Guns are weapons (gun are delivery systems; bullets are weapons unless you're beating someone w/ said gun)
This may have come from a movie scene in which someone did that, but that gun wasn't even a Glock, but a Beretta. Movie scenes, by their very nature, are contrived, scripted and choreographed. It is also possible for someone to grab the slide and push it back out of battery, which would keep the gun from firing, but not disassemble it.
As you point out, essentially no peace officer carries an open rig. And all these incidents certainly do have bearing when the subject is the danger of a particular holster design. I've put up a number of links implicating enclosed holsters and ND. You've put up opinion and conjecture. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but your imagination hardly trumps reality.First link does not mention anything about whether the holster was covered or open. Second link has many incidents, none of which mention whether they're covered or open. Third link has one incident, which also does not mention whether the holster was covered or open. Most of these incidents involved guns which were either unholstered or being unholstered/reholstered at the time of the discharge, and as such have no bearing on this issue.
There are really 2 recoil events when a rifle is fired. The acceleration of the bullet down the bbl apoun firing and the escaping gasses pushing the rifle rearward as the bullet exits the muzzle
Oh no. Not that quite united. Yet.Quote:
Gun owners are one united front with their ideals and personal feelings and agree on everything.
There is still so much to be done to unite everybody. There are still way too much fence sitters out there.
escaping gas can't push the gun gun rearbards,
Newton's third law
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
That would require a muzzle velocity of 36,700 fps. I imagine recoil would be impressive.
Recoil starting after the bullet leaves the barrel.
Because of reaction time we generally don't feel the recoil until the bullet has actually left the barrel. otherwise guns would not be accurate as we would be jerking uncontrollably as the bullet was passing through the barrel.True, this is false, but isn't it true that some guns are designed to keep the slide in place until the bullet has left the barrel?Quote:
Recoil starting after the bullet leaves the barrel.
'The M4 is deadlier than the M16 because the bullets tumble out of a short barrel.' ...I blame the 'patriot pistol' scene in Metal Gear Solid 3. Thankfully I haven't had anyone SERIOUSLY state that 'you can get unlimited ammo by wearing the right headband'
Ha ha! if only! .. or maybe i just need to buy a drum thats shaped like the "infinity" symbol
Quote:
This may have come from a movie scene in which someone did that, but that gun wasn't even a Glock, but a Beretta. Movie scenes, by their very nature, are contrived, scripted and choreographed. It is also possible for someone to grab the slide and push it back out of battery, which would keep the gun from firing, but not disassemble it.
That was the Jackie Chan movie: "Who am I" and under the circumstances, where the shooter was dumbfounded to learn that his gun wouldn't shoot, it MAY have been possible for someone with the hand skills that Jackie Chan has to take a Beretta down like that. Then again, Jackie Chan is not your average Joe when it comes to stuff like that and has spent his life learning to pull-off incredible stunts for real that most people can only dream of.
On top of that, having done multiple movie scenes with fancy stunts in taking Berettas down, it is pretty clear that Jackie Chan has had allot of practice in doing it.
but isn't it true that some guns are designed to keep the slide in place until the bullet has left the barrel?
Recoil may not happen after the bullet leaves the barrel but our reaction does.