Tallinar
Member
I am tactical. My guns are not.
CPE won the thread with this post.
I am tactical. My guns are not.
I can nail a target just fine with an M4 and iron sights out to 600m --or with an ACOG, PEQ2A, Surefire light, and Harris bipod on an army issue KAC rail system and burst trigger, which is my preferred setup but with a 2 stage trigger instead.
CPE won the thread with this post
I never feel a need to trash someone else's choices in women, motorcycles, birddogs or firearms.
... what is the term for firearms specifically made/designed/upgraded for combat use?
We can make a gun designed for the military into a gun to be used for hunting or targets by civilians by sporterizing it.
So what about the other way around? Surely, suppressors, collapsible stocks, red-dot sights, etc, have specific purposes. Namely, for use in combat with other people. So what are we doing to a weapon when we put these things on one?
Actually in all seriousness, I think I'm gonna swim upstream on this topic.
If tactical is a mindset, and has nothing to do with tools, what is the term for firearms specifically made/designed/upgraded for combat use?
We can make a gun designed for the military into a gun to be used for hunting or targets by civilians by sporterizing it.
So what about the other way around? Surely, suppressors, collapsible stocks, red-dot sights, etc, have specific purposes. Namely, for use in combat with other people. So what are we doing to a weapon when we put these things on one?
Tactics are "procedures for gaining advantage." Therefore, it's possible to do something tactically. And if you can do something in a "tactical" way, then you can do something tactical to an object. In other words, modifying an object via procedures for gaining advantage. Or, if you prefer, "tacticalized." Of course... nobody prefers that.
It is very disappointing that the gun doesn't make the man. I was hoping the Colt revolver would make me Marshall Kane.