A full auto is no different than a semi
in terms of complexity to use.
With a small amount of experience, one can be just as proficient with either.
So once again I see no difference as they both are essentially the same kind of tool. (in the sense that a standard and automatic are still both a car.)
It could (and is, irrationally) be argued that no one but cops and soldiers should have
any guns, because they require professional training to use.
Maybe there is a difference in the skill involved. But
every full auto I've shot required attention payed to the exact same four rules, and the exact same mentality and the exact same sight picture as shooting a semi-auto.
But maybe I'm missing something, what is it that makes them only suitable for the hands of payed professionals?
Or is it that you just don't trust the average Joe with such an effective tool?
I do understand that a full auto can physically throw more lead in the air, resulting in more collateral damage. But I still can't see any justification as to why people in position of power require these devices, and we don't.
BUT
You can't put Roland and Cort on the same level at Jake's father or Aaron Deepneau, can you?
No matter how much I disagree with you, that line is made of pure, unrefined awesome.