You Ron Paul supporters are part of the reason that the Democrats, anti-gun all, have a good chance of winning. The Libertarians received under 2% of the presidential vote 20 years ago, and more recently have lost ground! Do you really think you are helping the cause of supporting the 2nd Amendment by voting for a fringe candidate with NO, repeat NO chance of winning. As bad as some of the Republican leaders are on gun rights the Democrats are far worse. Settling for the lesser of evils, when that lesser has a chance of winning, in much more likely to maintain our gun rights that stupidly wasting a vote on a total loser. While the current Republican front runners, Guliani, McCain and Romney are all less than ideal from a gun rights point of view, they will want the support of gun owners and will move toward our position enough to try to keep us from not voting or from voting for a Ron Paul like character that only strenghens the Democrats chances of winning. Don't forget that when Clinton won in 1992 he had far less than 50% of the vote. He only won because a sizable number of conservatives voted for Ross Perot and thus denied the presidency to the Republican incumbent, the first George Bush. Wake up and grow up; this is a two party country and the only way to make your vote count is within the two party system.