But I only have a few grey hairs.
If they're informed, yes. The problem is most Americans aren't. Thankfully the internet has helped educate a lot of people the past 10-20 years.TTV2. I agree with you. Do you think congress and the vast American people would to?
Yeah, that's why I ordered my new 6.5G upper, 12 hi-cap mags and 4K rds of ammo SundayWe are not getting suppressors out of this. Devils advocate here. “What if the Vegas shooter had a suppressor and you couldn’t hear where they shots were coming from?”
I hope we get reciprocity, armed guards in schools or cpl in present gun free zones. I hope NOT that we get an assault weapons ban and trumps out one term. Who would replace him? A Democrat? I do believe he’s doing the Nra thing and I’m cautiously optimistic watching as of now.
The thing there is that being a certain age violates equal protection clauses, so I don't think they'd hold up in court. Even if they are held up, as long as it's semi-auto rifles that are centerfire, I wouldn't be opposed.Yup- Life's good unless you happen to be a law abiding gun owner in the 18 - 21 age bracket who wants to purchase a semi-auto rifle. In my first eight months of being 18, I purchased three rifles, including a SKS and a MAK-90. I was even able to buy some 20 and 30 rd magazines (SCARRY) in the post-'94 AW ban world.
Gotta love a bunch of THR gray hairs deciding who's rights should be violated.
When it comes to short rifles/shotguns, I think the average person is more concerned it's a gun, not so much the size of it. They won't care.
I though he had our backs?
Hopefully he won't take the black powders. That'd one reason why I like them, they'd be the last to go.
I’m sitting here at the ripe old age of 35. And honestly, I’m a little stunned by some of these comments as well. It appears that some THR members are fine with the actions of a few affecting millions. But it’s fine because it doesn’t affect them because they’re older. That’s NOT pro-2A. That’s pro-“ME”.I have a few too, but I guess not enough to cloud my judgement and accept blanket firearms restrictions that effect millions of Americans on a whim.
I’m sitting here at the ripe old age of 35. And honestly, I’m a little stunned by some of these comments as well. It appears that some THR members are fine with the actions of a few affecting millions. But it’s fine because it doesn’t affect them because they’re older. That’s NOT pro-2A. That’s pro-“ME”.
I’m sitting here at the ripe old age of 35. And honestly, I’m a little stunned by some of these comments as well. It appears that some THR members are fine with the actions of a few affecting millions. But it’s fine because it doesn’t affect them because they’re older. That’s NOT pro-2A. That’s pro-“ME”.
Shouldering braces is the exact reason the SBR/SBS laws are stupid anyway. AR pistols have been out there for many years and now have braces that people can buy, yet I think all of one AR pistol has been used in a shooting since 2004.Since you can now shoulder the pistol braces, not sure it makes much of a difference. Sure would like to get a .300B Rattler with a suppressor without paying any tax stamps (also called giving up my rights).
The way I see it is it’s never been more critical to get our pro gun based ideas out there on how to stop mass shootings. If not we will lose. This may seem hard to believe to us but there are a lot of people out there who generally don’t care about guns and dont see a problem with banning the “bad apples” of them since they’re offensive anyways and if it doesn’t work then we’ll figure out what else to do. That’s the slippery slope. The pro gun community needs to step out of the defense. The antis resist our ideas like cpl in gun free zones and especially armed guards in schools because if those ideas work (and our ideas should because they are logical ) then in halts there public disarmament goals. Let’s face it. They claim guns in schools could be accidents waiting to happen but are okay with proven failed laws while waiting for another mass shooting to occur.
I don't think the three people who have used AR-15's the past few months for mass murder should result in everyone who is innocent being penalized. That's not who we are, that's not what we do, that's not what America stands for.I’m sitting here at the ripe old age of 35. And honestly, I’m a little stunned by some of these comments as well. It appears that some THR members are fine with the actions of a few affecting millions. But it’s fine because it doesn’t affect them because they’re older. That’s NOT pro-2A. That’s pro-“ME”.
Some of us tried to tell people otherwise, but we were repeatedly scolded and told his conversion was real and his past anti gun leanings were of no concern.... time will tell.I though he had our backs?
Hopefully he won't take the black powders. That'd one reason why I like them, they'd be the last to go.
He's going with the NRA, no worries. Everything he's mentioned the NRA has also mentioned (with some added vaguery on bump stocks).
Uhh...yeah. Thanks. I read that the day after it was originally posted. What’s your point? That the NRA was willing to sell our bumpstocks just like you are willing to do for 18-21 year olds?Well, you might check out the comments on bump stocks from the NRA:
https://home.nra.org/joint-statement
I’m sitting here at the ripe old age of 35. And honestly, I’m a little stunned by some of these comments as well. It appears that some THR members are fine with the actions of a few affecting millions. But it’s fine because it doesn’t affect them because they’re older. That’s NOT pro-2A. That’s pro-“ME”.
The difference is that getting something out of bumpstock bans or 18-20 age restrictions on riflesUhh...yeah. Thanks. I read that the day after it was originally posted. What’s your point? That the NRA was willing to sell our bumpstocks just like you are willing to do for 18-21 year olds?
Capacity limits are not being scrutinized by Trump, Sessions, or the ATF and they never should be because hi capacity magazines are the best tools for self defense that a legal and innocent gun owner can use to defend themselves. If a hi capacity mag law ever gets floated, I'm never voting again.So let’s classify a piece of plastic and a spring as a machine gun. Then after that, because bumpstocks can be duplicated by a couple rubber bands, it must be the gun that’s the problem, because it’s capable of faster fire. So let’s limit its capacity. Well that didn’t work. Now we have to restrict the gun itself. And viola... congrats. You just gave it away and spit on 18-21 year olds.
Uhh...yeah. Thanks. I read that the day after it was originally posted. What’s your point? That the NRA was willing to sell our bumpstocks just like you are willing to do for 18-21 year olds?
So let’s classify a piece of plastic and a spring as a machine gun. Then after that, because bumpstocks can be duplicated by a couple rubber bands, it must be the gun that’s the problem, because it’s capable of faster fire. So let’s limit its capacity. Well that didn’t work. Now we have to restrict the gun itself. And viola... congrats. You just gave it away and spit on 18-21 year olds.