when I shot it)

So that's a high estimate of 15 cents/round, or $7.50 for a box of 50.

Midway currently has Magtech 158gr LRN ammo on sale for $13.99/50-round box, which one might say is not a bad price. But my home rolled 158gr-ers cost just over half the factory ammo price, and they're tuned for my 642 vs being shootable by any .38spl on Earth. Plus, I enjoyed the process of making the rounds and seeing them finished, so I don't count my time. (I suspect I spent a total of maybe 2 minutes per round from pick-up to crimp, and I'm slow.)

The formula would of course vary for different calibers, weights, bullet types, etc., but this is a reasonably representative sample. I'll take that every time.

It's almost to the point where I'll go shoot so I'll have some brass to work up.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top