Funderb
Member
remember, it is one thing to lift all regulation, but another to see people flocking toward guns as if the deregulation changed their, largely, ignorant opinions.
Would you really want to have your 'hood turn into places like that?
"if you want to know the answer to this, just look at parts of the world where this is already happening: Somalia, Pakistan FATA, most of Afghanistan, etc. Would you really want to have your 'hood turn into places like that? Somalia would be a prime example. Anyone can carry anything they want there....when you put things into perspective, I hardly think a "polite" society will be created from the OP's scenario."
With an age restriction as the ONLY barrier, you're opening the door to felons, repeat offenders, rapists, terrorists, loose cannons, mentally warped, clinically insane.
if you want to know the answer to this, just look at parts of the world where this is already happening: Somalia, Pakistan FATA, most of Afghanistan, etc.
Less problems in the U.S before GCA68 than after, by a huge margin!
I was there at the time it passed and well before.
Our current mess isn't about gun control ... it's about total Control!
Guns are merely the excuse!
What would happen? Most places would be like living in the fifties.
As most of the more onerous gun laws have been enacted since then.
sernv99 said:Reagan expanded gov't spending to a great degree during his presidency. That would equate bigger govt.
ummm, you left that out....and you can google for dozens and dozens of references, from both liberal and conservative sourcesresident Ronald Regan said; "Government isn't the solution to the problem, government IS the problem!"(possibly an all purpose universal Truth?)
ok boys and girls, seems some have not had a history class on 20th century American presidents.
as I said before, you can google liberal and conserative think tanks and politicos
as I said before, you can google liberal and conserative think tanks and politicos, they will tell you Reagan was a hypocrite and he expanded gov't but not at the behest of Congress. The only good thing he did was facilitate the demise of the Soviet Union. As far as domestic issues, he is as worthless as Carter before him and Bush Sr. after him.
anything your back and wallet could support