Outlaws
Member
Ruger did make some special 10/22's for sale at Walmart.
He was abe to tell the difference the same way the fortune teller was able to tell that I was divorcedHe told me what the difference is, but I don't remember right now. Trigger guard maybe. I can tell you for certain that he knows if an 870 is Wal-Mart or not. He claims that Wal-Mart guns are not as well finished and might cause problems. Whatever the reason, he didn't want it.
Your example of Snapper sort of disproves the rest of your statement. You mean the suppliers feel they must go off shore. As to quality, I have seen a lot of junk from every country.
For a gun example. Norinco 1911 or Highpoint 45. Frankly the Chinese pistol is hands down better quality than the American Highpoint.
And once more, let's beat up Wally World for getting suppliers to lower their prices, AND pass that on to the consumer.
I guess you prefer suppliers making more money, and the consumer paying more.
Must be an economics major.
And how do they do that. Force everyone to buy by holding their first born hostage. Nope! Good products at fair prices.
Actually, the public always prefers better values. That is why most folks don't buy the cheapest car, house etc. Otherwise at the various counters EVEN in Wally World they would offer only the Cheapest. Nope that myth don't fly here.
Wally World didn't disassemble the manufacturing capability of the United States. You and I did. We the consumer.
Want to pay more and get less. Go for it. I choose to be rational. Every product has it's price point. That comes from you and I, not the manufacturer, or the retailer.
Just admit you don't like Wal-Mart. It's okay you don't have to like anything or body for any reason, just don't try to rationalize the irrational, to me.
Go figure.
Fred
Use your brain in thinking this over. The Snapper story doesn't disprove anything. If a retailer comes to you and says "We'll buy your product only if it's 40% cheaper" your options for acheiving that are limited. If it's like Snapper's case and the retailer opens with this you can just walk away. However, if you're already devoted to making stuff for the retailer and your company depends on the contract, if they come around and say "we need 40% cheaper or you're cancelled" you're screwed.
Again, brain. There are only so many ways to get really low prices. At a certain point they become detrimental. Not low prices themselves, but how they're possible. If a supplier making more money, without waste or bloated CEOs, means three thousand people in your state being employed vs. being on Welfare, I might pay a little more for a product. But wait, if they did go out of business they could always go to work for the Wal-Mart or Home Depot that just opened up down the road.
Wal-Mart doesn't force consumers to do anything, I never said that. A large percentage of the population, being the bleating brainless sheep they are, will follow the lowest prices regardless. And define "fair prices." Fair to whom? I could probably undercut Wal-Mart's prices by having stuff made by comapanies owned by the Iranian government and US consumers would beat a path to my door.
The public prefers _percieved_ better values, not actual. They don't buy the cheapest car or house because they'd appear cheap to the neighbors. Look at appliances these days, or electronics, or furniture, etc. People have been trained to think it's normal for something to last a couple years, and then have to buy a new one. When my father bought a refrigerator it came with a 20-year warranty and lasted 35 years. A lot of the new ones have a 5-year warranty and won't make it much past that.
A year or two ago in Sears they had a sale on $35 no-name DVD players. Customers were buying them by the armload instead of the brand-name ones that cost twice as much. The electronics salesman told me to my face that they were seeing most of them come back just out of warranty. I still bought one, just on a whim, and damned if it didn't die after five months. A friend of mine bought one at the same time that lasted four months. Yet still, the $35 DVD players are the ones that sell out in stores.
Which is what I've been saying all along, and it's taken this long for you to admit it. You and millions others choose to buy products that save you money in the short term at any cost. When offered a choice, you choose to support the Chinese.[
It's a difference of opinion and I don't mind that. But to say I'm not rational is, well, irrational. A price point at the most basic level does come from the manufacturer. If something takes $5 worth of iron, $3 in oil, $3 in copper, and a man-hour to make you simply can't honestly charge less. But if your factory is in a country with intentionally undervalued currency, subsidised by the military, and your employees live on the second floor of the warehouse, you can.
I'm have more dislike for the average consumer's lack of informed buying than I do Wal-Mart's business model. They're simply realizing consumers will whore themselves out to get a cheap television and are taking advantage of the situation.
What happened to Walmart had nothing to do with Sam WaltonThat's exactly what Sam Walton did, like it or not.
Don't know about that, but I do know we did when the mega Malls started popping up around hereI wonder if people whined this much about Sears, Penny's, Woolworth's, Murphy's, and so on a hundred years ago?
Where is the sense in thinking that you might give your biggest seller of your products lemons?
Very true.Several "special" guns have indeed been made for walmart
I don't buy that, where's the proof? Can you supply irrefutable data to support that statement?They are however cheaper and an inferior quality arm,
You can call them up and talk to reps at the company. Now you have to be clever in your questioning as they are not going to put down any of thier products.I don't buy that, where's the proof? Can you supply irrefutable data to support that statement?
In all fairness he asked you to prove your argument not for a way for him to prove it for youYou can call them up and talk to reps at the company. Now you have to be clever in your questioning as they are not going to put down any of their products.
made to compete with the cheaper to make Winchester and Mossberg guns.
AgainThey are STILL inferior products.
and chooses Wal Mart as their primary initial outlet does not mean that Wal Mart has commissioned the productmade to compete with the cheaper to make Winchester and Mossberg guns.
With Walmart's pressure on suppliers to lower costs, something has to give and it's not just profit margin. I didn't fall off a turnip truck so don't try to tell me quality doesn't suffer. It may be no more than skipping some QA testing...so good luck if the product that's shipped happens to be first quality. I hate what Walmart has done to America!!! There are some things you just don't want to go to the lowest bidder. Unfortunately, those things are harder and harder to find.