The Winchester 97....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dave McCracken

Moderator In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,936
Location
MD.
There's a fair amount of interest in these, and in an effort to cut down on my typing things over and over and over, here's a base thread for the Archives.

And, I'm no expert on these, but I'm happy to pass on what I know....

J M Browning was to firearms design what Michaelangelo was to chapel ceilings, but he was human.

When Winchester brought out a pump shotgun JMB designed as the 93 Winchester in 1893, some glitches crept out of the bushes. So, some redesign and reworking, the 97 Winchester was born in 1897, of course. Some 93 and 97 parts interchange, but not all.

Shotgunners of the time had few repeaters. Winchester's old lever action shotguns were cranky and problem ridden, Christian Spencer's company had brought out another one with less than reliable functioning, and Marlin's pump had a tendency to blow up.

The 93 and 97 were among the first shotguns built for smokeless powders, and being JMB designs, were overbuilt to a strength well beyond any possible need.

Most shotgunners got along with two shots at most until the 97 appeared.

All of a sudden, firepower was at hand.The 6 round magazine gave market gunners and waterfowlers in general chances to waste more ammo as well as reduce the waterfowl population severely. The Conservation movement in part evolved because of the efficiency of the 97 at harvesting trainloads of ducks, geese, swans and cranes.

Not just market gunners and game hogs liked the 97.

John Philip Sousa owned one, a high grade with engraving and pretty wood made to his measure.

So did Annie Oakley, who used it in Wild West shows, along with other shotguns.

T Roosevelt had a couple, So did Tom Mix.

Writer Jack London had one he used regularly on his sailboat.

Winchester brought out trap versions, field versions, presentation guns,skeet versions, takedowns, martial and law enforcement versions.The best engravers in the US used the flat receiver surfaces as canvas for their finest work. It was available from the factory with either a straight or half pistol grip, could be had in the TD version with a hardcase similar to those of today, and custom stocks could be made to measure for a few dollars more.

As fast as the hunters grabbed onto the 97, so did those folks who defended their own as well as other folks' lives. Both the Border Patrol and Texas Rangers appreciated the utility of a shotgun that held 7 rounds without reloading and had them early. Wells Fargo armed their railroad guards with them also. Prisons and Police depts followed suit, and the Army had them on the Mexican Punitive Expedition in 1916.

The short barreled versions were the first "Serious" shotguns capable of multiple shots and a high rate of fire. The "Fan Fire" feature meant lots of buck could be launched quickly. The awesome reliability and durability of the model 97 became legend even before WWI.

And then, Pershing went to France with the American forces. Model 97s went with them, and things happened.

Backtracking a bit, let's look at the typical WWI military rifle. It shot one projectile at a time, had a maximum usable range of maybe 600 yards, and could shot 5 times or so before reloading. The Lee Enfield held ten.

On the other hand, ranges in the Hell of trench warfare ran close to very close, and precision fire was less crucial than the ability to neutralize hostiles at rock throwing range before they neutralized us.

IIRC, one US unit not long in the meatgrinder that was the front lines had 600 Model 97s and lots of buckshot. When veteran German forces charged them, the Germans were not decimated, they were destroyed.

The Germans tried to get the shotguns banned as inhumane under the Hague Convention. They cavilled not at poison gas, mines, sawtooth bayonets, massed machine guns, flamethrowers, or grenades, but they drew the line at the destruction massed fire from the 97s wreaked. Think about that for a moment....

600 German infantrymen armed with 98 Mausers could fire five times each for a total of 3000 projectiles capable of causing death or a wound before the infantrymen had to reload.

600 US troops armed with the 97s could fire 00 buck loads 7 times each with each shell holding 9 projectiles capable of causing death or a wound before the Yanks had to reload. Do the math...

The effect was so impressive that it caused a certain Captain, later Colonel, Thompson to evaluate what would work best in close range warfare, leading to the development of the Thompson Submachine gun.

The German learned from it as well and developed various weaponry for short range work, leading to the concept of the assault rifle.

Back to the 97. It stayed in military, police and correctional inventories until very recently. The 97 was removed from production around 1957, victim of high production costs and competition from newer designs like the 870.

Enough of history, why would anyone be interested in an obsolete shotgun dead for a half century?

Because they are one of the best pump guns ever made, and also one of the best production shotguns ever made to boot.

Because the CAS folks treasure them almost as much as the military re-enactors and collectors do.

Because there's still lots of them out there, oft quite capable of being used here and now. And they're too much gun to just leave sitting there. 97s close with a solid Kachunk like the breech block of a 155 MM locking shut. The frame is about the same depth as that of the Superposed, and the shooter's hands fall close to a straight line,making this one of the better pointers among our shotguns. Most shotgunners do well with the 97.

Now the downside of discovering your Great Grandfather's 97 in the attic....

Many fall under The Curse of the Short Chamber Demon, being chambered for the shell variously called the 2 1/2", 2 5/8", and 2 9/16" load. About one of three are so burdened.

Others have been shot a lot(Remember those market gunners?) and parts are worn. SOME 97s can be jarred off the half cock notch easily, and ALL should be checked out by a qualified smith before use.

The Fan Fire thing is highly prized by some, but has contributed to many a miss and many a ND over the decades.

And, as the bolt comes back over the firing hand, many an incision has come from a high wrist. This prob IS self correcting, but I'm trying to save you from a scar.

Short chambers can be altered to 2 3/4" by a decent smith for a reasonable amount of money. I'd do this on a field grade 97 with honorable wear in a heartbeat. On a high grade 97 or one in pristine condition, I'd buy or make 2 1/2" loads. MEC makes a kit to convert their loaders for this, and Gamebore, Kent, etc, market lower pressure, short ammo for these and old doubles.

I wouldn't use short magnums, non toxics, or turkey loads in these, but most will handle heavy field loads with aplomb. Light target loads are just the ticket for fun.

Some are very tightly choked. With modern ammo, a barrel marked Modified may give Full choke patterns. Full choked barrels run like turkey chokes, a fact not lost on the card shooters.

Some models, like the US marked ones pack so much collector value that forgeries are common. Caveat Emptor.
 
Last edited:
Dave, what are the field reports on the new replicas?

Not that I intend to start a thread hijack about the moral pitfalls of buying Chicom weapons, but are the Norinco 97 replicas doing well as folks shoot them over time? (I *relly* want one of those 97 trenchguns...)
 
Great article Dave!

Here is a site that has some good info on the M1897 Winchester. Manufacturing dates, part schematics etc:

http://www.marauder13.homestead.com/Shotgun.html

My M1897, circa 1906, has been thrown into the regular rotation. It now has the coveted title of "Official Bumming Around Shotgun" The takedown feature makes it easy to stow in my tiny car and it carries one more round than my Western Field 550. As far as the rest of the family is concerned, the M97 is broken and is waiting parts(and will be waiting for parts for a long long time).

ZM
 
Thanks for the responses, folks.

98,can't answer that. No one I know well has one. Moral implications aside, the design requires tight tolerances and fine machining.

Zeke, thanks for the link. Your thread about that 97 was part of the inspiration for this. Enjoy your heirloom....
 
Darn it Dave :). I was looking at several of these yesterday at the harrisburg pa show, and I tried telling myself i didnt need one. Guess I better start saving up and counting up the coin jar. :) thanks for the great info piece.
 
SapperLeader, want and need are oft interchangeable. If it tickles your fancy, why not? And you're very welcome..

A coupla things....

A 97 formed part of our equipment during the Nam Mess. It was a comfort to have on guard duty on dark nights.

The two tightest slug groups I've ever seen fired from a smoothbore were from a 16 gauge model 97 used by its fourth generation owner. Cloverleafs at 100 yards.

A friend who has a pair of these, one a field grade and one the Black Diamond Trap model, says that no US made gun was ever held to such tight tolerances. While he owns and operates some nice shotguns, the 97s are the shotguns of his heart. He's deadly with them on birds.

Wenig carries new wood for these, and I'm sure Numrich has old stuff.
 
One good source for info on the Norincos is the SASS boards. Another is the military shotgun board at [__________] (forgetting name and URL). I spent some time earlier this year reading and searching in those two places and decided to pass on the repros, but YMMV. As Dave says, the design was well adapted to the manufacturing methods and technology of the period, not clear that it is so today...

I have handled the repros a fair bit. One thing that always catches me a little off guard with the 1897 is the potential for catching bits of flesh (mine) with the bolt when it comes backwards. I am sure this would not be an issue if I used one regularly.
 
Good to see you again, J. As for the clone guns...

The September 2003 issue of American Rifleman(Same one as the big article on 870s) has something in The Dope Bag, a product review of the Interstate Arms 97 clone. This is the Trench Model heatshield and all.

A couple things stand out in the review....

"File marks and rough final work were noted on our 97".

"The trigger dropped at a crisp 7 lbs".

"Initially,patterns were fired at 40 and 25 yards,but after experiencing only one or two fluky hits from the cylinder bored barrel our of several magazines full of shells, we moved the board in to 15 yards". IOW, they couldn't get it on paper at standard distances.

The pattern results from 10 rounds showed COP 4-5" high and the same right at 15 yards.

I'm not making this up, folks.

List is $425. For that,I'd rather have an original even if in less than new condition.
 
FWIW, my 97 is the only shotgun I own that the Aguila 1-inch slugs function reliably in--and the mag holds nine of the little buggers:D

OTOH, they start keyholing at ten yards and give eighteen-inch groups at twenty yards:(

Denny
 
Hiya Dave! Y'know, the funny thing about the AR Dope Bag note was that (to me at least, YMMV) the overall impression was very positive! It kind of got me interested in checking them out. Unfortunately you often have to read between the lines, even in the AR, and in this case (as your quotes show) you don't even have to do that!

I may buy one someday. I have had an interest in these for more than 30 years since a great-great uncle, Ed Pugsley, showed me a mint 1897 trench gun that he'd hung onto when he gave all (almost all) of his guns away.
 
Yeah, J, it looks like even AR has caved in to commercialism. Your Great Uncle had good taste.

Denny, isn't it ironic?
 
Not that anyone cares:)
Bad Bad case of "wants" for a '97, for yours truly...this topic, the pics ain't helping...not that anyone cares, I just had to vent...NO I don't feel better. :D

Denny send me yours...lemmee see if it keyholes in a different time zone...all for the sake of research and all...you can even post my testing in S.W.A T. :D

I can't get by with anything it seems...
 
SM-
There's still some out there to be had. Louis Awerbuck got another one last week, serial number 11XXXX placing it made in 1900.

I'll send you mine via airmail.
As soon as our flying pigs get back on schedule.

Denny
 
Model 1897 - simply the King of Pump Shotguns in my book. Here's mine!
attachment.php
 
Denny, I think "that" airmail service is working in my area...I'll PM my addy. :D

BigG, you ain't helping one darn bit. :) That is a fine pic of a classic.

Gentlemen I know they exist, just doncha hate it when you have to take care of prioties and be responsible first? Sigh...

You guys ever notice when you use paper shells in these things, it really "feels" different? I know paper shells do that anyway, but in an older gun like a '97, model 12 it's like going back in time or something.
 
Thanks, Dave......

That's a great post on the Model '97.

One additional M97 design feature exists for causing injury to the shooter.

My father had a 2" scar on the fleshy part of the heel of his left hand from a rabbit hunt with his M97 in bitter cold during the winter of 1927.

The front edges of the carrier are sharp, and if a wet or cold-numbed hand slips off the forend damage will result.:eek:

To its credit, though, I do not remember a single malfunction from that M97, and we shot it a lot through the years. :)
 
I have to say I learned a lot from your post Dave. Growing up in the '50s and '60s I thought the 97 was the worst gun made. Not worst shotgun, but worst gun. My great uncle's daily use gun, and only gun, was a 97 and it wasn't safe on half-cock or full-cock. He was used to it, but you couldn't shoulder it too hard or you'd get a surprise. (No gun snobs in my family, my grandfather used a double hammer gun with Damascus barrels up into the '60s !!! My uncle has it, but won't shoot it anymore.)

My father still tells the story from time to time about the day the 97 'went off' behind the seat in his uncle's truck and blew a nice hole in the rust.

John
 
Thanks for the info, John. Maybe folks will take heed and hie their Great Uncle Zeb's duck gun to the smith before trying to shoot it in the field.
 
my experience...

I had good luck with a '97 for some years on quail, grouse and bunnys. Not a bad skeet gun, either. However, I got rid of it after I had a second accident with it, neither of which resulted in injury, thank God. The hammer safety and decocking system and numb-cold fingers in teh cold Northern Wisconsin weather are not a good combination. The design leavesmuch to be desired in this deaprtment, although the gun was great in other respects.
 
Thank you sir for the great Thread.

I gotta git me one of those Norinco repros...if I would only stop spending money on Garands...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top