The .45 makes a comeback during the war on terrorism

Status
Not open for further replies.
Equation Flow?

If - "But newer +P+ loadings of 9mm actually have MORE energy."

And - Energy is measured in Ft/Lbs

And - You need hollow point bullets to be effective

And - Winchester Ranger ammunition is loaded with Hollow Point bullets.
And Hollow Point bullets expand to the same resulting diameters in both calibers.


Therefore - Greater Ft/Lbs = Greater Effectiveness


<sigh> If only it were that simple. :banghead:
 
With all due respect, it sounds like a Kimber ad. Sean is right about slide frame fit. Everybody that's tried to sell me a Kimber emphasizes that aspect right off. "Wow! Look at that slide frame fit. Ain't no Colt put together like that." Marketing hype.
 
JHP is not allowed in military applications. 9mm does not stack up when you compare hard ball ammo offerings in normal pressures.

Even if a perp is not killed, the impact of a .45ACP in many cases will put them on their rearend-----even if the bad guy gets a frontal hit with kevlar vest employed.

The 1911 is a dangerous design and a Glock is not? Give me a break.

I am in the process of making the paradigm shift from High Cap. 9mm with +P to a 1911 with ball ammo.

My reasoning is to practice with the ammo I carry versus practicing with one version of fodder and carrying something else.

Additionally, the 1911 was designed for ball.
 
artherd,

No disrespect but you are comparing +P+ with standard velocity. I am sure this was an oversight and not deliberate.

Velocity (fps) Energy (ft-lbs) Barrel
Symbol Cartridge Bullet Wt. Muzzle 5 Yds 25 Yds Muzzle 25 Yds Length
RA9TA 9MM+P+ 127 gr. 1250 1236 1183 441 395 4"
RA45TP 45 Auto+P 230 gr. 990 985 965 501 475 5"

Now look at the energy and tell me that the 9mm has more. Even with the standard loaded .45 at 25 yards the +P+ .9mm only has 11 ft-lbs more energy.

When you compare +P+ with standard velocity you are comparing apples to oranges.

By the way, the figures came from the chart you cited.

DM
 
Double Maduro- no oversight. 9mm +P+ is quite comprable to standard pressure loaded .45ACP. My reasoning is safe ammo in a variety of guns. the +P+ 9mm is factory specified by Glock and Beretta, etc.

Find me a 1911 maker who specifies .45ACP +P as safe, and I'll revise my claims down to "ok, so 9mm's max loading and .45's max loading are withing a few ft/lbs of each other"

Waxed Canvas- if you seriously think that good 9mm hollowppoint to .45 *FMJ* is an upgrade, then I hope you never have to use your handgun to save lives. You will be in for quite the shock. (as will anyone standing behind you when your FMJ overpenetrates.)

Come on '.45 puts them on their rear end?' And 9mm with the same energy level, traveling faster, somehow dosen't? Where do you get this stuff?
 
<sigh> If only it were that simple.

Explain to me why it is not 'that simple'? I'm all ears.


Come on guys, .45 and 9mm are both great rounds. I think I've shown that for all intents and purposes, they are essentially stoping equals (when used and loaded correctly for maximum effect.)

So it all boils down to: Use what you shoot most accurately and be done with it.
 
Okay.

I feel more comfortable with a caliber that does not require a " hopped up " round to be consistently effective.

Any way you cut it, I feel much better with a FMJ or JHP 230 grain .45ACP in standard pressure loadings than I do a 9mm in standard pressure fodder.

Yes 9mm in +P+ is as effective but why subject a gun to undue stress if you do not have to?

Do I think 9mm +P+ is more effective than .45ACP ball? Sure I do.

Speaking only for myself, I will take a .45ACP over a 9mm every time as I like the idea of a large, slow moving hunk of lead versus a smaller, faster one.

Nonetheless if you prefer 9mm, I respect that.
 
Find me a 1911 maker who specifies .45ACP +P as safe, and I'll revise my claims down to "ok, so 9mm's max loading and .45's max loading are withing a few ft/lbs of each other"

I checked on a few websites, and only Springfield and Smith & Wesson had anything about +P ammunition.

Springfield's manual states, "1911-A1 Ultra-Compact Pistols are designed to use standard pressure ball ammo and self-defense loads. +P ammunition is not recommended in pistolrs shorter than 5 inches." I couldn't find anything else about it in the manual, despite numers bold, underlined, red warnings on a number of other topics, so it seems like +P ammunition is ok for use in goverment sized 1911s.

This was the only thing I could find about +P ammunition in the S&W manual: "'Plus-P' (+P) ammunition... should not be used in Smith & Wesson medium (K frame) revolvers manufactured prior to 1958." Nothing about using the ammo in 1911s despite more bold, red warnings on lots of other topics, so again it seems like it's acceptable.

I didn't see anything on the Colt, Kimber, or Auto-Ordinance websites, but if someone wanted to contact them about it we could probably find out their views on it. Personally, I don't think it's that important, though. I guess the current statement is "ok, so 9mm's max loading and .45's max loading are withing a few ft/lbs of each other" even though the energy difference between .45 +P and 9mm +P+ is greater than the energy difference between 9mm +P+ and standard pressure .45? :D
 
Artherd,

You said,

"Find me a 1911 maker who specifies .45ACP +P as safe, and I'll revise my claims down to "ok, so 9mm's max loading and .45's max loading are withing a few ft/lbs of each other"

For your information there are many other firearms that fire .45acp besides 1911 pistols. Ruger is one, although it has a lot in common with the 1911.

The following comes from page 12 of the ruger P90 manual, the message is repeated in all of the P series manuals that I have seen.


"The Ruger P-Series pistols are compatible with all factory ammunition loaded to U.S. Industry Standards, including high-velocity and hollow-point loads, loaded in brass, aluminum, or steel cartridge cases. ."No 9mm x 19, .45 ACP or .40 S & W ammunition manufactured in accordance with NATO, U.S., SAAMI, or CIP stan-dards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in these pistols

The bold was added by me.

So you see that your prejudice against the .45 is misguided. There are many pistols that can fire +p and even +p+ .45 ammo.

You really should get your facts straight before you try to baffle us with BS.

DM
 
A 9MM still has to expand to equal a 45.

I've never seen a 45 shrink.

In FMJ or hollow-point, you are still launching about double the bullet mass with the 45 at a respectable velocity.

Would I use a 9MMP to defend myself with? Most certainly, but given the choice and ammo availability, make mine a 45 ACP.
 
You guys are all free to like and shoot what you want. I have no adjenda here (except perhaps to not get killed with an over-penetrating FMJ round.)

Double Maduro. The article specifically adressed the 1911. I specifically adressed the 1911. There sure are pistols capable of handling Hot .45. The HK USP is one of them. Roumor has it the MK23 is even rated for .45SUPER. That is one serious round. But it it beyond the realm of this dicussion.


The fact is, the 9mm +P+ figures given are from a 4" barrel.

The .45 figures come from 5" bbls.

I have a 5" bbl 9mm, so let's compare apples to apples. Care to chrono loads against me?

Now that we're into 1" of bbl legnth, and splitting hairs, it seems pretty obvious to conclude that .45 and 9mm are essentially equals in design, and will differ only slightly in execution as sidearm weapons when JHPs are used.

Since I don't carry FMJ and furthur consider it's use to be dangerous and negligent, that should pretty much do it.

You guys can use 'feel good logic' all you want, but it does not change the laws of physics.


Carry what you can shoot well! I like both, and would trust my life to either.
 
Even if a perp is not killed, the impact of a .45ACP in many cases will put them on their rearend-----even if the bad guy gets a frontal hit with kevlar vest employed.
:scrutiny:

Bwahahahahaha!

:p
 
Waxed Canvas,

If you think that a .45, or for that matter ANY handgun is consistently effective, or will "put a man on his rear end" you need to stop reading Chuckie Taylor and Jeffie Cooper and come on out and live in the real world!

Anything that doesn't stop after being hit by hardball from a 9MM, .40, or 10MM wouldn't have stopped if hit by a .45.

The "legendary stopping power" of the .45 is a myth. An old urban legend perpetuated by writers who make money writing hokey articles for gunrags.
 
All that said, give me a .451 caliber over .355 any time. 'Friend of the wife's is a Lady Officer for Fort Worth, TX PD. One day she came by and I proudly displayed my kahr 9mm K9. She recoiled back and basicaly said: " Dude, me and your wife and our friends are going out for dinner so I don't have time to tell you all the horror stories associated with the 9mm caliber that have happened to her department. " She did leave me with a yarn about how ineffective it was for her when she needed to penetrate auto glass during a shoot out.

I traveled for 14 years. Once while in Chicago, I quizzed an LEO in o'Hare Airport to find out the units working in area housing projects prefer the .45ACP since it will put a perp, at close range mind you, on his rear end even if he has kevlar on.

Once my wife's little sister dated a SEAL. I asked him what he prefered in handguns. Sig P 226? No, for him it was a 1911 in .45ACP.

I used to lift weights with a Detective for Shreveport, LA PD. They carried a Glock 17 until one night while on a call it took a man he worked with 9 frontal shots of 9mm JHP +P to put a bad down. The Dept then went to the Glock 22.

I base my choices not off of ballistics tables or magazines but from real life experiences.
 
artherd, not trying to hijack the thread or start an argument - just give some facts....the 230 grain fmj .45 in standard pressure is not overpenetrative on humans, that is a myth. (The physics of bigger, heavier and slower vs smaller, lighter and faster) 9mm fmj on the other hand is more able to overpenetrate in the 115 and 124 grain loadings (I can think of lots of situations on a battlefield where penetration would be a good thing). I am talking about solid upper torso hits, not hits just barley catching skin. 147 grain 9mm I am not sure of, it has more weight and is subsonic in it's speed..?? (Any physicians or people with personal experience on board who has saw upper torso hits with it please chime in.....as well as anyone with any knowledge of the 180 grain fmj 40s)

I once thought the way you do, until I did some checking and gained some experience and then I found out that the truth was not as I had thought. Check with some physicians, soldiers, and law officers who have saw the effects or used the .45 230 fmj loading and you'll find out what I did....that 'ol big bullet ain't too bad in it's original form...sure, an expanded Ranger T may (or may not - depends on the circumstances) work better, but the heavy slug is alright on it's on. Skin, tissue, and muscles stretch and return to shape, leaving the damage done to be what was actually penetrated, cut or crushed - I'm told it's hard to tell a difference in the majority of defensive handgun calibers in a lot of bullet paths - haven't saw but one autopsy personally, where a handgun was used - a .357 magnum - it exited, don't know what kind of bullet it was, but the path was just a hole through the vital areas (heart included). I have saw smaller caliber (.22 and .25) wounds (some fatal) to the head and chest and leg that didn't exit.

There are exceptions to everything, that definetly includes handgun ammunition performance. More than anything, it's putting it where it will do it's job - that includes having a rd that is able to get where it needs to be to do that job - not just it's placement on the surface - be that chest or head or pelvis.

Overpenetration with good guys on the far side is bad, but then again, should you be firing in that situation?? Not if you can help it, of course...can you help it, maybe not....and if not, then you had dang well better know you can hit your target....a situation that we teach our people to kneel down before firing (if possible) so that the rds are headed at an upward angle........no one wants to be in that kind of mess. Whats between your ears is the weapon that needs to be utilized the most.

Ken


*edited to say 'upper' torso hits - my fingers outrun my brain again, sigh.
 
Last edited:
Waxed Canvas- there are good 9mm rounds for auto glass. The Ranger series is exhaustively tested against many barriers, auto glass included.

I know of several instances where two .45ACP hollowpoints to the chest failed to stop as well. Thankfully a thrid to the head did the job. There's one of 5 rounds of .41MAG ceneter of mass FTS. I also know of at least one documented case where *12* rounds of .308" rifle bullets (about half from a .30-06 Win 70 and the other half from an M14) failed to stop. 13 or 14 finally put him down.

I'll take 18 rounds of .355" at 400+lb-ft over 7 rounds of .451" at 400+lb-ft. (but honestly, either one will do about equally well.)


Ken- intresting point, while FMJ 9mm will certinly be more of an over-penetration hazard (and should never IMO be used for civilian defense because of it.)

http://www.sightm1911.com/Care/45acp.htm
"The penetration of the .45 ACP 230-grain FMJ bullet is 26" in ballistic gelatin, making it problematic and dangerous as a personal defense load."


Here, at a very well regarded ammo test site, their gelatin blocks are only 22" deep. Both of the crappy hollowpoints that failed to expand penetrated *THE ENTIRE BLOCK* (to be fair, the ????ty 9mm HPs over penetrated their 18.5" block too. That's why I advocate GOOD HPs like the Winchester Ranger in either calibre!:

http://www.ammolab.com/45acp_1.htm


Lastly, the 9mm expanded to .69, .67, and .65". The .45 expanded to .67".
 
Yes, yes, I had read of the 'overpenetration' of ballistic gelatin also. Heck, I've tested ammo in ballistic gelatin - the Winchester Ranger series was going up against all takers - when Precision Delta came to the Academy to demonstrate. But the thing is, you see, people are not made out of ballistic gelatin. That is just the medium that is used for comparision purposes and really doesn't account for what a bullet will do inside of the infinite number of differently composed bodies along with what they may be wearing.

Now, before you have a stroke, I do realize that you're trying to get the best bullet you can and for that I applaud you, I've been traveling down that road myself, but I also want you to know that the saying "there ain't no magic bullet" is true. It's just , you see, everything you read ain't the truth - a lot of the time, it's just plain speculation or sales hype and some of the time it's just a theory.

The over penetration tendency of the .45 230 FMJ falls in the 'speculation and theory' category of people who haven't gotten first hand knowledge or only limited information.

By the way, I use the Ranger T .45 (not +P) in my 1911 also, but I keep a spare mag loaded with good 'ol hardball just in case. If I didn't have the Ranger load and all I had was hardball, I would feel just about as well armed - refer to the part about placement and depth to get the job done.

I ain't a "it's got to be a .45 or nothin' " kind of guy either, my G26 is loaded with the 147 Ranger T - but I wouldn't feel too bad if it was just the Winchester white box 147 FMJ flat point.

Keep an open mind and talk to the people who have seen it - it'll open your eyes my friend.

Know your weapon and it's limitations....and pray regularly !

Ken
 
"John Browning’s venerable .45 caliber automatic pistol."

When it was adopted, it wasn't venerable... it was "New Fangled". Veneration came some time later...
:D
 
Why would spec-ops or any military want a single stack 8rd 1911 instead of a 13rd Glock 21 or 12rd HK USP? :confused:
 
..

evidently they see something they like. Maybe it is accuracy, dependability, power or a combination of any or all.

DM
 
..

by the way, the Portland, OR pd is pulling all of it's glock 21's, seems they have had some Kabooms. These can't be attributed to the same lot of ammo as they happened over a span of 3 years.

DM
 
Double Maduro, you might want to check the Oregon story out. There is a thread on it that just ended about a week ago, and it was filled with information that contradicted what you just said.

It's fascinating to watch rumors spread on the Internet. It's like when you whisper: "Use any oil of the proper weight" in someone's ear, they pass it on down a line of people, and it comes back, "My granny's got a boil on her taint."

I predict someone picks up the bit of misinformation you just posted and restates it as fact.
 
It is a Federal law that when waxing poetic about the 1911, at some point within the first two paragraphs, you must use the word "venerable".
 
Lobotomy boy,
___________________________________________________________
I predict someone picks up the bit of misinformation you just posted and restates it as fact.
____________________________________________________________

I hope they restate it, because it is fact, and before you accuse someone of spreading untrue rumors, you should read the thread.

Is this the thread you are referring to?

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthre...age=25&highlight=portland police&pagenumber=1

Show me where what I stated is wrong.

By the way, here is another link for you.

http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=65410

and another one

http://glocktalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=228994&highlight=NLETS

I live in Portland, saw the story on the news and read it in the paper, I have talked to several police officers about it as well. It is true, PPB is dumping there Glock 21's and going to 9mm because the .45's have shown a tendancy to go KABOOM.

I am not glock bashing, I don't care what you think of the weapon system. The only reason I don't own one is that they don't fit my hand.

Do your research and don't accuse people of spreading internet rumors unless you can back it up.

DM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top